Definition
Males do not maximally inseminate females each mating, but rather strategically inseminate sperm according to intrinsic factors such a body condition and extrinsic factors such as sperm competition risk and female quality.
Introduction
The root of the evolutionary differences between the sexes is gametic anisogamy, whereby males produce lots of tiny and relatively cheap gametes, while females produce fewer immotile and relatively more expensive gametes. Despite the relative difference in gametic investment between the sexes, males are clearly not always eager to mate, just as females are not always reluctant to mate to protect their high investment. And even when males do mate, they do not always inseminate females with the largest possible ejaculate or best quality sperm that they can make. Instead, ejaculates are often modified according to intrinsic and extrinsic factors (Wedell et...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
References
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1989). Number of sperm in human ejaculates varies in accordance with sperm competition theory. Animal Behaviour, 37, 867–869.
Baker, R. R., & Bellis, M. A. (1993). Human sperm competition: Ejaculate adjustment by males and the function of masturbation. Animal Behaviour, 46, 861–885.
Freund, M. (1963). Effect of frequency of emission on semen output and an estimate of daily sperm production in man. Journal of Reproduction and Fertility, 6, 269–286.
Joseph, P. N., Sharma, R. K., Agarwal, A., & Sirot, L. K. (2015). Men ejaculate larger volumes of semen, more motile sperm, and more quickly when exposed to images of novel women. Evolutionary Psychological Science, 1, 195–200.
Kelly, C. D., & Jennions, M. D. (2011). Sexual selection and sperm quantity: Meta-analyses of strategic ejaculation. Biological Reviews, 86, 863–884.
Kilgallon, S. J., & Simmons, L. W. (2005). Image content influences men’s semen quality. Biology Letters, 1, 253–255.
Leivers, S., Rhodes, G., & Simmons, L. W. (2014). Context-dependent relationship between a composite measure of men’s mate value and ejaculate quality. Behavioral Ecology, 25, 1115–1122.
McKibbin, W. F., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2013). Human sperm competition in postindustrial ecologies: Sperm competition cues predict adult DVD sales. Behavioural Ecology, 24, 819–823.
Shackelford, T. K., Pound, N., & Goetz, A. T. (2005). Psychological and Physiological Adaptations to Sperm Competition in Humans. Review of General Psychology, 9, 228.
Wedell, N., Gage, M. J., & Parker, G. A. (2002). Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 17, 313–320.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Brennan, P.L.R. (2016). Male Prudence and Sperm Limits. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_67-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_67-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences