Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Dominant Acts Expressed (Buss 1981)

  • Zachary H. Garfield
Living reference work entry

Later version available View entry history

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2612-1

Synonyms

Definition

Psychological research suggests men and women employ sex-specific strategies for expressing dominance, and dominant acts are perceived differently based on the sex of the actor. The nature of sex differences in dominance-based behavior, variation in personality and dominance, and ethnographic accounts of dominance in leadership positions are discussed.

Introduction

The role of dominance in the formation of hierarchy is an ancestral feature of social organization humans share with nonhuman primates as well as social animals generally. As a strategy for achieving influence, dominance is likely a cross-cultural universal, yet there are stark sex differences and cultural variation in the universal expression of dominance.

Dominance consists of gaining authority through the use of coercion, fear, aggression, or agonistic threats by social superiors to subordinates (Cheng et al. 2010; Henrich and Gil-White 2001). Patterns of...

Keywords

Social Influence Relational Aggression Dominant Behavior Dominance Behavior Egalitarian Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Austen, L. (1940). Botabalu: A Trobriand chieftainess. Mankind, 2, 270–273.Google Scholar
  2. Bakan, D. (1966). The duality of human existence: Isolation and communion in western man. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  3. Boehm, C. (1999). Hierarchy in the forest: The evolution of egalitarian behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, J. K., & Kerns, V. (1985). In her prime: A new view of middle-aged women. South Hadley: Bergin and Garvey Publishers. 1985.Google Scholar
  5. Buss, D. M. (1981). Sex differences in the evaluation and performance of dominant acts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(1), 147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Campbell, A. (2002). A mind of her own: The evolutionary psychology of women. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Henrich, J. (2010). Pride, personality, and the evolutionary foundations of human social status. Evolution and Human Behavior, 31(5), 334–347. doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.02.004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., & Anderson, C. (2014). The psychology of social status. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Earle, T. K. (1997). How chiefs come to power: The political economy in prehistory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Hawley, P. H. (2003). Strategies of control, aggression, and morality in preschoolers: An evolutionary perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 85(3), 213–235.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Hawley, H., Little, D., & Card, A. (2008). The myth of the alpha male: A new look at dominance-related beliefs and behaviors among adolescent males and females. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 32(1), 76–88. doi:10.1177/0165025407084054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Henrich, J., & Gil-White, F. J. (2001). The evolution of prestige: Freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evolution and Human Behavior, 22(3), 165–196.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hess, N. H., & Hagen, E. H. (2006). Sex differences in indirect aggression psychological evidence from young adults. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(3), 231–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hess, N., Helfrecht, C., Hagen, E., Sell, A., & Hewlett, B. (2010). Interpersonal aggression among Aka hunter-gatherers of the Central African Republic. Human Nature, 21(3), 330–354. doi:10.1007/s12110-010-9094-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hoben, A. (1963). Role of ambilineal descent groups in Gojjam Amhara social organization. Ann Arbor: University Microfilms.Google Scholar
  16. Kaplan, H. S., Hooper, P. L., & Gurven, M. (2009). The evolutionary and ecological roots of human social organization. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, B: Biological Sciences, 364(1533), 3289–3299.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Richards Audrey I. (1940). Political system of the Bemba Tribe: North-Eastern Rhodesia. African Political Systems. Publication for the international institute of African languages & Cultures by the Oxford University Press, H. Milford. Retrieved from http://ehrafworldcultures.yale.edu/document?id=fq05-007
  18. Sandin, B. (1967). Sea Dayaks of Borneo: Before white rajah rule. London: MacMillan & Co. Ltd..Google Scholar
  19. Turnbull, C. M. (1965). Wayward servants: The two worlds of the African pygmies. Garden City: The Natural History Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Washington State UniversityVancouverUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Jessica Hehman
    • 1
  1. 1.Psychology DepartmentUniversity of RedlandsRedlandsUSA