Skip to main content

Biological Function

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Synonyms

Adaptation; Biofunction; Causal role; Fitness effect; Purpose; Selected effect

Definition

In biology, functions are attributed to the traits, behaviors, and parts of living things. A thing’s function can refer to its purpose, a benefit it confers on an organism, or the causal role it contributes to a more complex system capacity.

Introduction

Biologists attribute functions to a diversity of natural phenomena, from chemical and cellular processes to the organs, traits, and behavior of organisms. It is common for them to say, for example, that the koala’s pouch has the function of protecting its young, that the function of the bee dance is to direct other bees to pollen, or that chlorophyll in plants functions to absorb light and convert it into energy. Yet the term “function” is ambiguous, carrying importantly different meanings and occupying distinct explanatory projects in the biological sciences. This entry will introduce two characteristic features of biological functions,...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Amundson, R., & Lauder, G. V. (1994). Function without purpose. Biology and Philosophy, 9(4), 443–469.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bigelow, J., & Pargetter, R. (1987). Functions. The Journal of Philosophy, 84(4), 181–196.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummins, R. (1975). Functional analysis. The Journal of Philosophy, 72(20), 741–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davies, P. S. (2003). Norms of nature: Naturalism and the nature of functions. London: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garson, J. (2016). A critical overview of biological functions. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (1993). Functions: Consensus without Unity. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 74(3), 196–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godfrey-Smith, P. (2001). Three kinds of Adaptationism. In S. Orzack & E. Sober (Eds.), Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, P. E. (1993). Functional analysis and proper functions. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 44(3), 409–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardcastle, V. G. (2002). On the normativity of functions. In A. Ariew (Ed.), Functions: New essays in the philosophy of psychology and biology (pp. 144–156). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Millikan, R. G. (1984). Language, thought, and other biological categories: New foundations for realism. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neander, K. (1991). The teleological notion of ‘function’. Australasian Journal of Philosophy, 69(4), 454–468.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Caitrin Donovan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Donovan, C. (2019). Biological Function. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2097-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_2097-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics