Projective Identification in Psychoanalytic Couple and Family Therapy
Name of Concept
Projective Identification in Couple Therapy
Projective identification (PI) offers a powerful lens through which to view chronic marital conflict and unhappiness from a psychoanalytic perspective. Although PI was previously considered solely a feature of serious personality disorders, it is now recognized to be manifest in healthier people, including distressed couples.
PI is a complex concept that originated in the work of Melanie Klein (1946), whose early ideas have been refined as applied to couples by (in chronological order) Dicks (1967), Willi (1984), Wachtel and Wachtel (1986), Scarf (1987), Slipp (1988), Zinner (1989), Catherall (1992), Siegel (1992, 2010), Berkowitz (1999), Middelberg (2001), Donovan (2003), Stern (2006), Lansky (2007), Gurman (2008), and Ringstrom (2014).
PI is a form of interpersonal defensein which people recruit others to help them tolerate their own painful intrapsychic states of mind. This contrasts with purely intrapsychic...
- Bion, W. R. (1962). Learning from experience. London: Tavistock Publications.Google Scholar
- Dicks, H. (1967). Marital tensions. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Donovan, J. M. (2003). Short-term object relations couples therapy. New York: Brunner-Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gurman, A. S. (2008). Integrative couple therapy: A depth psychological approach. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 383–423). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Ogden, T. (1982). Projective identification and therapeutic technique. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
- Ringstrom, P. A. (2014). A relational psychoanalytic approach to couples psychotherapy. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Sandler, J. (1987). The concept of projective identification. In J. Sandler (Ed.), Projection, identification, projective identification (pp. 13–26). Madison: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
- Scarf, M. (1987). Intimate partners: Patterns in love and marriage. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Siegel, J. P. (1992). Repairing intimacy: An object relations approach to couples therapy. New York: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
- Siegel, J. P. (2010). A good-enough therapy: An object relations approach. In A. S. Gurman (Ed.), Clinical handbook of couple therapy (4th ed., pp. 134–152). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Slipp, S. (1988). The technique and practice of object relations family therapy. Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar
- Tansey, M. J., & Burke, W. F. (1989). Understanding countertransference: From projective identification to empathy. Hillsdale: The Analytic Press.Google Scholar
- Wachtel, E. F., & Wachtel, P. L. (1986). Family dynamics in individual psychotherapy: A guide to clinical strategies. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Zinner, J. (1989). The implications of projective identification for marital interaction. In J. Scharff (Ed.), Foundations of object relations family therapy (pp. 155–174). Northvale: Jason Aronson.Google Scholar