Advertisement

Gamification in Open and Distance Learning: A Systematic Review

  • Murat SümerEmail author
  • Cengiz Hakan Aydın
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Gamification defined as the use of game design elements in nongame contexts or is the integration of game elements, mechanics, and frameworks into nongame situations and scenarios (Horizon Report, 2013). It, so far, has most frequently been used as a clever way to promote a business or product. Besides using gamification in business, there are also examples in education, for example, where in most real cases it is implemented only in the physical classroom. This is the easy way for teachers to integrate game elements for a small group of learners. However, to digitizing the gamification strategy or placing the related mechanisms online is very different, and such issues tend to be not discussed in many of the basic guidelines (Kuo and Chuang, Comput Hum Behav 55:16–27, 2016).

This chapter intends to reveal the answer of the questions of (1) which game elements and combinations have been mostly used in the field of open and distance learning, (2) what the distributions of the studies according to the publication type and year are, (3) what the level of studies according to the target audiences (elementary, secondary, higher, and lifelong) are, and (4) what the common findings say. The answers will provide an overview of the research on gamification in Open and Distance Learning. Moreover, the study will be a guideline for the institutes and provide practical information to integrate game elements to online programs successfully.

Keywords

Gamification Open and distance learning e-Learning Systematic literature review Mapping study 

References

  1. *These researches have been used in the systematic literature review.Google Scholar
  2. Aguilar, S., Holman, C., Fishman, B. (2014). GradeCraft: A working example. Paper presented at Games+Learning+Society 10.0. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.Google Scholar
  3. *Albarqouni, S., Baur, C., Achilles, F., Belagiannis, V., Demirci, S., & Navab, N. (2016). Aggnet: deep learning from crowds for mitosis detection in breast cancer histology images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 35(5), 1313–1321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. *Auvinen, T., Hakulinen, L., & Malmi, L. (2015). Increasing students’ awareness of their behavior in online learning environments with visualizations and achievement badges. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 8(3), 261–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. *Bahji, S. E., El Alami, J., & Lefdaoui, Y. (2015) Learners’ attitudes towards extended-blended learning experience based on the S2P learning model. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Applications, 1(6), 70–78.Google Scholar
  6. *Betts, B. W., Bal, J., & Betts, A. W. (2013). Gamification as a tool for increasing the depth of student understanding using a collaborative e-learning environment. International Journal of Continuing Engineering Education and Life Long Learning, 23(3–4), 213–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. *Bidarra, J., Figueiredo, M., & Natálio, C. (2015). Interactive design and gamification of eBooks for mobile and contextual learning. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies (iJIM), 9, 24–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. *Brusilovsky, P., Somyürek, S., Guerra, J., Hosseini, R., Zadorozhny, V., & Durlach, P. J. (2016). Open social student modeling for personalized learning. IEEE Transactions on Emerging Topics in Computing, 4(3), 450–461.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. *Callaghan, N. (2016). Investigating the role of Minecraft in educational learning environments. Educational Media International, 53(4), 244–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. *Chang, J. W., & Wei, H. Y. (2016). Exploring engaging gamification mechanics in massive online open courses. Educational Technology & Society, 19(2), 177–203.Google Scholar
  11. *Chen, C. H., Liu, G. Z., & Hwang, G. J. (2015). Interaction between gaming and multistage guiding strategies on students' field trip mobile learning performance and motivation. British Journal of Educational Technology, 47(6), 1032–1050.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. *Christy, K. R., & Fox, J. (2014). Leaderboards in a virtual classroom: A test of stereotype threat and social comparison explanations for women’s math performance. Computers & Education, 78, 66–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chuang, I., & Ho, A. D. (2016). HarvardX and MITx: Four years of open online courses – Fall 2012–Summer 2016. Available at https://ssrn.com/abstract=2889436 or  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2889436.
  14. *Coccoli, M., Iacono, S., & Vercelli, G. (2015). Applying gamification techniques to enhance effectiveness of video-lessons. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3), 73–84.Google Scholar
  15. Davis, D., Jivet, I., Kizilcec, R. F., Chen, G., Hauff, C., Houben, G. J. (2017). Follow the successful crowd: Raising MOOC completion rates through social comparison at scale. In LAK (pp. 454–463). ACM, New York, NY, US.Google Scholar
  16. *Del Fatto, V., Dodero, G., Gennari, R., & Mastachi, N. (2014). Extreme apprenticeship meets playful design at operating systems labs: A case study. In Methodologies and intelligent systems for technology enhanced learning (pp. 19–26). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  17. *De-Marcos, L., Domínguez, A., Saenz-de-Navarrete, J., & Pagés, C. (2014). An empirical study comparing gamification and social networking on e-learning. Computers & Education, 75, 82–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. *De-Marcos, L., García-López, E., García-Cabot, A., Medina-Merodio, J. A., Domínguez, A., Martínez-Herráiz, J. J., & Diez-Folledo, T. (2016). Social network analysis of a gamified e-learning course: Small-world phenomenon and network metrics as predictors of academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 60, 312–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Deterding, S., Sicart, M., Nacke, L., O’Hara, K., & Dixon, D. (2011). Gamification. using game-design elements in non-gaming contexts. In CHI’11 extended abstracts on human factors in computing systems (pp. 2425–2428). ACM.Google Scholar
  20. Dhorne, L., Deflandre, J. P., Bernaert, O., Bianchi, S., & Thirouard, M. (2017). Mentoring learners in MOOCs: A new way to improve completion rates? In European conference on massive open online courses (pp. 29–37). Cham, Switzerland: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2015). Gamification in education: a systematic mapping study. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 18(3), 75.Google Scholar
  22. *DomíNguez, A., Saenz-De-Navarrete, J., De-Marcos, L., FernáNdez-Sanz, L., PagéS, C., & MartíNez-HerráIz, J. J. (2013). Gamifying learning experiences: Practical implications and outcomes. Computers & Education, 63, 380–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. *Fernández, C., Esteban, G., Conde, M. A., & Garcia-Penalvo, F. J. (2016). Improving motivation in a haptic teaching/learning framework. Framework, 32(1B), 553–562.Google Scholar
  24. Gartner. (2012). https://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2251015. Retrieved date: 15 Oct 2017.
  25. *Gudoniene, D., Bartkute, R., Rutkauskiene, D., & Blazauskas, T. (2016). Technological aspects of the gamification model for e-learning participant’s engagement. Baltic Journal of Modern Computing, 4(4), 1008.Google Scholar
  26. Guo, P. (2017). MOOC and SPOC, which one is better? Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 13(8), 5961–5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. *Hakulinen, L., Auvinen, T., & Korhonen, A. (2015). The effect of achievement badges on students’ behavior: An empirical study in a university-level computer science course. iJET, 10(1), 18–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2014). Does gamification work?–a literature review of empirical studies on gamification. In System Sciences (HICSS), 2014 47th Hawaii International Conference on (pp. 3025–3034). IEEE.Google Scholar
  29. *Hamzah, W. M., Ali, N. H., Saman, M., Mohd, Y., Yusoff, M. H., & Yacob, A. (2015). Influence of gamification on students’ motivation in using e-learning applications based on the motivational design model. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(2), 30–34.Google Scholar
  30. *Hurst, E. J. (2015). Beyond learning incentives. Journal of Electronic Resources in Medical Libraries, 12(3), 182–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. *Ibáñez, M. B., Di-Serio, A., & Delgado-Kloos, C. (2014). Gamification for engaging computer science students in learning activities: A case study. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 7(3), 291–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Iosup, A., & Epema, D. (2014). An experience report on using gamification in technical higher education. In Proceedings of the 45th ACM technical symposium on Computer science education (pp. 27–32). ACM.Google Scholar
  33. Johnson, L., Adams Becker, S., Cummins, M., Estrada, V., Freeman, A., & Ludgate, H. (2013). NMC horizon report: 2013 higher education edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.Google Scholar
  34. Jordan, K. (2017). MOOC completion rates: The data. Retrieved 21 Mar 2017, available at: http://www.katyjordan.com/MOOCproject.html
  35. Khalil, H., & Ebner, M. (2014). MOOCs completion rates and possible methods to improve retention – A literature review. In Proceedings of world conference on educational multimedia, hypermedia and telecommunications 2014 (pp. 1236–1244). Chesapeake, VA: AACE.Google Scholar
  36. *Knutas, A., Ikonen, J., Maggiorini, D., Ripamonti, L., & Porras, J. (2016). Creating student interaction profiles for adaptive collaboration gamification design. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), 7(3), 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. *Kocadere, S. A., & Çağlar, Ş. (2015). The design and implementation of a gamified assessment. Journal of e-Learning and Knowledge Society, 11(3), 85–99.Google Scholar
  38. Kuo, M. S., & Chuang, T. Y. (2016). How gamification motivates visits and engagement for online academic dissemination – An empirical study. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 16–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. *Labus, A., Despotović-Zrakić, M., Radenković, B., Bogdanović, Z., & Radenković, M. (2015). Enhancing formal e-learning with edutainment on social networks. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(6), 592–605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59(5), 593–618.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lee, J. J., & Hammer, J. (2011). Gamification in education: What, how, why bother? Academic Exchange Quarterly, 15(2), 146.Google Scholar
  42. *Lee, S., & Lim, S. (2015). Gamification on phrase building training application. International Journal of Software Engineering and Its Applications, 9(3), 183–194.Google Scholar
  43. *Lewis, T. G., & Bergin, R. (2016). Imitation and novelty in product development. Cognitive Systems Research, 38, 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. *Malas, R. I., & Hamtini, T. (2016). A gamified e-learning design model to promote and improve learning. International Review on Computers and Software (IRECOS), 11(1), 8–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. *Markopoulos, A. P., Fragkou, A., Kasidiaris, P. D., & Davim, J. P. (2015). Gamification in engineering education and professional training. International Journal of Mechanical Engineering Education, 43(2), 118–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Meyer, R. (2012). What it’s like to teach a MOOC (and what the heck’s a MOOC?). Retrieved 20 Mar 2017, available at: http://tinyurl.com/cdfvvqy
  47. Muñoz-Merino, P. J., Rodríguez, E. M., Kloos, C. D., & Ruipérez-Valiente, J. A. (2017). Design, implementation and evaluation of SPOCs at the Universidad Carlos III de Madrid. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 23(2), 167–186.Google Scholar
  48. *Olsson, M., Mozelius, P., & Collin, J. (2015). Visualisation and gamification of e-learning and programming education. Electronic Journal of e-Learning, 13(6), 441–454.Google Scholar
  49. *Orooji, F., Taghiyareh, F., & Nasirifard, P. (2015). DoosMooc: An online learning environment equipped with innovative social interactions. Bulletin of the IEEE Technical Committee on Learning Technology, 17(3), 18.Google Scholar
  50. *Osipov, I. V., Volinsky, A. A., & Grishin, V. V. (2014). Gamification, virality and retention in educational online platform. Measurable indicators and market entry strategy. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.5401.Google Scholar
  51. *Osipov, I. V., Nikulchev, E., Volinsky, A. A., & Prasikova, A. Y. (2015). Study of gamification effectiveness in online e-learning systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 6(2), 71–77.Google Scholar
  52. *Osipov, I. V., Volinsky, A. A., Nikulchev, E., & Prasikova, A. Y. (2016). Communication and gamification in the web-based foreign language educational system: Web-based foreign language educational system. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies (IJWLTT), 11(4), 22–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. *Paiva, J. C., Leal, J. P., & Queirós, R. (2016a). Gamification of learning activities with the Odin service. Computer Science and Information Systems, 13, 809–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. *Paiva, R., Bittencourt, I. I., Tenório, T., Jaques, P., & Isotani, S. (2016b). What do students do on-line? Modeling students’ interactions to improve their learning experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. *Pakshina, N. A., Emelianova, J. P., Pravdina, M. V., & Ogorodnikov, K. O. (2016). Possible approaches to introducing students to the history of automatic control: Adding competitive elements. IFAC-PapersOnLine, 49(6), 180–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., Mattsson, M. (2008) Systematic mapping studies in software engineering. In Proceedings of the 12th international conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering, pp. 68–77. BCS Learning & Development Ltd. Swindon, UK.Google Scholar
  57. *Pilcher, J. (2014). Education and learning: What’s on the horizon? Neonatal Network, 33(1), 24–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive: The surprising truth about what motivates us. New York, NY: Penguin Group, Inc., 138, 240.Google Scholar
  59. Severance, C. (2013). MOOCs: An insider’s view. Computer, 46(10), 93–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. *Simões, J., Redondo, R. D., & Vilas, A. F. (2013). A social gamification framework for a K-6 learning platform. Computers in Human Behavior, 29(2), 345–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Sistemi, A. (2017). 2016–2017 Öğretim yılı açıköğretim sistemine ilişkin öğrenci görüşleri. Eskişehir: Anadolu Üniversitesi.Google Scholar
  62. *Strmeki, D., Bernik, A., Radoevi, D. (2015). Gamification in e-Learning: Introducing gamified design elements into e-learning systems. Journal of Computer Science, 11(12), 1108–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. *Tenório, T., Bittencourt, I. I., Isotani, S., Pedro, A., & Ospina, P. (2016). A gamified peer assessment model for on-line learning environments in a competitive context. Computers in Human Behavior, 64, 247–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Werbach, K., & Hunter, D. (2012). For the win: How game thinking can revolutionize your business. Wharton Digital Press.Google Scholar
  65. Zichermann, G., & Cunningham, C. (2011). Gamification by design: Implementing game mechanics in web and mobile apps. O’Reilly Media, Inc.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Education and Instructional TechnologyUşak UniversityMerkez, UşakTurkey
  2. 2.Department of Distance EducationAnadolu UniversityTepebaşı, EskişehirTurkey

Personalised recommendations