Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Observed Mating Behavior and Women’s Long-Term Mating

  • Natalie V. Motta-MenaEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3657-1

Synonyms

Definition

Women’s mating behavior includes human female sexual development, mate preferences, and strategies to optimize reproduction and long-term mating. Each of these components of mating behavior has been shaped by selection to produce adaptive outcomes.

Introduction

A life history approach to evaluating human behavior can be fruitful for understanding the fundamentally unique nature of women’s mating behavior (Luoto et al. 2018; Motta-Mena and Puts 2017). For example, early in development, puberty in humans marks a formative time during which changes in the visuoperceptual system can influence the ability to detect facial cues related to mating behavior and sexual relationships (e.g., sexual interest; Garcia and Scherf 2015; Motta-Mena and Scherf 2017), a crucial developmental transition that, thus far, appears to be exclusive to humans. As young women undergo puberty and begin menstruation, they begin to exhibit...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Arslan, A. R. C., Schilling, K. M., & Gerlach, T. M. (2017). Using 26 thousand diary entries to show ovulatory changes in sexual desire and behaviour (pp. 1–77).  https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/JP2YM.
  2. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X00023992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Conroy-Beam, D., Buss, D. M., Pham, M. N., & Shackelford, T. K. (2015). How sexually dimorphic are human mate preferences? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1082–1093.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167215590987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Dahl, R. E. (2004). Adolescent brain development: A period of vulnerabilities and opportunities – Keynote Address. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1196/annals.1308.001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dijkstra, P., & Buunk, B. P. (2002). Sex differences in the jealousy-evoking effect of rival characteristics. European Journal of Social Psychology, 32(6), 829–852.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Durante, K. M., Li, N. P., & Haselton, M. G. (2008). Changes in women’s choice of dress across the ovulatory cycle: Naturalistic and laboratory task-based evidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1451–1460.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208323103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Fink, B., Klappauf, D., Brewer, G., & Shackelford, T. K. (2014). Female physical characteristics and intra-sexual competition in women. Personality and Individual Differences, 58, 138–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2013.10.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fisher, M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 271(Suppl), S283–S285.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rsbl.2004.0160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Garcia, N. V., & Scherf, K. S. (2015). Emerging sensitivity to socially complex expressions: A unique role for adolescence? Child Development Perspectives, 0(0), 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(2).  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Graziano, W. G., Jensen-Campbell, L. A., Shebilske, L. J., & Lundgren, S. R. (1993). Social influence, sex differences, and judgments of beauty: Putting the interpersonal back in interpersonal attraction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(3), 522–531.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.3.522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Grumbach, M. M., & Styne, D. M. (1998). Puberty: Ontogeny, neuroendocrinology, physiology, and disorders. In Williams textbook of endocrinology (pp. 1509–1625). Philadelphia: Saunders.Google Scholar
  13. Haselton, M. G., & Gangestad, S. W. (2006). Conditional expression of women’s desires and men’s mate guarding across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 49(4), 509–518.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2005.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Jasieńska, G., Ziomkiewicz, A., Ellison, P. T., Lipson, S. F., & Thune, I. (2004). Large breasts and narrow waists indicate high reproductive potential in women. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 271(1545), 1213–1217.  https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2004.2712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., … DeBruine, L. M. (2017). No evidence that more physically attractive women have higher estradiol or progesterone. BioRxiv, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.1101/136515.
  16. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., & DeBruine, L. M. (2018a). General sexual desire, but not desire for uncommitted sexual relationships, tracks changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 88, 153–157.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psyneuen.2017.12.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., Fisher, C. I., Wang, H., Kandrik, M., Han, C., Fasolt, V., Morrison, D., Lee, A. J., Holzleitner, I. J., Shea, K. J. O., Roberts, S. C., Little, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2018b). no compelling evidence that preferences for facial masculinity track changes in women’s hormonal status. Psychological Science, 29(6), 996–1005.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618760197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Junger, J., Motta-Mena, N. V., Cardenas, R., Bailey, D., Rosenfield, K. A., Schild, C., Penke, L., & Puts, D. A. (2018). Do women’s preferences for masculine voices shift across the ovulatory cycle?, 0, 1–53.  https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/k9y7s.
  19. Jünger, J., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2018a). No evidence for ovulatory cycle shifts in women’s preferences for men’s behaviors in a pre-registered study, (March).  https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7G3XC
  20. Jünger, J., Kordsmeyer, T. L., Gerlach, T. M., & Penke, L. (2018b). Fertile women evaluate male bodies as more attractive, regardless of masculinity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 412–423.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kordsmeyer, T. L., Hunt, J., Puts, D. A., Ostner, J., & Penke, L. (2018). The relative importance of intra- and intersexual selection on human male sexually dimorphic traits. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(4), 424–436.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2018.03.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lanska, D. J., Lanska, M. J., Hartz, A. J., & Rimm, A. A. (1984). Factors influencing anatomic location of fat tissue in 52,953 women. International Journal of Obesity, 9(1), 29–38.Google Scholar
  23. Larson, C. M., Haselton, M. G., Gildersleeve, K. A., & Pillsworth, E. G. (2013). Changes in women’s feelings about their romantic relationships across the ovulatory cycle. Hormones and Behavior, 63(1).  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.10.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Luoto, S., Krams, I., & Rantala, M. J. (2018). A life history approach to the female sexual orientation spectrum: Evolution, development, causal mechanisms, and health. Archives of Sexual Behavior. Springer US.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1261-0
  25. Marcinkowska, U. M., Ellison, P. T., Galbarczyk, A., Milkowska, K., Pawlowski, B., Thune, I., & Jasienska, G. (2016). Lack of support for relation between woman’s masculinity preference, estradiol level and mating context. Hormones and Behavior, 78, 1–7.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2015.10.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Marshall, W. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1969). Variations in pattern of pubertal changes in girls. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 44(235), 291–303.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.45.239.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Marshall, W. A., & Tanner, J. M. (1970). Variations in the pattern of pubertal changes in boys. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 45(239), 13–23.  https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.45.239.13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Motta-Mena, N. V., & Puts, D. A. (2017). Endocrinology of human female sexuality, mating, and reproductive behavior. Hormones and Behavior, 91, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Motta-Mena, N. V., & Scherf, K. S. (2017). Pubertal development shapes perception of complex facial expressions. Developmental Science, 20(4).Google Scholar
  30. Muñoz-Reyes, J. A., Iglesias-Julios, M., Martín-Elola, C., Losada-Pérez, M., Monedero, I., Pita, M., & Turiégano, E. (2014). Changes in preference for male faces during the menstrual cycle in a Spanish population. Anales de Psicologia, 30(2), 667–675.  https://doi.org/10.6018/analesps.30.2.145221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Nadler, R. D., Collins, D. C., Miller, L. C., & Graham, C. E. (1983). Menstrual cycle patterns of hormones and sexual behavior in gorillas. Hormones and Behavior, 17(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Peters, M., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2009). Preferences across the menstrual cycle for masculinity and symmetry in photographs of male faces and bodies. PLoS One, 4(1), e4138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Puts, D. a. (2010). Beauty and the beast: Mechanisms of sexual selection in humans. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(3), 157–175.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Schulz, K. M., Richardson, H. N., Zehr, J. L., Osetek, A. J., Menard, T. A., & Sisk, C. L. (2004). Gonadal hormones masculinize and defeminize reproductive behaviors during puberty in the male Syrian hamster. Hormones and Behavior, 45(4), 242–249.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2003.12.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Shirazi, T. N., Bossio, J. A., Puts, D. A., & Chivers, M. L. (2018a). Menstrual cycle phase predicts women’s hormonal responses to sexual stimuli. Hormones and Behavior, 103(June), 45–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yhbeh.2018.05.023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Shirazi, T. N., Puts, D. A., & Escasa-Dorne, M. J. (2018b). Filipino women’s preferences for male voice pitch: Intra-individual, life history, and hormonal predictors. Adaptive Human Behavior and Physiology, 4(2), 188–206.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40750-018-0087-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of waist-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(2), 293–307.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.65.2.293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Thornhill, R., & Gangestad, S. W. (2015). The functional design and phylogeny of women’s sexuality. In T. K. Shackelford & R. D. Hansen (Eds.), The evolution of sexuality – 8 (pp. 149–184). Springer International Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09384-0_8.Google Scholar
  39. Trivers, R. L. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. Chicago: Aldine.Google Scholar
  40. Wang, H., Hahn, A. C., DeBruine, L. M., & Jones, B. C. (2016). Do partnered women discriminate men’s faces less along the attractiveness dimension? Personality and Individual Differences, 98(August), 153–156.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2016.04.024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Watkins, C. D., Nicholls, M. J., Batres, C., Xiao, D., Talamas, S., & Perrett, D. I. (2017). Own attractiveness and perceived relationship quality shape sensitivity in women’s memory for other men on the attractiveness dimension. Cognition, 163, 146–154.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.03.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Wood, W., Kressel, L., Joshi, P. D., & Louie, B. (2014). Meta-analysis of menstrual cycle effects on women’s mate preferences. Emotion Review, 6(3), 229–249.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914523073.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Van Noord, P. A., te Velde, E. R., Habbema, J. D., Vrieswijk, B., & Karbaat, J. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. BMJ, 306(6876), 484–487.  https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.306.6876.484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyThe Pennsylvania State UniversityUniversity ParkUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tara DeLecce
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA