Encyclopedia of Evolutionary Psychological Science

Living Edition
| Editors: Todd K. Shackelford, Viviana A. Weekes-Shackelford

Male Dominance Hierarchies

  • Romain LigneulEmail author
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16999-6_165-1

Dominance relationships refer to asymmetries of control within dyads of individuals. Whether this control is exerted over nutritional resources, space, or sexual partners does not fundamentally matter, as long as framing social interactions in terms of dominance enables the observer to better predict the outcome of these interactions (Bernstein 1981). For example, the concept of dominance can be invoked when predicting that if A has won over B in the past, then A will also win over B in the future or that if A prevails over B when competing for food, then A will also prevail over B when competing for space or sexual partners.

By contrast, dominance hierarchiesrefer to the transitive manifestation of the aforementioned asymmetries within a social group, such that if one has observed that A dominates B and B dominates C, then one can deduce that A will dominate C. This transitivity criterion plays a key normative role in determining which behavioral metrics are suitable for the...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Adler, N. E., Boyce, T., Chesney, M. A., et al. (1994). Socioeconomic status and health. The challenge of the gradient. The American Psychologist, 49, 15–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bernstein, I. S. (1981). Dominance: The baby and the bathwater. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4, 419–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burmeister, S. S., Jarvis, E. D., & Fernald, R. D. (2005). Rapid behavioral and genomic responses to social opportunity. PLoS Biology, 3, e363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duke, A. A., Bègue, L., Bell, R., & Eisenlohr-Moul, T. (2013). Revisiting the serotonin-aggression relation in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 1148–1172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Edwards, D. H., & Kravitz, E. A. (1997). Serotonin, social status and aggression. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 7, 812–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ellis, L., & Lee, E. (1995). Dominance and reproductive success among nonhuman animals: A cross-species comparison. Ethology and Sociobiology, 16, 257–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Greenberg, N., & Crews, D. (1990). Endocrine and behavioral responses to aggression and social dominance in the green anole lizard, Anolis carolinensis. General and Comparative Endocrinology, 77, 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Havlicek, J., Roberts, S. C., & Flegr, J. (2005). Women’s preference for dominant male odour: Effects of menstrual cycle and relationship status. Biology Letters, 1, 256–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Maier, S. F., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2016). Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychological Review, 123, 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Newton-Fisher, N. E., Thompson, M. E., Reynolds, V., et al. (2009). Paternity and social rank in wild chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) from the Budongo Forest, Uganda. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 142, 417–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Pradhan, G. R., van Noordwijk, M. A., & van Schaik, C. (2012). A model for the evolution of developmental arrest in male orangutans. American Journal of Physical Anthropology, 149, 18–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Price, J. (1967). The dominance hierarchy and the evolution of mental illness. Lancet, 290, 243–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Qu, C., Ligneul, R., Van der Henst, J.-B., & Dreher, J.-C. (2017). An integrative interdisciplinary perspective on social dominance hierarchies. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 21, 893–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Roney, J. R., & Simmons, Z. L. (2008). Women’s estradiol predicts preference for facial cues of men’s testosterone. Hormones and Behavior, 53, 14–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rowell, T. E. (1974). The concept of social dominance. Behavioral Biology, 11, 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rutte, C., Taborsky, M., & Brinkhof, M. W. G. (2006). What sets the odds of winning and losing? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 21, 16–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Sapolsky, R. M. (2004). Social status and health in humans and other animals. Annual Review of Anthropology, 33, 393–418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Schjelderup-Ebbe, T. (1921) Gallus domesticus in seinem täglichen Leben. Universitat Greifswald.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Champalimaud Neuroscience ProgramLisbonPortugal

Section editors and affiliations

  • Tara DeLecce
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyOakland UniversityRochesterUSA