Effects of Total Hip Arthroplasty on Gait

  • Swati Chopra
  • Kenton R. Kaufman
Reference work entry


The hip joint transfers upper body load to the lower limbs and plays an important role in maintaining balance and stability during locomotion. Muscles around the hip joint are also the major postural muscles in our body. A diseased hip joint experiences diminished function affecting the activity of daily living gravely. Furthermore, being a part of the closed kinetic chain, as the disease progresses, problems originating at the hip joint start showing effects on the neighboring joints including the pelvis, knee, ankle, and spine. The gold standard treatment for end-stage hip disease is total hip arthroplasty (THA). From a clinical perspective, total hip replacement is considered to be one of the most successful orthopedic surgeries in terms of patient outcome, based on self-reported questionnaires for health status. However, gait, being the major function of the hip joint, tends not to be assessed objectively in the outcome analysis of THA surgery. In research settings, THA has consistently shown a positive outcome with improved gait parameters compared to preoperative analysis. Note that this recovery is still not reported to be 100% in comparing to healthy controls and, as a result, objective assessment data during the early postoperative period can also be used to help design tailor-made rehabilitation protocols for individual patients, optimizing outcome results. This chapter details gait alteration in hip arthritis and improvement in gait following THA.


Gait Kinematics Kinetics Total hip arthroplasty Electromyography 


  1. Akiyama K, Nakata K, Kitada M, Yamamura M, Ohori T, Owaki H, Fuji T (2016) Changes in axial alignment of the ipsilateral hip and knee after total hip arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 98-B:349–358CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Andriacchi TP, Andersson GB, Fermier RW, Stern D, Galante JO (1980) A study of lower-limb mechanics during stair-climbing. J Bone Joint Surg Am 62:749–757CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barrett WP, Turner SE, Leopold JP (2013) Prospective randomized study of direct anterior vs postero-lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast 28:1634–1638CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beaulieu ML, Lamontagne M, Beaulé PE (2010) Lower limb biomechanics during gait do not return to normal following total hip arthroplasty. Gait Posture 32:269–273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bejjani FJ, Lockett R, Pavlidis L (1992) Videofluoroscopy system for in vivo motion analysis. Google PatentsGoogle Scholar
  6. Ben-Galim P, Ben-Galim T, Rand N, Haim A, Hipp J, Dekel S, Floman Y (2007) Hip-spine syndrome: the effect of total hip replacement surgery on low back pain in severe osteoarthritis of the hip. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:2099–2102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Centers For Disease Control and Prevention (2010) National Hospital Discharge Survey: 2010 table, procedures by selected patient characteristics – number by procedure category and ageGoogle Scholar
  8. Della Croce U, Cappuzzo A, Kerrigan DC (1999) Pelvis and lower limb anatomical landmark calibration precision and its propagation to bone geometry and joint angles. Med Biol Eng Comput 37:155–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Evenson KR, Buchner DM, Morland KB (2012) Objective measurement of physical activity and sedentary behavior among US adults aged 60 years or older. Prev Chronic Dis 9:E26Google Scholar
  10. Fiorentino NM, Kutschke MJ, Atkins PR, Foreman KB, Kapron AL, Anderson AE (2016) Accuracy of functional and predictive methods to calculate the hip joint center in young non-pathologic asymptomatic adults with dual fluoroscopy as a reference standard. Ann Biomed Eng 44:2168–2180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Foucher KC, Wimmer MA (2012) Contralateral hip and knee gait biomechanics are unchanged by total hip replacement for unilateral hip osteoarthritis. Gait Posture 35:61–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hagstromer M, Oja P, Sjostrom M (2007) Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1502–1508CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Harding P, Holland AE, Delany C, Hinman RS (2014) Do activity levels increase after total hip and knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 472:1502–1511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Horstmann T, Listringhaus R, Haase GB, Grau S, Mundermann A (2013) Changes in gait patterns and muscle activity following total hip arthroplasty: a six-month follow-up. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 28:762–769CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lin BA, Thomas P, Spiezia F, Loppini M, Maffulli N (2013) Changes in daily physical activity before and after total hip arthroplasty. A pilot study using accelerometry. Surgeon 11:87–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Louriuro A, Mills PM, Barrett RS (2013) Muscle weakness in hip osteoarthritis: a systematic review. Arthritis Care Res 65:340–352CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lubbeke A, Zimmermann-Sloutskis D, Stern R, Roussos C, Bonvin A, Perneger T, Peter R, Hoffmeyer P (2014) Physical activity before and after primary total hip arthroplasty: a registry-based study. Arthritis Care Res 66:277–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Madsen MS, Ritter MA, Morris HH, Meding JB, Berend ME, Faris PM, Vardaxis VG (2004) The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res 22:44–50CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD (2015) Health at a glance 2015: OECD indicators (summary). OECD Publishing, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Perry J, Burnfield J (2010) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function. J Sports Sci Med 9:353Google Scholar
  21. Queen RM, Butler RJ, Watters TS, Kelley SS, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP (2011) The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on postoperative gait mechanics. J Arthroplast 26:66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Queen RM, Newman ET, Abbey AN, Vail TP, Bolognesi MP (2013) Stair ascending and descending in hip resurfacing and large head total hip arthroplasty patients. J Arthroplast 28:684–689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Queen RM, Appleton JS, Butler RJ, Newman ET, Kelley SS, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP (2014) Total hip arthroplasty surgical approach does not alter postoperative gait mechanics one year after surgery. PM R 6:221–226; quiz 226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Queen RM, Attarian DE, Bolognesi MP, Butler RJ (2015) Bilateral symmetry in lower extremity mechanics during stair ascent and descent following a total hip arthroplasty a one-year longitudinal study. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 30:53–58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Reardon K, Galea M, Dennett X, Choong P, Byrne E (2001) Quadriceps muscle wasting persists 5 months after total hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the hip: a pilot study. Intern Med J 31:7–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Roberts A (2010) Gait analysis: normal and pathological function (2nd edition). Bone Joint J 92-B(8):1184Google Scholar
  27. Shrader W, Bhowmik-Stoker M, Jacofsky MC, Jacofsky DJ (2009) Gait and stair function in total and resurfacing hip arthroplasty: a pilot study. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:1476–1484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tao W, Liu T, Zheng R, Feng H (2012) Gait analysis using wearable sensors. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) 12:2255–2283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Umeda N, Miki H, Nishii T, Yoshikawa H, Sugano N (2009) Progression of osteoarthritis of the knee after unilateral total hip arthroplasty: minimum 10-year follow-up study. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 129:149–154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Van Den Bogert AJ, Read L, Nigg BM (1999) An analysis of hip joint loading during walking, running, and skiing. Med Sci Sports Exerc 31:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Watelain E, Dujardin F, Babier F, Dubois D, Allard P (2001) Pelvic and lower limb compensatory actions of subjects in an early stage of hip osteoarthritis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:1705–1711CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Weber T, Al-Munajjed AA, Verkerke GJ, Dendorfer S, Renkawitz T (2014) Influence of minimally invasive total hip replacement on hip reaction forces and their orientations. J Orthop Res 32:1680–1687CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Wesseling M, Meyer C, Corten K, Simon JP, Desloovere K, Jonkers I (2016) Does surgical approach or prosthesis type affect hip joint loading one year after surgery? Gait Posture 44:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Yoshimoto H, Sato S, Masuda T, Kanno T, Shundo M, Hyakumachi T, Yanagibashi Y (2005) Spinopelvic alignment in patients with osteoarthrosis of the hip: a radiographic comparison to patients with low back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 30:1650–1657CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Motion Analysis LaboratoryMayo ClinicRochesterUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Freeman Miller
    • 1
  • Sebastian I. Wolf
    • 2
  1. 1.duPont Hospital for ChildrenWilmingtonUSA
  2. 2.Movement Analysis LaboratoryClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery; Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury;Heidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations