Skip to main content

Reciprocal Altruism and Group Living

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Direct reciprocity and group formation; Group living; Reciprocal cooperation; Reciprocity

Definition

Self-costly acts that confer benefits on others are reciprocated by the recipients such that a mutual benefit is gained. This reciprocal favoritism may be a mechanism relevant to the formation and persistence of group living.

Introduction

Group living is an elemental part of human life and is essential for the survival and replication of our species. Thanks to group living we have been more effective in hunting and protecting ourselves from predators through cooperation. One peculiar phenomenon observed in human group living is that individuals provide self-costly and seemingly altruistic benefits to other group members. For instance, someone might save a group member from drowning (benefit to the recipient) and thereby risking his/her own life (cost to the helper). Humans show such kind of behaviors even toward genetically unrelated others, such that inclusive fitness and kin...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Axelrod, R., & Hamilton, W. D. (1981). The evolution of cooperation. Science, 211, 1390–1396.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, R. (1988). Is the repeated prisoner’s dilemma a good model of reciprocal altruism? Ethology and Sociobiology, 9, 211–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). Cognitive adaptations for social exchange. In J. Barkow, L. Cosmides, & J. Tooby (Eds.), The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture (pp. 162–228). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gintis, H. (2000). Strong reciprocity in human sociality. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 206, 169–179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, W. D. (1964). The genetical evolution of social behaviour. I and II. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 7, 17–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1992). Tit for tat in heterogeneous populations. Nature, 355, 250–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A., & Sigmund, K. (1998). Evolution of indirect reciprocity by image scoring. Nature, 393, 573–577.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. L. (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. Quarterly Review of Biology, 46, 35–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamagishi, T., Jin, N., & Kiyonari, T. (1999). Bounded generalized reciprocity: Ingroup boasting and ingroup favoritism. Advances in Group Processes, 16, 161–197.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maik M. P. Theelen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Theelen, M.M.P., Böhm, R. (2016). Reciprocal Altruism and Group Living. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3723-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3723-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics