Skip to main content

Recalibration Theory of Anger

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Definition

The recalibrational theory of anger explains how natural selection designed anger to bargain for better treatment and how this can explain the major features of anger.

Introduction

The claim that anger has evolved via natural selection is not hotly contested. After all, anger bares many of the hallmark features of an evolved adaptation: it is a complex system instantiated in localized neural tissue (Potegal and Spielberger 2010), it shows early ontogenetic development (components of the adaptation are visible at 7 months, Stenberg et al. 1983), and it demonstrates many cross-cultural universals in basic design (Alonso-Arbiol et al. 2011; Ekman 1973; Wallbot and Scherer 1986). Furthermore, some features of anger are known to develop without exposure to the information that would be required to learn them through more general purpose systems, e.g., congenitally blind children produce normal anger facial expressions (Galati et al. 2003). And so modern researchers generally...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Alonso-Arbiol, I., van de Vijver, F. J., Fernandez, I., Paez, D., Campos, M., & Carrera, P. (2011). Implicit theories about interrelations of anger components in 25 countries. Emotion, 11(1), 1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Averill, J. (1982). Anger and aggression: An essay on emotion. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bushman, B. J., Baumeister, R. F., Thomaes, S., Ryu, E., Begeer, S., & West, S. G. (2009). Looking again, and harder, for a link between low self-esteem and aggression. Journal of Personality, 77(2), 427–446.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1979). Twelve misunderstandings of kin selection. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie, 51(2), 184–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1973). Cross-cultural studies of facial expression. In P. Ekman (Ed.), Darwin and facial expression: A century of research in review (pp. 169–222). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Enquist, M., Leimar, O., Ljungberg, T., Mallner, Y., & Segerdahl, N. (1990). A test of the sequential assessment game: Fighting in the cichlid fish Nannacara anomala. Animal Behaviour, 40, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galati, D., Sini, B., Schmidt, S., & Tinti, C. (2003). Spontaneous facial expressions in congenitally blind and sighted children aged 8-11. Journal of Visual Impairment & Blindness, 97(7), 418–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammerstein, P., & Parker, G. A. (1982). The asymmetric war of attrition. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 96, 647–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen, A. J. (1986). Fighting behavior in bald eagles: A test of game theory. Ecology, 67, 787.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huntingford, F. A., & Turner, A. K. (1987). Animal conflict. New York: Chapman & Hall.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Luckenbill, D. F. (1977). Criminal homicide as a situated transaction. Social Problems, 25(2), 176–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lukaszewski, A. W. (2013). Testing an adaptationist theory of trait covariation: Relative bargaining power as a common calibrator of an interpersonal syndrome. European Journal of Personality, 27, 319–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maynard Smith, J., & Price, G. R. (1973). The logic of animal conflict. Nature, 246, 15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowak, M. A. (2006). Five rules for the evolution of cooperation. Science, 314(5805), 1560–1563.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Potegal, G. S. M., & Spielberger, C. (Eds.). (2010). International handbook of anger. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, G. A., Pham, M. N., & Goetz, A. T. (2014). The implicit rules of combat. Human Nature, 25(4), 496–516.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salas-Wright, C. P., & Vaughn, M. G. (2016). Size matters are physically large people more likely to be violent? Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(7), 1274–1292.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A. (2011). The recalibrational theory and violent anger. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 16, 381–389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A. (2014). Twelve triggers of anger and how they invalidate all major theories of anger and aggression. Presentation at the International Society for Research on Aggression, Georgia State University, 19 July.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Sznycer, D., von Rueden, C., & Gurven, M. (2009a). Human adaptations for the visual assessment of strength and fighting ability from the body and face. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 276(1656), 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (2009b). Formidability and the logic of human anger. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106(35), 15073–15078.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (2014). The human anger face evolved to enhance cues of strength. Evolution and Human Behavior, 35(5), 425–429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Eisner, M., & Ribeaud, D. (2016). Bargaining power and adolescent aggression: The role of fighting ability, coalitional strength, and mate value. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(2), 105–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell, A., Cosmides, L., Tooby, J., Lim, J., Krauss, A., Feldman, A., Rascanu, R., Al-Shawaf, L., Sznycer, D., & Sugiyama L. (in press). The grammar of anger: Mapping the computational architecture of a recalibrational emotion.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenberg, C. R., Campos, J. J., & Emde, R. N. (1983). The facial expression of anger in seven-month-old infants. Child Development, 54(1), 178–184.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1990). The past explains the present: Emotional adaptations and the structure of ancestral environments. Ethology and Sociobiology, 11(4), 375–424.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., & Cosmides, L. (1996). Friendship and the banker’s paradox: Other pathways to the evolution of adaptations for altruism. Proceedings of the British Academy, 88, 119–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tooby, J., Cosmides, L., Sell, A., Lieberman, D., & Sznycer, D. (2008). Internal regulatory variables and the design of human motivation: A computational and evolutionary approach. In A. J. Elliot (Ed.), Handbook of approach and avoidance motivation (pp. 251–271). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallbot, H., & Scherer, K. (1986). The antecedents of emotional experiences. In K. Scherer, H. Wallbott, & A. Summerfield (Eds.), Experiencing emotion: A cross-cultural study (pp. 69–83). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, K. D., Shore, W. J., & Grahe, J. E. (1998). The silent treatment: Perceptions of its behaviors and associated feelings. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 1(2), 117–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aaron Sell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this entry

Cite this entry

Sell, A. (2017). Recalibration Theory of Anger. In: Shackelford, T., Weekes-Shackelford, V. (eds) Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1687-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_1687-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16999-6

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Behavioral Science and PsychologyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Business, Economics and Social Sciences

Publish with us

Policies and ethics