Advertisement

Somatic Practices: How Motion Analysis and Mind Images Work Hand in Hand in Dance

  • Sarah Whatley
Reference work entry

Abstract

Somatic Practices are body-based movement practices that foreground self-awareness and a first person experience of moving. Increasingly, somatic practices are informing how dance is taught, created, and performed with many dancers turning towards somatics to ensure a healthy and holistic approach to dance. Several somatic practices draw on imagery as a source for moving, for stimulating a more sensorial engagement with movement and to encourage a sense of moving “naturally” and with respect for the “natural environment.” When somatic practices and the imagery that is important for many of these practices are coupled with motion analysis tools, the necessary processing of movement often requires an intervention that can disrupt the “natural” sense of moving somatically. This processing can thus appear to be at odds with a somatic approach to dance. However, there are many examples where motion analysis and mind images do work hand in hand in dance and can generate exciting new insights to the production, teaching, and making of dance. It is this intersection between somatic principles, imagery, and motion analysis tools that is the focus for this essay, which discusses projects that have explored and exploited the intersection between motion analysis, imagery, and somatic practices.

Keywords

Dance Somatic practices Imagery Motion capture WhoLoDance Ruth Gibson Hologram 

References

  1. Batson G, Wilson MA (2014) Body and mind in motion: dance and neuroscience in conversation. Intellect, BristolGoogle Scholar
  2. Camurri A, Lagerlof I, Volpe G (2003) Recognizing emotion from dance movement: comparison of spectator recognition and automated techniques. Int J Hum-Comput Stud 59:213–225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Camurri A, Volpe G, De Poli G, Leman M (2005) Communicating expressiveness and affect in multimodal interactive systems. IEEE Multimedia 12(1):43–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Castellano G, Villalba S D, Camurri A (2007) Recognising human emotions from body movement and gesture dynamics. In: Paiva A, Prada R, Picard R W (eds) 2nd international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, Lisbon, September 2007. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 71–82Google Scholar
  5. Chan JC, Leung H, Tang JK, Komura T (2011) A virtual reality dance training system using motion capture technology. IEEE Trans Learn Technol 4(2):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dewey J (1958) Experience and nature, vol 1. Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  7. Dils A (2002) The ghost in the machine: Merce Cunningham and Bill T. Jones. PAJ: J Perform Art 24(1):92–104Google Scholar
  8. Emslie M (2009) Skinner releasing technique: dancing from within. J Dance Somatic Pract 2(1):169–175MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forsythe W, deLahunta, S (2011) Motion Bank Brochure and Logo Generator. Available via http://motionbank.org/sites/motionbank.org/files/mb_brochure.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2016
  10. Foucault M, Martin LH, Gutman H, Hutton P (1988) Technologies of the self: a seminar with Michel Foucault. University of Massachusetts Press, AmherstGoogle Scholar
  11. Fraleigh S (1996) Dance and the lived body: a descriptive aesthetics. University of Pittsburgh Press, PittsburghCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraleigh S (2015) Moving consciously: somatic transformations through dance, yoga, and touch. University of Illinois Press, UrbanaGoogle Scholar
  13. Franklin E (1996) Dance imagery for technique and performance. Human Kinetics Publishers, ChampaignGoogle Scholar
  14. Hanna T (1980) The body of life: creating new pathways for sensory awareness and fluid movement. Healing Arts Press, RochesterGoogle Scholar
  15. Harbonnier-Topin N, Simard H (2015) Somatic education and introspective verbalisation. In: Whatley S, Garrett Brown N, Alexander K (eds) Attending to movement: somatic perspectives on living in this world. Triarchy, Axminster, pp 239–250Google Scholar
  16. Kapur A, Virji-Babul N, Tzanetakis G, Driessen P F (2005) Gesture-based affective computing on motion capture data. In: Tao J, Tan T, Picard RW (eds) 1st international conference on affective computing and intelligent interaction, Beijing, October 2005. Lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–7Google Scholar
  17. Kozel S (2007) Closer: performance, technologies, phenomenology. MIT Press, Cambridge, MAGoogle Scholar
  18. Manen MV (1990) Researching lived experience: human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. State University of New York Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. May J, Calvo-Merino B, deLahunta S, McGregor W, Cusack R, Owen A, Veldsman M, Ramponi C, Barnard P (2011) Points in mental space: an interdisciplinary study of imagery in movement creation. Dance Res 29(2):402–430Google Scholar
  20. McCarthy R, Blackwell A, Wing A, Hollands K, Barnard P, Nimmo-Smith I, Marcel A (2006) Bodies meet minds: choreography and cognition. Leonardo 39(5):475–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Merleau-Ponty M (2002) [1962] Phenomenology of perception (trans: Smith C). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Neuhaus B (2010) The Kinaesthetic Imagination; an interview with Joan Skinner. In Contact Quarterly Online Journal, July 2010. Available via https://community.contactquarterly.com/journal/view/skinner. Accessed 9 Oct 2013
  23. Polydorou D, Michailidis T, Bullock J (2015) Communication through haptic interaction in digital performance. In: Salazar Sutil N, Popat S (eds) Digital movement: essays in motion technology and performance. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 189–205Google Scholar
  24. Salazar Sutil N (2015) Intelligence behind movement: laboratories of biomechanics and the making of movement utopia. In: Salazar Sutil N, Popat S (eds) Digital movement: essays in motion technology and performance. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 35–54Google Scholar
  25. Schiphorst T (2009) The varieties of user experience: bridging embodied methodologies form somatics and performance to human computer interaction. PhD dissertation, University of PlymouthGoogle Scholar
  26. Schiphorst T, Calvert T (2015) Practising choreography: digital movement as emergent Praxis. In: Salazar Sutil N, Popat S (eds) Digital movement: essays in motion technology and performance. Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, pp 239–259Google Scholar
  27. Sheets-Johnstone M (1966) The phenomenology of dance. Dance Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  28. Shippen J, May B (2010) Calculation of muscle loading and joint contact forces during the rock step in Irish dance. J Dance Med Sci 14(1):11–18Google Scholar
  29. Shippen J, May B, Alexander P, Kolk E (2015) Growing healthier. In: Christer K (ed) Proceedings of the 3rd European conference on Design4Health, Sheffield, 2015Google Scholar
  30. Shusterman R (1999) Somaesthetics: a disciplinary proposal. J Aesthet Art Critic 57(3):299–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Shusterman R (2008) Body consciousness: a philosophy of mindfulness and somaesthetics. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Sweigard LE (1974) Human movement potential: its ideokinetic facilitation. University Press of America, LanhamGoogle Scholar
  33. Todd M E (1968) [1937] The thinking body: a study of the balancing forces of dynamic man. Princeton Book Company, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  34. Vincs K, Barbour K (2014) Snapshots of complexity: using motion capture and principal component analysis to reconceptualise dance. Digit Creat 25(1):62–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Whatley S (2015) Motion capture and the dancer: visuality, temporality and the dancing image. In: Whatley S, Garrett Brown N, Alexander K (eds) Attending to movement: somatic perspectives on living in this world. Triarchy, Axminster, pp 193–204Google Scholar
  36. Williamson A (2010) Reflections and theoretical approaches to the study of spiritualities within the field of somatic movement dance education. J Dance Somatic Pract 2(1):35–61CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Williamson A (2016) Reflections on existential phenomenology, spirituality, dance and movement-based somatics. J Dance Somatic Pract 8(2):273–299Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Centre for Dance ResearchCoventry UniversityCoventryUK

Section editors and affiliations

  • Sebastian I. Wolf
    • 1
  1. 1.Movement Analysis LaboratoryClinic for Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery; Center for Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery and Spinal Cord Injury;Heidelberg University HospitalHeidelbergGermany

Personalised recommendations