Skip to main content

Information About Likely Combat Success

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 29 Accesses

Synonyms

Combat; Deception; Overconfidence; Performance enhancement; Sex differences; War

Definition

The same psychological strategies that often lead to unnecessary war may often prevent war as well when overconfidence and bluffing encourage others to back down rather than fight.

Introduction

If both sides in combat made accurate assessments of their likelihood of success, war should not have to occur at all from a classical economic notion of rationality. If one side believes it is going to lose, it should not fight unless attacked but rather should make accommodations to the dominant side that preserve more life and treasure than would likely be lost in war. However, given the endemic nature of war, such accurate calibration clearly does not take place much of the time. But if that is the case, then the puzzle for evolutionary models is why so many people make so many mistakes so much of the time in making decisions about their likelihood of victory in combat. In other words, as...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(02), 203–214.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • De Mesquita, B., Smith, A., Siverson, R., & Morrow, J. (2005). The logic of political survival. Cambridge, MA: MIT press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fearon, J. D. (1995). Rationalist explanations for war. International Organization, 49(03), 379–414.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. D. (2009). Overconfidence and war. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. D., & Fowler, J. H. (2011). The evolution of overconfidence. Nature, 477(7364), 317–320.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. D., Wrangham, R. W., & Rosen, S. P. (2002). Is military incompetence adaptive?: An empirical test with risk-taking behaviour in modern warfare. Evolution and Human Behavior, 23(4), 245–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. D., McDermott, R., Barrett, E. S., Cowden, J., Wrangham, R., McIntyre, M. H., & Rosen, S. P. (2006). Overconfidence in wargames: Experimental evidence on expectations, aggression, gender and testosterone. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 273(1600), 2513–2520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrangham, R. (1999). Is military incompetence adaptive? Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(1), 3–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rose McDermott .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

McDermott, R. (2017). Information About Likely Combat Success. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_944-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_944-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics