Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Women’s Prosocial Dominant Acts

  • Zachary H. GarfieldEmail author
  • Melissa J. Garfield
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2613-1



Females display a sex-specific pattern of expressions of dominance, which is a universal feature of human psychology.


Dominance is a common strategy for achieving social influence across social species, including among humans. Dominance can be defined as the use of aggression, threats, fear, and intimidation to attain and maintain disproportionate levels of influence within a social group (Barkow 1989), and evidence suggests there are important sex differences in the expression of dominance (Buss 1981). Among sexually dimorphic species, females are often at a disadvantage concerning dominance-based strategies for achieving social influence (Archer 1988). This disadvantage can be compounded by sociocultural factors limiting female political participation (Rosaldo 1974). However, a close review of experimental literature and social systems in small-scale society reveals that women do...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Archer, J. (1988). The behavioural biology of aggression (Vol. 1). CUP Archive. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Barkow, J. H. (1989). Darwin, sex, and status. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown, J. K. (1970). A note on the division of labor by sex. American Anthropologist, 72(5), 1073–1078.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, J. K. (1985). Lives of middle aged women. In J. K. Brown & V. Kern (Eds.), In her prime: A new view of middle-aged women (pp. 17–30). South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1981). Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 147–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A. (1999). Staying alive: Evolution, culture, and women’s intrasexual aggression. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22(02), 203–214.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Hawley, H., Little, D., & Card, A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 76–88. doi: 10.1177/0165025407084054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Hess, N., Helfrecht, C., Hagen, E., Sell, A., & Hewlett, B. (2010). Interpersonal aggression among Aka hunter-gatherers of the Central African Republic. Human Nature, 21(3), 330–354. doi: 10.1007/s12110-010-9094-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hewlett, B. S. (1991). Demography and childcare in preindustrial societies. Journal of Anthropological Research, 47(1), 1–37.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rosaldo, M. Z. (1974). Woman, culture, and society: A theoretical overview. In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture and society (pp. 17–43). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyWashington State UniversityVancouverUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jessica Hehman
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of RedlandsRedlandsUSA