Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Sex Differences in Spatial Abilities

  • Guy MadisonEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_404-1

Synonyms

Definition

Differences between males and females in the faculty that processes neural representations of physical space, such as the orientation and movement of objects.

Introduction

Spatial ability (SA) is an overarching concept for a wide range of abilities that involve neural representation and manipulation of physical space. Examples include wayfinding, running, jumping, and ballistic feats, such as hitting game in hunt or enemies in warfare, as well as the invention and construction of machinery, writ large. While human (gonadal) sex differences in cognitive abilities are generally small, males systematically and substantially outperform females on tests of SA, with meta-analytic effect sizes in the range 0.48–0.94 (Linn...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Aleman, A., Bronk, E., Kessels, R. P. C., Koppeschaar, H. P. P., & van Honk, J. (2004). A single administration of testosterone improves visuospatial ability in young women. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 29, 612–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barel, E., & Tzischinsky, O. (2017). The role of sex hormones and of 2D:4D ratio in individual differences in cognitive abilities. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 29, 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barel, E., & Tzischinsky, O. (2018). Age and sex differences in verbal and visuospatial abilities. Advances in Cognitive Psychology, 14, 51–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Berenbaum, S. A., & Beltz, A. M. (2016). How early hormones shape gender development. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 7, 53–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blanch, A., Aluja, A., & Cornado, M.-P. (2015). Sex differences in chess performance: Analyzing participation rates, age, and practice in chess tournaments. Personality and Individual Differences, 86, 117–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Casey, M. B., Nuttall, R. L., Pezaris, E., & Benbow, C. P. (1995). The influence of spatial ability on gender differences in mathematics college entrance test scores across diverse samples. Developmental Psychology, 31, 697–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Celec, P., Ostatníkova, D., Putz, Z., & Kudela, M. (2002). The circalunar cycle of salivary testosterone and the visual-spatial performance. Bratislava Medical Journal, 103, 59–69.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Christiansen, K., & Knussmann, R. (1987). Sex hormones and cognitive functioning in men. Neuropsychobiology, 18, 27–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Gur, R. C., & Gur, R. E. (2017). Complementarity of sex differences in brain and behavior: From laterality to multimodal neuroimaging. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 189–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gur, R. C., Richard, J., Calkins, M., Chiavacci, R., Hansen, J. A., Bilker, W. B., et al. (2012). Age group and sex differences in performance on a computerized neurocognitive battery in children age 8–21. Neuropsychology, 26, 251–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Halari, R., Hines, M., Kumari, V., Mehrotra, R., Wheeler, M., Ng, V., et al. (2005). Sex differences and individual differences in cognitive performance and their relationship to endogenous gonadal hormones and gonadotropins. Behavioral Neuroscience, 119, 104–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hampson, E., & Rovet, J. F. (2015). Spatial function in adolescents and young adults with congenital adrenal hyperplasia: Clinical phenotype and implications for the androgen hypothesis. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 54, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hampson, E., Ellis, C. L., & Tenk, C. M. (2008). On the relation between 2D:4D and sex-dimorphic personality traits. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 133–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harrison, C. R. (2000). Gender and menstrual cycle effects in human spatial cognition. Dissertation Abstracts International: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering, 61, 2789.Google Scholar
  15. Heilbronner, N. (2013). The STEM pathway for women: What has changed? Gifted Child Quarterly, 57, 39–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hirnstein, M., Hugdahl, K., & Hausmann, M. (2019). Cognitive sex differences and hemispheric asymmetry: A critical review of 40 years of research. Laterality: Asymmetries of Body, Brain and Cognition, 24, 204–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Li, L. (2014). Why women see differently from the way men see? A review of sex differences in cognition and sports. Journal of Sport and Health Science, 3, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lippa, R. (2010a). Gender differences in personality and interests: When, where, and why? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4, 1098–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lippa, R. (2010b). Sex differences in personality traits and gender-related occupational preferences across 53 nations: Testing evolutionary and social-environmental theories. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 619–636.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lynn, R. (1994). Sex differences in intelligence and brain size: A paradox resolved. Personality and Individual Differences, 17, 257–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Peers, S. (2016). Statistics on women in engineering. Stevenage: The Women’s Engineering Society.Google Scholar
  23. Pintzka, C., Evensmoen, H., Lehn, H., & Haberg, A. (2016). Changes in spatial cognition and brain activity after a single dose of testosterone in healthy women. Behavioural Brain Research, 298, 78–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reilly, D., & Neumann, D. L. (2013). Gender-role differences in spatial ability: A meta-analytic review. Sex Roles, 68, 521–535.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Reilly, D., Neumann, D. L., & Andrews, G. (2015). Sex and sex-role differences in specific cognitive abilities. Intelligence, 54, 147–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Signorella, M., & Jamison, W. (1986). Masculinity, femininity, androgyny, and cognitive performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 100, 207–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Silverman, I., Choi, J., Mackewn, A., Fisher, M., Moro, J., & Olshansky, E. (2000). Evolved mechanisms underlying wayfinding: Further studies on the hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 21, 201–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Silverman, I., Choi, J., & Peters, M. (2007). The hunter-gatherer theory of sex differences in spatial abilities: Data from 40 countries. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 36, 261–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Su, R., & Rounds, J. (2015). All STEM fields are not created equal: People and things interests explain gender disparities across STEM fields. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Valla, J., & Ceci, S. J. (2011). Can sex differences in science be tied to the long reach of prenatal hormones? Brain organization theory, digit ratio (2D/4D), and sex differences in preferences and cognition. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6, 134–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Valla, J., & Ceci, S. J. (2014). Breadth-based models of women’s underrepresentation in STEM fields: An integrative commentary on Schmidt (2011) and Nye et al. (2012). Perspectives on Psychological Science, 9, 219–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Voyer, D., Voyer, S. D., & Bryden, M. P. (1995). Magnitude of sex-differences in spatial abilities – a metaanalysis and consideration of critical variables. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wai, J., Hodges, J., & Makel, M. C. (2018). Sex differences in ability tilt in the right tail of cognitive abilities: A 35-year examination. Intelligence, 67, 76–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wiking, S., Brattfjell, M., Iversen, E. E., Malinowska, K., Mikkelsen, R., Roed, L. P., et al. (2016). Sex differences in furniture assembly performance: An experimental study. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 30, 226–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Zell, E., Krizan, Z., & Teeter, S. R. (2015). Evaluating gender similarities and differences using metasynthesis. American Psychologist, 70, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Umeå UniversityUmeåSweden

Section editors and affiliations

  • Haley Dillon
    • 1
  1. 1.Marist CollegePoughkeepsieUSA