Skip to main content

Sexual Strategies Theory

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Synonyms

Intersexual relations; Mating strategies

Definition

Sexual strategies theory (SST) is a middle-level evolutionary theory of mating strategies that both males and females adopt under different circumstances. It differs from previous theories in that it includes multiple motives each individual can have, such as short-term versus long-term mating, as well as when and why different motives would be predominant.

Introduction

Sexual strategies theory (SST) posits that humans have evolved a complex menu of mating strategies, that some of these mating adaptations are tethered to the temporal dimension of mating, and that although some mating adaptations are similar in women and men, some differ profoundly between the sexes (Buss and Schmitt 1993). Before describing the major premises, predictions, and empirical tests of SST, it is useful to briefly describe theories of mating prior to its articulation.

Previous theories typically posited singular mating motives, such as a quest for...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(01), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M. (2000). The dangerous passion. New York: The Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. (2016). The evolution of desire: Strategies of human mating. New York: Basic Books.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204–232.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., & Shackelford, T. K. (2008). Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment. Evolutionary Psychology, 6, 134–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buss, D. M., Goetz, C., Duntley, J. D., Asao, K., & Conroy-Beam, D. (2017). The mate switching hypothesis. Personality and Individual Differences, 104, 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daly, M., Wilson, M., & Weghorst, S. J. (1982). Male sexual jealousy. Ethology and Sociobiology, 3, 11–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gangestad, S. W., & Buss, D. M. (1993). Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethology and Sociobiology, 14, 89–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gildersleeve, K., Haselton, M. G., & Fales, M. R. (2014). Do women’s mate preferences change across the ovulatory cycle? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1205–1259.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goetz, C. D., Easton, J. A., Lewis, D. M., & Buss, D. M. (2012). Sexual exploitability: Observable cues and their link to sexual attraction. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 417–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haselton, M. G., & Buss, D. M. (2001). Emotional reactions following first-time sexual intercourse: The affective shift hypothesis. Personal Relationships, 8, 357–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonason, P. K., Li, N. P., Webster, G. D., & Schmitt, D. P. (2009). The Dark Triad: Facilitating short-term mating in men. European Journal of Personality, 23, 5–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenrick, D. T., & Keefe, R. C. (1992). Age preferences in mates reflect sex differences in human reproductive strategies. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 15, 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, G. (2000). The mating mind: How sexual choice shaped the evolution of human nature. New York: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scelza, B. A. (2011). Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population. Biology Letters, 7(6), 889–891.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2003). Universal sex differences in the desire for sexual variety: Tests from 52 nations, 6 continents, and 13 islands. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schmitt, D. P. (2016). Fundamentals of human mating strategies. In D. M. Buss (Ed.), The evolutionary psychology handbook (2nd ed., pp. 294–316). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Symons, D. (1979). The evolution of human sexuality. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trivers, R. (1972). Parental investment and sexual selection. In Sexual selection & the descent of man, 1871–1971 (pp. 136–179). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David M. Buss .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Buss, D.M., Schmitt, D.P. (2016). Sexual Strategies Theory. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1861-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1861-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics