Skip to main content

Sex Differences in Attachment

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Definition

There is some evidence that men and women have moderately different distributions of insecure adult attachment styles. Generally, men may tend to report higher avoidance and women may tend to report higher ambivalence, but these findings are somewhat inconsistent and controversial.

Introduction

Although controversial, there is some empirical evidence that there may be small to moderate sex differences in adult attachment and that these differences may be first evident during middle childhood. Despite the controversy, I would propose that the suggestion that there may be sex differences in attachment should not be surprising. It is well accepted that women and men tend to be socialized differently from birth (Bem 1993) and, as a result, men are typically less emotional and less nurturing than women. Furthermore, there is support that women and men may perceive social interactions differently and consequently behave differently in their relationships. Despite the proposal...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bakermans-Kranenburg, M. J., & van IJzendoorn, M. H. (2009). The first 10,000 adult attachment interviews: Distributions of adult attachment representations in clinical and non-clinical groups. Attachment & Human Development, 11, 223–263.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, K., & Horowitz, L. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: A test of a four-category model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 226–244.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bem, S. L. (1993). The lenses of gender: Transforming the debate on sexual inequality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bodner, E., Bergman, Y. S., & Cohen-Fridel, S. (2014). Do attachment styles affect the presence and search for meaning in life? Journal of Happiness Studies, 15, 1041–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brennan, K. A., Clark, C. L., & Shaver, P. R. (1998). Self-report measurement of adult attachment: An integrative overview. In J. A. Simpson & W. S. Rholes (Eds.), Attachment theory and close relationships (pp. 46–76). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M. (2008). Sex-biased ratio of avoidant/ambivalent attachment in middle childhood. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 26, 369–379.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M. (2009). Sex, attachment, and the development of reproductive strategies. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 1–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M. (2011). Sex differences in romantic attachment: A meta-analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 193–214.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Del Giudice, M., & Belsky, J. (2010). Sex differences in attachment emerge in middle childhood: An evolutionary hypothesis. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 97–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraley, R. C., Waller, N. G., & Brennan, K. A. (2000). An item response theory analysis of self-report measures of adult attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 350–365.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hazan, C., & Shaver, P. R. (1987). Romantic love conceptualized as an attachment process. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 511–524.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen, K., Punamäki, R., & Qouta, S. (2003). Adult attachment and emotional responses to traumatic memories among Palestinian former political prisoners. Traumatology, 9, 127–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikulincer, M., & Florian, V. (1999). Maternal–fetal bonding, coping strategies, and mental health during pregnancy: The contribution of attachment style. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 18, 255–276.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rholes, W. S., Simpson, J. A., & Oriña, M. M. (1999). Attachment and anger in an anxiety-provoking situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 940–957.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Scharfe, E., & Bartholomew, K. (1994). Reliability and stability of adult attachment patterns. Personal Relationships, 1, 23–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P., Alcalay, L., Allensworth, M., Allik, J., Ault, L., Austers, I., et al. (2003). Are men universally more dismissing than women? Gender differences in romantic attachment across 62 cultural regions. Personal Relationships, 10, 307–331.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Ickes, W., & Grich, J. (1999). When accuracy hurts: Reactions of anxious–ambivalent dating partners to a relationship-threatening situation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 754–769.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, J. A., Rholes, W. S., Oriña, M. M., & Grich, J. (2002). Working models of attachment, support giving, and support seeking in a stressful situation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 598–608.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, R. A. (2010). Attachment and life history theory: A rejoinder. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 106–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van IJzendoorn, M. H., & Bakermans–Kranenburg, M. J. (2010). Stretched until it snaps: Attachment and close relationships. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 109–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elaine Scharfe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Scharfe, E. (2016). Sex Differences in Attachment. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3592-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_3592-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics