Advertisement

Gait Disorders in Persons After Stroke

  • Johanna Jonsdottir
  • Maurizio Ferrarin
Reference work entry

Abstract

Muscle weakness and motor control deficits associated with stroke result in fairly typical hemiparetic gait. This chapter will focus on persons with hemiparesis after stroke in the post-acute and chronic stage, their major movement disorders, and how these affect locomotion. Differences in spatiotemporal, kinematic, and kinetic parameters that commonly characterize hemiparetic gait in the subacute and chronic post-stroke periods will be reviewed in reference to characteristics of speed-matched gait of nondisabled persons.

Keywords

Gait Stroke Gait analysis Kinematics Kinetics Coactivation Hemiparetic gait Movement disorders Speed-matched gait Muscles Weakness 

References

  1. Allen JL, Kautz SA, Neptune RR (2011) Step length asymmetry is representative of compensatory mechanisms used in post-stroke hemiparetic walking. Gait Posture 33(4):538–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2011.01.004. Epub 2011 Feb 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Awad LN, Binder-Macleod SA, Pohlig RT, Reisman D (2015) Paretic propulsion and trailing limb angle are key determinants of long-distance walking function after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 29(6):499–508.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968314554625. Epub 2014 Nov 10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Balaban B, Tok F (2014) Gait disturbances in patients with stroke. PM R 6(7):635–642.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2013.12.017. Epub 2014 Jan 19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balasubramanian CK, Bowden MG, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2007) Relationship between step length asymmetry and walking performance in subjects with chronic hemiparesis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 88(1):43–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Beaman CB, Peterson CL, Neptune RR, Kautz SA (2010) Differences in self-selected and fastest-comfortable walking in poststroke hemiparetic persons. Gait Posture 31(3):311–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bayat R, Barbeau H, Lamontagne A (2005) Speed and temporal-distance adaptations during treadmill and overground walking following stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 19(2):115–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, Zajac FE (2005) Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture 22(1):51–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Clark DJ (2015) Automaticity of walking: functional significance, mechanisms, measurement and rehabilitation strategies. Front Hum Neurosci 9:246Google Scholar
  9. Cooper A, Alghamdi GA, Alghamdi MA et al (2012) The relationship of lower limb muscle strength and knee joint hyperextension during the stance phase of gait in hemiparetic stroke patients. Physiother Res Int 17:150–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Den Otter AR, Geurts ACH, Mulder T, Duysens J (2007) Abnormalities in the temporal patterning of lower extremity muscle activity in hemiparetic gait. Gait Posture 25(3):342–352.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gaitpost.2006.04.007CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Garraway M (1985) Stroke rehabilitation units: concepts, evaluation, and unresolved issues. Stroke 16(2):178–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Goldie PA, Matyas TA, Evans OM (2001) Gait after stroke: initial deficit and changes in temporal patterns for each gait phase. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82(8):1057–1065CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Honeine JL, Schieppati M, Gagey O, Do MC (2013) The functional role of the triceps surae muscle during human locomotion. PLoS One 8(1):e52943.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0052943. Epub 2013 Jan 16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Honeine J, Schieppati M, Gagey O, Do M (2014) By counteracting gravity, triceps surae sets both kinematics and kinetics of gait. Phys Rep 2:e00229.  https://doi.org/10.1002/phy2.229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hsiao H, Awad LN, Palmer JA, Higginson JS, Binder-Macleod SA (2016) Contribution of paretic and nonparetic limb peak propulsive forces to changes in walking speed in individuals poststroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 30(8):743–752.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968315624780. Epub 2015 Dec 31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hsu AL, Tang PF, Jan MH (2003) Analysis of impairments influencing gait velocity and asymmetry of hemiplegic patients after mild to moderate stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84(8):1185–1193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Jonsdottir J, Recalcati M, Rabuffetti M, Casiraghi A, Boccardi S, Ferrarin M (2009) Functional resources to increase gait speed in people with stroke: strategies adopted compared to healthy controls. Gait Posture 29(3):355–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kitatani R, Ohata K, Sato S, Watanabe A, Hashiguchi Y, Yamakami N, Sakuma K, Yamada S (2016) Ankle muscle coactivation and its relationship with ankle joint kinematics and kinetics during gait in hemiplegic patients after stroke. Somatosens Mot Res 33(2):79–85. 2016 May 18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lamontagne A, Fung J, McFadyen BJ, Faubert J (2007) Modulation of walking speed by changing optic flow in persons with stroke. J NeuroEng Rehabil 4:22.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-4-22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lamontagne A, Malouin F, Richards CL (2000) Contribution of passive stiffness to ankle plantarflexor moment during gait after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81(3):351–358. PMID:10724082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lord SE, McPherson K, McNaughton HK, Rochester L, Weatherall M (2004) Community ambulation after stroke: how important and obtainable is it and what measures appear predictive? Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lusardi MM, Pellecchia GL, Schulman M (2003) Functional performance in community living older adults. J Geriatr Phys Ther 26(3):14–22Google Scholar
  23. Macko RF, Smith GV, Dobrovolny CL, Sorkin JD, Goldberg AP, Silver KH (2001) Treadmill training improves fitness reserve in chronic stroke patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 82:879–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Martino G, Ivanenko YP, d’Avella A, Serrao M, Ranavolo A, Draicchio F, Cappellini G, Casali C, Lacquaniti F (2015) Neuromuscular adjustments of gait associated with unstable conditions. Neurobiologia 114(5):2867–2882.  https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.00029.2015. Epub 2015 Sep 16Google Scholar
  25. Mulroy S, Gronley J, Weiss W, Newsam C, Perry J (2003) Use of cluster analysis for gait pattern classification of patients in the early and late recovery phases following stroke. Gait Posture 18(1):114–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Nadeau S, Gravel D, Arsenault AB, Bourbonnais D (1999) Plantarflexor weakness as a limiting factor of gait speed in stroke subjects and the compensating role of hip flexors. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 14(2):125–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Neptune RR, McGowan CP (2011) Muscle contributions to whole-body sagittal plane angular momentum during walking. J Biomech 44(1):6–12.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Sep 15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Olney SJ, Griffin MP, McBride ID (1994) Temporal, kinematic, and kinetic variables related to gait speed in subjects with hemiplegia: a regression approach. Phys Ther 74(9):872–885CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Olney SJ, Richards C (1996) Hemiparetic gait following stroke. Part I: characteristics. Gait Posture 4(2):136–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Parvatanemi K, Olney SJ, Brouwer B (2007) Changes in muscle group work associated with changes in gait speed of persons with stroke. Clin Biomech 22:813–820CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Patel AT, Duncan PW, Lai SM, Studenski S (2000) The relation between impairments and functional outcomes poststroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 81(10):1357–1363. PMID:11030501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Patterson KK, Gage WH, Brooks D, Black SE, McIlroy WE (2010) Changes in gait symmetry and velocity after stroke: a cross-sectional study from weeks to years after stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 24(9):783–790CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Perry J, Garrett M, Gronley JK, Mulroy SJ (1995; Jun) Classification of walking handicap in the stroke population. Stroke 26(6):982–989CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Rinaldi LA, Monaco V (2013) Spatio-temporal parameters and intralimb coordination patterns describing hemiparetic locomotion at controlled speed. J NeuroEng Rehabil 10(1):53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Roerdink M1, Beek PJ (2011) Understanding inconsistent step-length asymmetries across hemiplegic stroke patients: impairments and compensatory gait. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 25(3):253–258.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1545968310380687. Epub 2010 Nov 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosa MC, Marques A, Demain S, Metcalf CD (2014) Lower limb co-contraction during walking in subjects with stroke: a systematic review. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 24(1):1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sheean G, McGuire JR (2009) Spastic hypertonia and movement disorders: pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and quantification. PM R 1(9):827–833.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmrj.2009.08.002CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Sheffler LR, Chae J (2015) Hemiparetic Gait. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 26(4):611–623CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Snijders AH, van de Warrenburg BP, Giladi N, Bloem BR (2007) Neurological gait disorders in elderly people: clinical approach and classification. Lancet Neurol 6:63–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Teasell R, Bayona NA, Bitensky J (2005) Plasticity and reorganization of the brain post stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil 12:11–26.  https://doi.org/10.1310/6aum-etyw-q8xv-8xacCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Turnbull GI, Charteris J, Wall JC (1995) A comparison of the range of walking speeds between normal and hemiplegic subjects. Scand J Rehabil Med 27(3):175–182Google Scholar
  42. Wagenaar RC, Beek WJ (1992) Hemiplegic gait: a kinematic analysis using walking speed as a basis. J Biomech 25(9):1007–1015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. WHO (2003) World health report. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  44. Winter DA (1990) Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LaRiCE, Department of NeurorehabilitationIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusMilanItaly
  2. 2.Biomedical Technology DepartmentIRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi OnlusMilanItaly

Section editors and affiliations

  • Freeman Miller
    • 1
  1. 1.duPont Hospital for ChildrenWilmingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations