Skip to main content

Effect of Status on Social Reasoning (Cummins 1998)

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 53 Accesses

Synonyms

Domain-specific reasoning about dominance hierarchies

Definition

The effect of social hierarchy and status position on the evolution and implementation of social reasoning abilities.

Introduction

Sociality, the formation of social groups by a species, is often seen as an evolved solution to some of life’s most basic problems, such as how to obtain food, how to successfully reproduce and care for young, and how to avoid predation long enough for these prior concerns to be issues at all. While helping to solve many of these problems, sociality also presents a unique challenge: how are limited resources, such as food, to be distributed among group members? In response, many social species, including humans, developed social hierarchies wherein higher-status individuals typically have priority access to resources. Therefore, while sociality and social hierarchy helped solve some evolutionary problems, they themselves produced unique evolutionary pressures. In this context, Cummins...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altmann, J., Alberts, S. C., Haines, S. A., Dubach, J., Muruth, P., Coote, T., Geffen, E., Cheesman, D. J., Mututua, R. A., Saiyalel, S. N., Wayne, R. K., Lacy, R. C., & Bruford, M. W. (1996). Behavior predicts genetic structure in a wild primate group. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 93, 5795–5801.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbey, A. K., Krueger, F., & Grafman, J. (2009). An evolutionarily adaptive neural architecture for social reasoning. Trends in Neurosciences, 32(12), 603–610. doi:10.1016/j.tins.2009.09.001.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P. (2008). Enhanced recognition of defectors depends on their rarity. Cognition, 107(3), 817–828. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.11.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barclay, P., & Lalumière, M. (2006). Do people differentially remember cheaters? Human Nature, 17(1), 98–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron-Cohen, S. (1995). Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blader, S. L., & Chen, Y. R. (2014). What’s in a name? Status, power, and other forms of social hierarchy. In The psychology of social status (pp. 71–95). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, D. E. (1991). Human universals. Temple University Press. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchner, A., Bell, R., Mehl, B., & Musch, J. (2009). No enhanced recognition memory, but better source memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 30(3), 212–224. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2009.01.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiappe, D., Dow, B., Koontz, J., Rodriguez, M., & Mcculloch, K. (2004). Cheaters are looked at longer and remembered better than cooperators in social exchange situations. Evolutionary Psychology, 2, 108–120. doi:10.1177/147470490400200117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D. (1996). Evidence of deontic reasoning in 3- and 4-year-olds. Memory & Cognition, 24, 823–829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D. (1998). Social norms and other minds: The evolutionary roots of higher cognition. In D. D. Cummins & C. A. Allen (Eds.), The evolution of mind (pp. 30–50). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D. (1999a). Early emergence of cheater detection in human development. Presented at the 11th Annual Meeting of the Human Behavior and Evolution Society, Salt Lake City, Utah, June 8, 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. D. (1999b). Cheater detection is modified by social rank: The impact of dominance on the evolution of cognitive functions. Evolution and Human Behavior, 20(4), 229–248.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. (2000). How the social environment shaped the evolution of mind. Synthese, 122(1), 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, D. (2006). Dominance, status, and social hierarchies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), Handbook of evolutionary psychology (pp. 676–697). Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Grosset/Putnam.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunbar, R. I. M. (1993). Coevolution of neocortical size, group size, and language in humans. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16, 681–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, J. (1988). The beginnings of social understanding. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, L. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology & Sociobiology, 16, 257–333.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, D. G., & Arbel, T. (1980). Group formation by two-year-olds. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 3, 287–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harcourt, A. H., & De Waal, F. B. M. (Eds.). (1992). Coalitions and alliances in humans and other animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris, P. L., & Nuñez, M. (1996). Understanding of permission rules by preschool children. Child Development, 67, 1572–1591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hokanson, J. E., & Shetler, S. (1961). The effect of overt aggression on physiological arousal. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 446–448.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, E. L., & Mehta, P. H. (2014). Hormones and hierarchies. In The psychology of social status (pp. 269–301). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, A. A., Blair, K. S., Jones, M. M., Soliman, N., & Blair, R. J. (2009). Dominance and submission: The ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and responses to status cues. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 713–724. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21052.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Mealey, L., Daood, C., & Krage, M. (1996). Enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Ethology and Sociobiology, 17(2), 119–128. doi:10.1016/0162-3095(95)00131-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehl, B., & Buchner, A. (2008). No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29(1), 35–41. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2007.08.001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pornpattananangkul, N., Zink, C. F., & Chiao, J. Y. (2014). Neural basis of social status hierarchy. In The psychology of social status (pp. 303–323). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. K. (1988). The cognitive demands of children’s social interactions with peers. In R. W. Byrne & A. Whiten (Eds.), Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys apes and humans (pp. 94–110). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strayer, F. F., & Trudel, M. (1984). Developmental changes in the nature and function of social dominance among young children. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5, 279–295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Kruepke .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Kruepke, M., Barbey, A. (2016). Effect of Status on Social Reasoning (Cummins 1998). In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2634-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2634-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics