Definition
Sociosexuality was originally designed to capture individual differences in people’s willingness to engage in sexual behavior outside a formally/informally committed relationship. Work on the construct has moved from simple one-dimensional models, to models that incorporate the behavioral, attitudinal, and behavioral intention aspects of motivations to engage in casual sex, to, finally, encompassing an expansive model that describes a two-dimensional coordinate system composed of short-term mating interest and long-term mating interest. This model is especially useful in examining the emergent nature of the variety of apparent relationships that characterize the sexual landscape today.
Introduction
Since Kinsey (circa 1953), it has been clear that there is a wide variety of sexual behaviors men and women engage in. Despite this, there is a pervasive myth of heterosexual monogamy in...
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.
Gangestad, S. W., & Simpson, J. A. (2000). The evolution of human mating: Trade-offs and strategic pluralism. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 573–644.
Jackson, J. J., & Kirkpatrick, L. A. (2007). The structure and measurement of human mating strategies: Toward a multidimensional model of sociosexuality. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 382–391.
Jonason, P. K. (2013). Four functions for four relationships: Consensus definitions in university students. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 42, 1407–1414.
Jonason, P. K., & Balzarini, R. (2016). Unweaving the rainbow of human sexuality. In K. Aumer (Ed.), The psychology of love and hate in intimate relationships (pp. 13–28). New York: Springer.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Cason, M. J. (2009). The “booty call”: A compromise between men and women’s ideal mating strategies. Journal of Sex Research, 46, 1–11.
Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., & Richardson, J. (2010). Positioning the booty-call on the spectrum of relationships: Sexual but more emotional than one-night stands. Journal of Sex Research, 47, 1–10.
Jonason, P. K., Valentine, K. A., & Li, N. P. (2012). Human mating. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of human behavior (2nd ed., Vol. 2, pp. 371–377). Oxford, UK: Academic.
Li, N. P., Bailey, J. M., Kenrick, D. T., & Linsenmeier, J. A. W. (2002). The necessities and luxuries of mate preferences: Testing the tradeoffs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 947–955.
Penke, L., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2008). Beyond global sociosexual orientations: A more differentiated look at sociosexuality and its effects on courtship and romantic relationships. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(5), 1113–1135.
Simpson, J. A., & Gangestad, S. W. (1991). Individual differences in sociosexuality: Evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(6), 870–883.
Webster, G. D., & Bryan, A. (2007). Sociosexual attitudes and behaviors: why two factors are better than one. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 917–922.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Jonason, P.K. (2016). Relationship Choices and Sexuality. In: Weekes-Shackelford, V., Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3623-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3623-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences