Advertisement

Applications in Forensic Biomechanics

  • Andrew S. McIntosh
Reference work entry

Abstract

The use of biomechanics to support the law – coronial, criminal, civil, and other areas – is a developing field, but one that has history in the real world and in the imagination of writers. Biomechanics is both a field of research and professional practice. In one sense, almost any biomechanics research report or project might be relevant to a specific legal question. This chapter provides some case studies and examples of the application of biomechanics in forensics. The chapter also presents some of the challenges for the discipline of biomechanics in its interaction with the legal system.

Keywords

Biomechanics Forensics Accidental injury Intentional injury Assault Pedestrians Helmets Ergonomics 

References

  1. Balko R (2015) The watch – a brief history of forensics. The Washington Post, April 21, 2015Google Scholar
  2. Chadwick EK, Nicol AC, Lane JV, Gray TG (1999) Biomechanics of knife stab attacks. Forensic Sci Int 105:35–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hurt HH, Ouellet JV, Thom DR (1981) Final report motorcycle accident cause factors and identification of countermeasures. Report to US Department of Transportation, DOT-HS-5-01160, Jan 1981Google Scholar
  4. Liu BC, Ivers R, Norton R, et al (2008) Helmets for preventing injury in motorcycle riders. Cochrane Database Syst Rev (1) Art. No.: CD004333.  https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004333.pub3
  5. McIntosh AS, Edkins G (2007) The Waterfall train accident: the critical role of human factors in people and rail system - human factors at the heart of the railway. In: Wilson JR, Norris B, Clarke T, Mills A (eds) Ashgate. ISBN 978-0-07547-7184-8Google Scholar
  6. McIntosh AS, Lai A (2013) Motorcycle helmets: head and neck dynamics in helmeted and unhelmeted oblique impacts. Traffic Inj Prev 14:835–844CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. McIntosh AS, Curtis K, Rankin T et al (2013) Associations between helmet use and brain injuries amongst injured pedal- and motor-cyclists: a case series analysis of trauma centre presentations. Aust Coll Road Saf J 24:11–18Google Scholar
  8. Mills NJ, Gilchrist A (1990) The effectiveness of foams in bicycle and motorcycle helmets. In: Proceedings of the 34th association for the advancement of automotive medicine, ScottsdaleGoogle Scholar
  9. O’Callaghan PT, Jones HD, James DS et al (1999) Dynamics of stab wounds: force required for penetration of various cadaveric human tissues. Forensic Sci Int 104:173–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richter M, Otte D, Lehmann U et al (2001) Head injury mechanisms in helmet-protected motorcyclists: prospective multicenter study. J Trauma 52:949–958CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: a path forward committee on identifying the needs of the forensic sciences community. (2009) National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. ISBN: 0-309-13131-6Google Scholar
  12. Swanwick T (2010) Kaihana Hussain not guilty of all murder charges. Courier Mail February 17, 2010 12:05pmGoogle Scholar
  13. Toor A, Araszewski M (2003) Theoretical vs. empirical solutions for vehicle/pedestrian collisions. SAE technical paper 2003-01-0883Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.McIntosh Consultancy and ResearchSydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Australian Collaboration for Research into Injury in Sport and its Prevention (ACRISP)Federation University AustraliaBallaratAustralia
  3. 3.Monash University Accident Research CentreMonash UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Section editors and affiliations

  • Andrew McIntosh
    • 1
  1. 1.CremorneAustralia

Personalised recommendations