Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Physical Attractiveness

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1879-1
  • 76 Downloads

Synonyms

Definition

The visual cues used to judge mate quality.

Introduction

One of the most fundamental problems facing an individual is mate selection: how do we choose a partner? It is important that we are sensitive to the physical cues that honestly signal that one individual is more desirable (i.e., fitter and with a better reproductive potential) than another and use them to choose the partner which is most likely to enhance our chances of successful reproduction. The wrong choice will obviously have a negative impact on an individual’s potential for reproduction, so one might expect very strong selective pressures for the development of mechanisms that accurately detect cues to health and fertility in potential partners. In this context, attractiveness is based on features that accurately index health and reproductive potential.

Female Attractiveness

For female attractiveness, the two indices most widely researched are overall body fat...

Keywords

Fluctuate Asymmetry Physical Attractiveness Mate Selection Attractiveness Rating Male Attractiveness 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadeau, J., & Lindberg, T. (1992). Was the Duchess of Windsor right – A cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethology and Sociobiology, 13, 197–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bateson, M., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovee, M. J. (2007). Methodological issues in studies of female attractiveness. In V. Swami, A. Furnham (Eds.), The body beautiful (pp. 46–62). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Boothroyd, L. G., Tovée, M. J., & Pollet, T. V. (2012). Visual diet versus associative learning as mechanisms of change in body size preferences. PLoS One, 7, e48691.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Boothroyd, L.G., Jucker, J.L., Thornborrow, T., Jamieson, M., Burt, D.M., Barton, R., Evans, E.H. & Tovée, M.J. (2016, in press). Television exposure predicts body size preferences in rural Nicaragua. British Journal of Psychology, 107, 752–767.Google Scholar
  5. Brown, W. M., Price, M. E., Kang, J. S., Pound, N., Zhao, Y., & Yu, H. (2008). Fluctuating asymmetry and preferences for sex-typical bodily characteristics. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science USA, 105, 12938–12943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buss, D. M. (2004). Evolutionary psychology: The new science of the mind (2nd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  7. Cafri, G., Thompson, J. K., Ricciardelli, L., McCabe, M., Smolak, L., & Yesalis, C. (2005). Pursuit of the muscular ideal: Physical and psychological consequences and putative risk factors. Clinical Psychology Review, 25, 215–239.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Clarys, J. P., Provyn, S., & Marfell-Jones, M. J. (2005). Cadaver studies and their impact on the understanding of human adiposity. Ergonomics, 48, 1445–1461.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Cornelissen, P. L., Toveé, M. J., & Bateson, M. (2009). Patterns of subcutaneous fat deposition and the relationship between body mass index and waist-to-hip ratio: Implications for models of physical attractiveness. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 256, 343–350.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Cornelissen, K. K., Cornelissen, P. L., Hancock, P. J. B., & Tovée, M. J. (2016). Fixation patterns, not clinical diagnosis, predict body size over-estimation in eating disordered women and healthy controls. International Journal of Eating Disorders, 49, 507–518.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Crossley, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (2012). What is an attractive body? Using an interactive 3D program to create the ideal body for you and your partner. PloS ONE, 7(11), e50601.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Ember, C. R., Ember, M., Korotayev, A., & de Munck, V. (2005). Valuing thinness or fatness in women: Reevaluating the effect of resource scarcity. Evolution and Human Behavior, 2, 257–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Emerging Risk Factor Collaboration. (2011). Separate and combined associations of body-mass index and abdominal adiposity with cardiovascular disease: Collaborative analysis of 58 prospective studies. Lancet, 9771, 1085–1095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fink, B., Neave, N., Brewer, G., & Pawlowski, B. (2007). Variable preferences for sexual dimorphism in stature (SDS): Further evidence for an adjustment in relation to own height. Personality & Individual Differences, 43, 2249–2257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Frederick, D. A., Fessler, D. M. T., & Haselton, M. G. (2005). Do representations of male muscularity differ in men’s and women’s magazines? Body image, 2, 81–86.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Frederick, D. A., Hadji-Michael, M., Furnham, A., & Swami, V. (2010). The influence of leg-to-body ratio (LBR) on judgments of female physical attractiveness: Assessments of computer-generated images varying in LBR. Body image, 7, 51–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Furnham, A., Tan, T., & McManus, C. (1997). Waist-to-hip ratio and preferences for body shape: A replication and extension. Personality & Individual Differences, 22, 539–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. George, H. R., Cornelissen, P. L., Hancock, P. J., Kiviniemi, V. V., & Tovée, M. J. (2012). Differences in eye-movement patterns between anorexic and control observers when judging body size and attractiveness. British Journal of Psychology, 102, 340–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gunnell, D., Whitley, E., Upton, M. N., McConnachie, A., Smith, G. D., & Watt, G. C. M. (2003). Associations of height, leg length, and lung function with cardiovascular risk factors in the Midspan family study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57, 141–146.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Gunnell, D., Oliver, S.E., Donovan, J.L., Peters, T.J., Gillatt, D., Persad, R., Hamdy, F.C., Neal, D.E. & Holly, J.M.P. (2004). Do height-related variations in insulin-like growth factors underlie the associations of stature with adult chronic disease? Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, 89, 213–218.Google Scholar
  21. Health Survey for England. (2003). National Centre for Social Research and University College London. Department of Epidemiology and Public Health. UK Data Archive, Colchester, Essex.Google Scholar
  22. Henss, R. (1995). Waist-to-hip ratio and attractiveness: A replication and extension. Personality & Individual Differences, 19, 479–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Henss, R. (2000). Waist-to-hip ratio & female attractiveness evidence from photographic stimuli and methodological considerations. Personality & Individual Differences, 28, 501–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Koning, L., Merchant, A. T., Pogue, J., & Anand, S. S. (2007). Waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio as predictors of cardiovascular events: meta-regression analysis of prospective studies. European Heart Journal, 28, 850–856.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Kurzban, R., & Weeden, J. (2005). Hurry Date: Mate preferences in action. Evolution and Human Behavior, 26, 227–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lawlor, D. A., Ebrahim, S., & Davey Smith, G. (2002). The association between components of adult height and Type II diabetes and insulin resistance: British Women’s Heart and Health Study. Diabetologia, 45, 1097–1106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Lean, M. E. J., Han, T. S., & Morrison, C. E. (1995). Waist circumference as a measure for indicating need for weight management. British Medical Journal, 311, 158–161.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Maisey, D. S., Vale, E. L. E., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (1999). Characteristics of male attractiveness for women. Lancet, 353, 1500–1500.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Prospective Studies Collaboration. (2009). Body-mass index and cause-specific mortality in 900,000 adults: collaborative analyses of 57 prospective studies. Lancet, 373, 1083–1096.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Rozmus-Wrzesinska, M., & Pawlowski, B. (2005). Men’s ratings of female attractive- ness are influenced more by changes in female waist size compared with changes in hip size. Biological Psychology, 68, 299–308.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Salska, I., Frederick, D. A., Pawlowski, B., Reilly, A. H., Laird, K. T., & Rudd, N. A. (2008). Conditional mate preferences: factors influencing preferences for height. Personality & Individual Differences, 44, 203–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sear, R., & Marlowe, F. W. (2009). How universal are human mate choices? Size does not matter when Hadza foragers are choosing a mate. Biology Letters, 5, 606–609.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  33. Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., et al. (2008). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society, B, 276, 575–584.Google Scholar
  34. Singh, D. (1993). Adaptive significance of female physical attractiveness: Role of wait-to-hip ratio. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 293–307.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Singh, D., & Randall, P. K. (2007). Beauty is in the eye of the plastic surgeon: waist-hip ratio (WHR) and women’s attractiveness. Personality & Individual Differences, 43, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Smith, K. L., Cornelissen, P. L., & Tovée, M. J. (2007a). Color 3D bodies and judgements of human female attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior, 28, 48–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Smith, K. L., Tovée, M. J., Hancock, P. J. B., Bateson, M., Cox, M. A. A., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2007b). An analysis of body shape attractiveness based on image statistics: Evidence for a dissociation between expressions of preference and shape discrimination. Visual Cognition, 15, 927–953.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Streeter, S. A., & McBurney, D. H. (2003). Waist-hip ratio and attractiveness. New evidence and a critique of “a critical test”. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24, 88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Stulp, G., Pollet, T. V., Verhulst, S., & Buunk, A. P. (2012). Curvilinear effect of height on reproductive success in human males. Behavioural Ecology & Sociobiology, 66, 375–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Stulp, G., Buunk, A. P., Pollet, T. V., Nettle, D., & Verhulst, S. (2013). Are human mating preferences with respect to height reflected in actual pairings? PLoS ONE, 8, e54186.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Swami, V., & Tovee, M. J. (2006). Does hunger influence judgments of female physical attractiveness? British Journal of Psychology, 97, 353–363.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Swami, V., & Tovée, M. J. (2007). The relative contribution of profile body shape and weight to judgements of women’s physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia. Body Image, 4, 391–396.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Swami, V., Antonakopoulos, N., Tovée, M. J., & Furnham, A. (2006a). A critical test of the waist-to-hip ratio hypothesis of women’s physical attractiveness in Britain and Greece. Sex Roles, 54, 201–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Swami, V., Einon, D., & Furnham, A. (2006b). The leg-to-body ratio as a human aesthetic criterion. Body image, 3, 317–323.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Swami, V., Knight, D., Tovée, M. J., Davies, P., & Furnham, A. (2007). Preferences for female body size in Britain and the South Pacific. Body Image, 2007(4), 219–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Symons, D. (1980). The evolution of human-sexuality. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 3, 171–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tovée, M. J., Maisey, D. S., Emery, J. L., & Cornelissen, P. L. (1999). Visual cues to female physical attractiveness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 266, 211–218.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  48. Tovée, M. J., Tasker, K., & Benson, P. J. (2000). Is symmetry a visual cue to attractiveness in the human female body? Evolution and Human Behavior, 21(3), 191–200.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Tovée, M. J., Hancock, P. J. B., Mahmoodi, S., Singleton, B. R. R., & Cornelissen, P. L. (2002). Human female attractiveness: waveform analysis of body shape. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 269, 2205–2213.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Tovée, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A., & Mangalparsad, R. (2006). Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27, 443–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Wang, Y. F., Rimm, E. B., Stampfer, M. J., Willett, W. C., & Hu, F. B. (2005). Comparison of abdominal adiposity and overall obesity in predicting risk of type 2 diabetes among men. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 81, 555–563.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Zaadstra, B. M., Seidell, J. C., Noord, P. A. H. V., Velde, E. R. T., Habbema, J. D. F., Vrieskwijk, B., & Karbaat, J. (1993). Fat and female fecundity: Prospective study of effect of body fat distribution on conception rates. British Medical Journal, 306, 484–487.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhu, S., Wang, Z., Heshka, S., et al. (2002). Waist circumference and obesity-associated risk factors among whites in the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: clinical action thresholds. American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 76, 743–749.PubMedGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of PsychologyLincoln UniversityLincolnUK
  2. 2.Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life SciencesNorthumbria UniversityNewcastle upon TyneUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Gary L Brase
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Psychological SciencesKansas State UniversityManhattanUSA