Skip to main content

Evolutionary Paradox: Women Choosing Not to Have Children

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science
  • 46 Accesses

Synonyms

Childless women; Evolutionary contradiction; Reproductive fitness

Definition

The catalyst for evolution is the propagation of one’s genes. In modern times, women are choosing to have less or no offspring, which is seemingly an evolutionary paradox.

Introduction

Females are the choosier sex in almost every species. In modern times, the argument could be made that as a result of more women obtaining college degrees and high-paying jobs, less high mate value males exist (Buss 2016). As a result, human females are having to choose whether to copulate with lower mate value men or whether to take themselves out of the mating game entirely. With mortality rates at an all-time low and economic stress at high, parents may also be choosing to invest more resources in fewer offspring. Additionally, with the advent of modern birth control, women can have sex without the consequence of pregnancy. While the drive for sex still exists, the consequences are more variable, giving women a...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bongaarts, J. (1978). A framework for analyzing the proximate determinants of fertility. Population and development review, 105–132.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12, 1–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2016). Evolution of desire, the. New York: Springer International Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell, J. C. (1976). Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2(3/4), 321–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgar, M. (2015). Maternal instinct and biology: Evolution ensures we want sex, not babies. [Academic News Outlet]. Retrieved from http://theconversation.com/maternal-instinct-and-biology-evolution-ensures-we-want-sex-not-babies-46622

  • Gray, P. B., & Anderson, K. G. (2010). Fatherhood: Evolution and human paternal behavior. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. M., & Hill, M. A. (1990). Gender differences in child care and work: An interdisciplinary perspective. Journal of Behavioral Economics, 19(1), 81–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill, E. M., & Low, B. S. (1992). Contemporary abortion patterns: A life history approach. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13(1), 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hinde, R. A. (1971). Development of social behavior. In Behavior of nonhuman primates (Vol. 3, pp. 1–68). New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan, H. (1996). A theory of fertility and parental investment in traditional and modern human societies. American Journal of Physical Anthropology: The Official Publication of the American Association of Physical Anthropologists, 101(S23), 91–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Langhorne, M. C., & Secord, P. F. (1955). Variations in marital needs with age, sex, marital status, and regional composition. Journal of Social Psychology, 41, 19–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, B. S. (2015). Why sex matters: A Darwinian look at human behavior-revised edition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, E. A., Borgerhoff Mulder, M., Bowles, S., Gurven, M., Hertz, T., & Shenk, M. K. (2010). Production systems, inheritance, and inequality in premodern societies: Conclusions. Current Anthropology, 51(1), 85–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In B. Campbell (Ed.), Sexual selection and the descent of man (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amanda DeSantis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

DeSantis, A. (2020). Evolutionary Paradox: Women Choosing Not to Have Children. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2330-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2330-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics