Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Precopulatory Intrasexual Competition

  • Bruno Alves Buzatto
  • Renée Claire Firman
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_64-1

Synonyms

Definition

Precopulatory intrasexual competition occurs when individuals of the same sex compete directly for the opportunity to copulate with individuals of the opposite sex.

Introduction

Precopulatory intrasexual competition usually involves competition between males for the opportunity to copulate with receptive females. This phenomenon is thought to be responsible for the evolution of a variety of morphological traits, such as enlarged and elaborate male weaponry, and also behavioral traits, such as precopulatory mate guarding. When precopulatory intrasexual competition is particularly intense, it might also lead to the evolution of alternative reproductive tactics among males, often resulting in male dimorphism (bimodality in the size of traits, such as horns, which creates two distinct male morphs). Precopulatory competition can also generate sexual conflict, where the evolutionary interests of the two sexes are not...

Keywords

Sexual Selection Sperm Competition Dung Beetle Sexual Conflict Intrasexual Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Alcock, J. (1996). Male size and survival: The effects of male combat and bird predation in Dawson’s burrowing bees, Amegilla dawsoni. Ecological Entomology, 21, 309–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez, F. (1993). Risks of fighting in relation to age and territory holding in fallow deer. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 71(2), 376–383. doi:10.1139/z93-052.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Andersson, M. (1994). Sexual selection. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Arnqvist, G., & Rowe, L. (2005). Sexual conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bateman, A. J. (1948). Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity, 2(3), 349–368. doi:10.1038/hdy.1948.21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bonduriansky, R., & Rowe, L. (2003). Interactions among mechanisms of sexual selection on male body size and head shape in a sexually dimorphic fly. Evolution, 57, 2046–2053.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bro-Jorgensen, J. (2007). The intensity of sexual selection predicts weapon size in male bovids. Evolution, 61, 1316–1326.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clutton-Brock, T. (2009). Sexual selection in females. Animal Behaviour, 77(1), 3–11. doi:10.1016/j.anbehav.2008.08.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Double, M., & Cockburn, A. (2000). Pre-dawn infidelity: Females control extra-pair mating in superb fairy-wrens. Proceedings of the Royal Society B-Biological Sciences, 267, 465–470.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Eberhard, W. G. (1979). The function of horns in Podischnus agenor (Dynastinae) and other beetles. In M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum (Eds.), Sexual selection and reproductive competition in insects (pp. 231–258). New York: Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Eberhard, W. G., Guzman-Gomez, S., & Catley, K. M. (1993). Correlation between spermathecal morphology and mating systems in spiders. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 50, 197–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Emlen, D. J. (1997). Alternative reproductive tactics and male dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 41, 335–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emlen, D. J. (2008). The evolution of animal weapons. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics, 39, 387–413. doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.39.110707.173502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fischer, K., & Fiedler, K. (2001). Resource-based territoriality in the butterfly Lycaena hippothoe and environmentally induced behavioural shifts. Animal Behaviour, 61, 723–732. doi:10.1006/anbe.2000.1662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Forsyth, A., & Montgomerie, R. D. (1987). Alternative reproductive tactics in the territorial damselfly Calopteryx-maculata – Sneaking by older males. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology, 21(2), 73–81. doi:10.1007/bf02395434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gwynne, D. T. (2007). Sexual conflict over nuptial gifts in insects. Annual Review of Entomology, 53, 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gwynne, D. T., & Simmons, L. W. (1990). Experimental reversal of courtship roles in an insect. Nature, 346(6280), 172–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jennions, M. D., & Petrie, M. (2000). Why do females mate multiply? A review of the genetic benefits. Biological Reviews, 75(1), 21–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Jormalainen, V. (1998). Precopulatory mate guarding in crustaceans: Male competitive strategy and intersexual conflict. Quarterly Review of Biology, 73(3), 275–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kokko, H., & Jennions, M. D. (2008). Parental investment, sexual selection and sex ratios. Journal of Evolutionary Biology, 21(4), 919–948. doi:10.1111/j.1420-9101.2008.01540.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Kvarnemo, C., & Anhesjo, I. (1996). The dynamics of operational sex ratios and competition for mates. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 11(10), 404–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Leimar, O., Austad, S., & Equist, M. (1991). A test of the sequential assessment game: Fighting in the bowl and doily spider Frontinella pyramitela. Evolution, 45(4), 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mendoza-Cuenca, L., & Macías-Ordóñez, R. (2010). Female asynchrony may drive disruptive sexual selection on male mating phenotypes in a Heliconius butterfly. Behavioral Ecology, 21(1), 144–152. doi:10.1093/beheco/arp163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Norman, M. D., Finn, J., & Tregenza, T. (1999). Female impersonation as an alternative reproductive strategy in giant cuttlefish. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences, 266(1426), 1347–1349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Oliveira, R. F., Taborsky, M., & Brockmann, H. J. (2008). Alternative reproductive tactics: An integrative approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Owens, I. P. F., Dixon, A., Burke, T., & Thompson, D. B. A. (1995). Strategic paternity assurance in the sex-role reversed Eurasian dotterel (Charadrius morinellus): Behavioural and genetic evidence. Behavioral Ecology, 6(1), 14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Stockley, P., & Bro-Jørgensen, J. (2011). Female competition and its evolutionary consequences in mammals. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 86, 341–366. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society, 88(2), 341–366.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Sutter, A., Simmons, L. W., Lindhom, A. K., & Firman, R. C. (2015). Function of copulatory plugs in house mice: Mating behavior and paternity outcomes of rival males. Behavioral Ecology, 27(1), 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man 1871–1971 (Vol. 136, pp. 136–179). Chicago: Aldine Press.Google Scholar
  30. Wong, B. B. M. (2004). Superior fighters make mediocre fathers in the Pacific blue-eye fish. Animal Behaviour, 67, 583–590.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Evolutionary Biology, School of Animal Biology, The University of Western AustraliaCrawleyAustralia