Noam Chomsky and Linguistics
The impact of Noam Chomsky on the field of linguistics, particularly the evolution of language.
Noam Chomsky (born December 7, 1928) is one of the most influential contemporary thinkers. His huge impact surpasses linguistics to include psychology, philosophy, or computer science, among other fields. The advent of Chomsky’s generative grammar in the second half of the twentieth century challenged the traditional view that considered language to be a purely cultural trait deriving from our great intelligence and unlimited learning capacities, by claiming that language is an innate trait, part of the human biological endowment.
It would be hard to provide an overall presentation of Chomsky’s linguistic work, for it has been crucial in many topics: nativism, language and mind, universal grammar, the poverty of the stimulus, language acquisition, language structure, etc. All of these topics have been widely discussed and are...
KeywordsLanguage Evolution Computational System Animal Communication Minimalist Program Universal Grammar
- Balari, S., & Lorenzo, G. (2013). Computational phenotypes. Towards an evolutionary developmental biolinguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bateson, P. (2001). Behavioral development and Darwinian evolution. In S. Oyama, P. E. Griffiths, & R. D. Gray (Eds.), Cycles of contingencies. Developmental systems and evolution (pp. 149–166). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Berwick, R., & Chomsky, N. (2011). The biolinguistic program: The current state of its development. In A. M. Di Sciullo & C. Boeckx (Eds.), The biolinguistic enterprise. New perspectives on the evolution and nature of the human language faculty (pp. 19–41). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Bickerton, D. (1990). Language and species. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Chomsky, N. (1980). Rules and representations. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
- Chomsky, N. (1995). The minimalist program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Chomsky, N. (2007). Approaching UG from below. In U. Sauerland & H.-M. Gärtner (Eds.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics (pp. 1–29). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. (1995). Darwin’s dangerous idea. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds. Toward an understanding of consciousness. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Goodwin, B. (1994). How the leopard changed its spots. The evolution of complexity. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
- Gottlieb, G. (1997). Synthesizing nature-nurture. Prenatal roots of instinctive behavior. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Lieberman, P. (2006). Toward an evolutionary biology of language. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
- Longa, V. M. (2012). Lenguaje humano y comunicación animal: análisis comparativo. Bucaramanga: Universidad Industrial de Santander.Google Scholar
- Longa, V. M., & Lorenzo, G. (2012). Theoretical linguistics meets development: Explaining FL from an epigenicist point of view. In C. Boeckx, M. C. Horno-Chéliz, & J. L. Mendívil-Giró (Eds.), Language, from a biological point of view. Current issues in biolinguistics (pp. 52–84). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
- Longa, V. M., Lorenzo, G., & Uriagereka, J. (2011). Minimizing language evolution. The Minimalist Program and the evolutionary shaping of language. In C. Boeckx (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of linguistic minimalism (pp. 595–616). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Tallerman, M., & Gibson, K. (Eds.). (2012). The Oxford handbook of language evolution. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Wimsatt, W. (1999). Generativity, entrenchment, evolution, and innateness: Philosophy, evolutionary biology, and conceptual foundations of science. In V. Hardcastle (Ed.), Where biology meets psychology. Philosophical essays (pp. 139–179). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar