Synonyms
Definition
Female choice for men with high SDO describes preferences for men who are competitive, formidable, anti-egalitarian, and prefer short-term mating.
Introduction
In mate choice, females often face a trade-off in choosing the best possible mate where genetic quality and parental investment are prioritized. Males who exhibit good genes may also be men who are socially dominant and competitive, and therefore, more likely to be interested in short-term sexual encounters. Females seeking dominant males may be attempting to secure the benefits bestowed by them, such as access to material resources, protection from threats, and producing strong and healthy children (Kruger and Fitzgerald 2011). However, preferences for dominant males may be modulated by factors associated with fertility, relationship context, and masculinity. Recent research has found evidence on the link between social dominance orientation and political conservatism, thus, it is worth mentioning...
References
Braun, M. F., & Bryan, A. (2006). Female waist to hip and male waist to shoulder ratios as determinants of romantic partner desirability. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 23(5), 805–819.
Buunk, B. P., & Dijkstra, P. (2005). A narrow waist versus broad shoulders: Sex and age differences in the jealousy-evoking characteristics of a rival’s body build. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 379–389.
Durkee, P. K., Goetz, A. T., & Lukaszewski, A. W. (2017). Formidability assessment mechanisms: Examining their speed and automaticity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 39(2), 1–9.
Garza, R., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2019). Fertility status in visual processing of men’s attractiveness. Evolutionary Psychological Science.
Hughes, S. M., & Gallup, G. G., Jr. (2002). Sex differences in morphological predictors of sexual behavior: Shoulder to hip and waist to hip ratios. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 173–178.
Jones, B. C., Hahn, A. C., & DeBruine, L. M. (2019). Ovulation, sex hormones, and women’ s mating psychology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 23(1), 51–62.
Kruger, D. J., & Fitzgerald, C. (2011). Reproductive strategies and relationship preferences associated with prestigious and dominant men. Personality and Individual Differences, 50, 365–369.
Lukaszewski, A. W., & Roney, J. R. (2009). Estimated hormones predict women’s mate preferences for dominant personality traits. Personality and Individual Differences, 47, 191–196.
Petersen, M. B., & Laustsen, L. (2018). Upper-body strength and political egalitarianism: Twelve conceptual replications. Political Psychology, 0(0), 1–20.
Peterson, R. D., & Palmer, C. L. (2017). Effects of physical attractiveness on political beliefs. Politics and the Life Sciences, 36(2), 3–16.
Price, M. E., Sheehy-Skeffington, J., Sidnaius, J., & Pound, N. (2017). Is sociopolitical egalitarinsim related to bodily and facial formidability in men? Evolution and Human Behavior, 38, 626–634.
Sell, A., Sznycer, D., Cosmides, L, Tooby, J., Krauss, A., Nisu, S., … Petersen, M. B. (2017). Physically strong men are more militant: A test across four countries. Evolution and Behavior, 38, 334–340.
Sinn, J. S., & Hayes, M. W. (2018). Is political conservatism adaptive? Reinterpreting right-wing authoritarianism and social dominance orientation as evolved, sociofunctional strategies. Political Ideologies, 39(5), 1123–1139.
Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2005). Male physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: A cross cultural study. Body Image, 2, 383–393.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Garza, R. (2019). Female Choice for Men High in SDO. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2604-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2604-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences