Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Men’s Egoistic Dominant Acts

  • Zachary H. GarfieldEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2614-1



Males display a sex-specific pattern of expressions of dominance, which is a universal feature of human psychology.


Dominance is the use of aggression, threats, fear, and intimidation to maintain or achieve positions of social influence (Henrich and Gil-White 2001), and evidence suggests there are important sex differences in the expression of dominance (Buss 1981). Among social animals, dominance is a common mechanism by which multiple individuals produce a linear hierarchy of social rank. When dominance-based strategies are successful, stronger, larger individuals are more likely to attain a disproportionate level of power and influence within the social group (Lukaszewski et al. 2016). Among humans, cultural and ecological context plays an important role in the viability of dominance-based strategies, and among mobile egalitarian foragers, untethered subsistence coupled with an ethos of equality...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Boehm, C. (1993). Egalitarian behavior and reverse dominance hierarchy. Current Anthropology Current Anthropology, 34(3), 227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buss, D. M. (1981). Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chapais, B. (2015). Competence and the evolutionary origins of status and power in humans. Human Nature (Hawthorne, N.Y.), 26(2), 161–183. doi:10.1007/s12110-015-9227-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Foulsham, T., Kingstone, A., & Henrich, J. (2013). Two ways to the top: Evidence that dominance and prestige are distinct yet viable avenues to social rank and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(1), 103–125. doi:10.1037/a0030398.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hill, J. (1984). Prestige and reproductive success in man. Ethology and Sociobiology, 5(2), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kaplan, H. S., Hooper, P. L., & Gurven, M. (2009). The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3289–3299.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Lukaszewski, A. W., Simmons, Z. L., Anderson, C., & Roney, J. R. (2016). The role of physical formidability in human social status allocation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 110(3), 385–406. doi:10.1037/pspi0000042.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Neel, J. V. (1980). On being headman. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 23, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. von Rueden, C.R., & Jaeggi, A.V. (2016). Men’s status and reproductive success in 33 nonindustrial societies: Effects of subsistence, marriage system, and reproductive strategy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, 201606800.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington State UniversityVancouverUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jessica Hehman
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of RedlandsRedlandsUSA