Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Geoengineering for Climate Stabilization

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation

Abstract

Engineering the climate by means of carbon dioxide removal (CDR), Earth radiation management (ERM), and/or solar radiation management (SRM) approaches has recaptured the attention of scientists, policy makers, and the public. Climate engineering is being assessed as a set of tools to deliberately, and on a large scale, moderate or retard global warming. There are several concepts available, like injecting aerosol-forming SO2 into the stratosphere or placing huge objects in orbit to partly shade Earth from incoming radiation or fertilizing the ocean with iron for increased algae growth and creation of carbon sinks. Such concepts are highly speculative, and irrespective of whether they would work, they bear huge risks, from adversely affecting the complex climate system on a regional or global scale to potentially triggering droughts, famine, or wars. More research is needed to better understand promising concepts and to work them out in depth, so that options are made available in case they should become necessary in the future, when climate change mitigation and adaptation measures do not suffice and fast action becomes imperative. Apart from the technological hurdles, which are anyhow mostly far beyond today’s engineering capabilities, huge social, moral, and political issues would have to be overcome. The purpose of this chapter is to highlight a few common concepts of CDR, ERM, and SRM for climate engineering to mitigate climate change.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aaltonen H, Pumpanen J, Pihlatie M, Hakola H, Hellén H, Kulmala L, Vesala T, Bäck J (2011) Boreal pine forest floor biogenic volatile organic compound emissions peak in early summer and autumn. Agr Forest Meteorol 151(6):682–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anshelm J, Hansson A (2014) Battling Promethean dreams and Trojan horses: revealing the critical discourses of geoengineering. Energy Res Soc Sci 2:135–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barreras F, Amaveda H, Lozano A (2002) Transient high frequency ultrasonic water atomization. Exp Fluids 33:405–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bellamy R, Chilvers J, Vaughan NE, Lenton TM (2012) Appraising geoengineering. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, working paper 153, June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  • Bewick R, Sanchez JP, McInnes CR (2012) The feasibility of using an L1 positioned dust cloud as a method of space-based geoengineering. Adv Space Res 49(7):1212–1228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bewick R, Lücking C, Colombo C, Sanchez JP, McInnes CR (2013) Heliotropic dust rings for Earth climate engineering. Adv Space Res 51(7):1132–1144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biello D (2009) World’s craziest geoengineering scheme. http://www.scientificamerican.com/podcast/episode/worlds-craziest-geoengineering-sche-09-09-03/

  • Blue Carbon Initiative (2015) http://thebluecarboninitiative.org/

  • Bonn A, Reed MS, Evans CD, Joosten H, Bain C, Farmer J, Emmer I, Couwenberg J, Moxey A, Artz R, Tanneberger F, von Unger M, Smyth M-A, Birnie D (2014) Investing in nature: developing ecosystem service markets for peatland restoration. Ecosyst Serv 9:54–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boston PJ (2008) Gaia hypothesis. In: Reference module in earth systems and environmental sciences, from encyclopedia of ecology. Elsevier Science Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 1727–1731

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler JH, Montzka SA (2013) The NOAA annual greenhouse gas index (AGGI). NOAA/ESRL Global Monitoring Division. http://www.esrl.noaa.gov/gmd/aggi/aggi.html (2015)

  • Burke J (2010) Could a massive dam between Alaska and Russia save the Arctic? Huffington Post. 27 Nov 2010. Retrieved 10 Mar 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrnes SJ, Blanchard R, Capasso F (2014) Harvesting renewable energy from Earth’s mid-infrared emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111(11):3927–3932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CarbFix (2015) https://www.or.is/en/projects/carbfix

  • Chossudovsky M (2007, Dec 7) Weather warfare: beware the US Military’s experiments with climatic warfare. The Ecologist, Global Research. http://www.globalresearch.ca/weather-warfare-beware-the-us-military-s-experiments-with-climatic-warfare/7561

  • Climate Modification Schemes, American Institute of Physics (AIP) (2011) http://www.aip.org/history/climate/RainMake.htm

  • Cole JJ (2013) Chapter 6 – The carbon cycle: with a brief introduction to global biogeochemistry. In: Fundamentals of ecosystem science. pp 109–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Collyns D (2010) Can painting a mountain restore a glacier? BBC. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/10333304

  • Corner A, Parkhill K, Pidgeon N, Vaughan NE (2013) Messing with nature? Exploring public perceptions of geoengineering in the UK. Glob Environ Change 23(5):938–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crutzen PJ (2006) Albedo enhancement by stratospheric sulfur injections: a contribution to resolve a policy dilemma? Clim Change 77:211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de_Richter RK, Ming T, Caillol S (2013) Fighting global warming by photocatalytic reduction of CO2 using giant photocatalytic reactors. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 19:82–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean C (2011) Group urges research into aggressive efforts to fight climate change. http://www.nytimes.com/2011/10/04/science/earth/04climate.html?_r=0

  • Dixon T, Garrett J, Kleverlaan E (2014) GHGT-12, update on the London protocol – developments on transboundary CCS and on geoengineering. Energy Procedia 63:6623–6628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOE/NETL carbon dioxide capture and storage RD&D roadmap, Dec 2010. http://www.netl.doe.gov/File%20Library/Research/Carbon%20Seq/Reference%20Shelf/CCSRoadmap.pdf

  • Early JT (1989) Space-based solar shield to offset greenhouse effect. J Br Interplanet Soc 42:567–569. http://www.see.ed.ac.uk/~shs/Climate%20change/Data%20sources/Early%20earth%20shield1989.pdf

  • Ebersbach F, Assmy P, Martin P, Schulz I, Wolzenburg S, Nöthig E-M (2014) Particle flux characterisation and sedimentation patterns of protist plankton during the iron fertilisation experiment LOHAFEX in the Southern Ocean. Deep Sea Res I Oceanogr Res Pap 89:94–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Field C, Barros V, Stocker TF, Dahe Q, Minx J, Mach K, Plattner G-K, Schlömer S, Hansen G, Mastrandrea M (2012) IPCC expert meeting on geoengineering, meeting report, Lima, 20–22 June 2011, ISBN 978-92-9169-136-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmonds I, Smith G (2011) Surface reflectance and conversion efficiency dependence of technologies for mitigating global warming. Renew Energy 36:1343–1351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans J, Stride E, Edirisinghe M, Andrews D, Simons R (2010) Can oceanic foams limit global warming? Climate Res 42(2):155–160. doi:10.3354/cr00885. edit

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro AJ, Highwood EJ, Charlton-Perez AJ (2014) Weakened tropical circulation and reduced precipitation in response to geoengineering. Environ Res Lett 9:014001 (7 pp)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goes M, Tuana N, Keller K (2010) The economics (or lack thereof) of aerosol geoengineering. In: Climatic change. Springer. doi:10.1007/s10584-010-9961-z, http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/phod/docs/Goes_etal_2011.pdf

  • Goldberg P, Chen Z-Y, O’Connor W, Walters R, Ziock H (1998) CO2 mineral sequestration studies in US. http://www.netl.doe.gov/publications/proceedings/01/carbon_seq/6c1.pdf

  • Goldenberg S (2014) Al Gore says use of geo-engineering to head off climate disaster is insane, theguardian.com, Wednesday 15 Jan 2014. http://www.theguardian.com/world/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2014/jan/15/geo-al-gore-engineering-climate-disaster-instant-solutio

  • Gomes MS de P, de Araújo MSM (2011) Artificial cooling of the atmosphere – a discussion on the environmental effects. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15(1):780–786

    Google Scholar 

  • Herzog H (2002) Carbon sequestration via mineral carbonation: overview and assessment (PDF). Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved 5 Mar 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyward C, Rayner S (2013) A curious asymmetry: social science expertise and geoengineering. Climate geoengineering governance working paper series: 007. http://geoengineering-governance-research.org/perch/resources/workingpaper7heywardrayneracuriousasymmetry.pdf

  • House KZ et al (2011) An economic and energetic analysis of capturing CO2 from ambient air. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108:20428–20433

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hyland C, Sarmah AK (2014) Chapter 25 – Advances and innovations in biochar production and utilization for improving environmental quality. In: Bioenergy research: advances and applications. Elsevier Ltd, Amsterdam, pp 435–446

    Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2015) 2.2.3. Afforestation, reforestation, and deforestation. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/sres/land_use/index.php?idp=47

  • Keith DW, Parson E, Morgan MG (2010) Research on global sun block needed now. Nature (Nat Publ Group) 463(7280):426–427

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy RG III, Roy KI, Fields DE (2013) Dyson dots: changing the solar constant to a variable with photovoltaic lightsails. Acta Astronaut 82(2):225–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kintisch E (2010) Hack the planet: science’s best hope – or worst nightmare – for averting climate catastrophe. Wiley, Hoboken. ISBN 0-470-52426-X

    Google Scholar 

  • Kosugi T (2010) Role of sunshades in space as a climate control option. Acta Astronaut 67(1–2):241–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kravitz B (2013) Geoengineering has its limits. Nature 501:9. doi:10.1038/501009a

    Google Scholar 

  • Kunzig R (2008) Geoengineering: how to cool earth – at a price. Scientific American. http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/geoengineering-how-to-cool-earth/

  • Lenton TM, Vaughan NE (2009) The radiative forcing potential of different climate, geoengineering options. Atmos Chem Phys 9:5539–5561. www.atmos-chem-phys.net/9/5539/2009/

  • Lorenz EN (1963) Deterministic non-periodic flow. J Atoms Sci 20:130–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz EN (1972) Predictability: does the flap of a butterfly’s wings in Brazil set off a tornado in Texas? American Association for the Advancement of Science, 139th meeting, 29 Dec 1972. http://eaps4.mit.edu/research/Lorenz/Butterfly_1972.pdf

  • MacMynowski DG, Keith DW, Caldeira K, Shin HJ (2011) Can we test geoengineering? Energy Environ Sci 4:5044–5052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath M (2014) Geoengineering plan could have ‘unintended’ side effect. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-25639343

  • Ming T, de_Richter R, Liu W, Caillol S (2014) Fighting global warming by climate engineering: is the Earth radiation management and the solar radiation management any option for fighting climate change? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31:792–834

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DL, Finnegan W (2009) Modification of cirrus clouds to reduce global warming. Environ Res Lett 4:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell DL, Mishra S, Lawson RP (2011) Cirrus clouds and climate engineering: new findings on ice nucleation and theoretical basis. In: Planet earth. Intech, Rijeka, pp 257–288

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony T (2013) Decomposition of Ireland’s carbon emissions from 1990 to 2010: an extended Kaya identity. Energy Policy 59:573–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oke TR (1997) Urban climates and global environmental change. In: Thompson RD, Perry A (eds) Applied climatology: principles & practices. Routledge, New York, pp 273–287

    Google Scholar 

  • Pacella RM (2007) Duct tape methods to save the earth: insulate the glaciers. Pop Sci. http://www.popsci.com/node/3245

  • Rasch PJ, Tilmes S, Turco RP, Robock A, Oman L, Chen C, Stenchikov GL, Garcia RR (2008) An overview of geoengineering of climate using stratospheric sulphate aerosols. Philos Transact A Math Phys Eng Sci 366(1882):4007–4037

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rinnan R, Rinnan Å, Faubert P, Tiiva P, Holopainen JK, Michelsen A (2011) Few long-term effects of simulated climate change on volatile organic compound emissions and leaf chemistry of three subarctic dwarf shrubs. Environ Exp Bot 72(3):377–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robock A (2012) Is geoengineering research ethical? Peace Secur 4:226–229

    Google Scholar 

  • Robock A (2014) Stratospheric aerosol geoengineering. Issues Environ Sci Techol (special issue “Geoeng Clim Syst”) 38:162–185

    Google Scholar 

  • Robock A, Marquardt A, Kravitz B, Stenchikov G (2009) Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering. Geophys Res Lett 36, L19703. doi:10.1029/2009GL039209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockström J, Steffen W, Noone K, Persson Å, Chapin FS III, Lambin EF, Lenton TM, Scheffer M, Folke C, Schellnhuber HJ, Nykvist B, de Wit CA, Hughes T, van der Leeuw S, Rodhe H, Sörlin S, Snyder PK, Costanza R, Svedin U, Falkenmark M, Karlberg L, Corell RW, Fabry VJ, Hansen J, Walker B, Liverman D, Richardson K, Crutzen P, Foley JA (2009) A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461:472–475. doi:10.1038/461472a

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rotman D (2013) A cheap and easy plan to stop global warming. http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/511016/a-cheap-and-easy-plan-to-stop-global-warming/

  • Rusco F, Stephenson J (2010) Climate change, a coordinated strategy could focus federal geoengineering research and inform governance efforts, report to the Chairman, Committee on Science and Technology, House of Representatives, GAO-10-903. United States Government Accountability Office (GAO). http://www.gao.gov/assets/320/310105.pdf

  • Schirmer J, Bull L (2014) Assessing the likelihood of widespread landholder adoption of afforestation and reforestation projects. Glob Environ Chang 24:306–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (2012) Geoengineering in relation to the convention to biological diversity: technical and regulatory matters. CBD technical series no 66. Montreal, ISBN 92-9225-429-4. http://www.cbd.int/doc/publications/cbd-ts-66-en.pdf

  • Shepherd J (2009) Geoengineering the climate: science governance and uncertainty. The Royal Society, London. https://royalsociety.org/policy/publications/2009/geoengineering-climate/

  • Shukman D (2014) Geo-engineering: climate fixes ‘could harm billions’. http://www.bbc.com/news/science-environment-30197085. Accessed 5 Jan 2015

  • Sikka T (2012) A critical theory of technology applied to the public discussion of geoengineering. Technol Soc 34(2):109–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SPICE Stratospheric Particle Injection for Climate Engineering (2015) http://www.spice.ac.uk/

  • Stilgoe J, Watson M, Kuo K (2013a) Public engagement with biotechnologies offers lessons for the governance of geoengineering research and beyond. PLoS Biol 11(11). doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001707

    Google Scholar 

  • Stilgoe J, Owen R, Macnaghten P (2013b) Developing a framework for responsible innovation. Res Policy 42:1568–1580

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling A (2014) Transforming power: social science and the politics of energy choices. Energy Res Soc Sci 1:83–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stix TH (1993) Removal of chlorofluorocarbons from the troposphere, Plasma Science. IEEE conference record – abstracts, 1993 I.E. international conference on, ISBN 0-7803-1360-7

    Google Scholar 

  • Strand SE, Benford G (2009) Ocean sequestration of crop residue carbon: recycling fossil fuel carbon back to deep sediments. Environ Sci Technol 43(4):1000–1007. doi:10.1021/es8015556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sweeney JA (2014) Command-and-control: alternative futures of geoengineering in an age of global weirding. Futures 57:1–13

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tate KR (2015) Soil methane oxidation and land-use change – from process to mitigation. Soil Biol Biochem 80:260–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teller E, Hyde R, Wood L (1997) Global warming and ice ages: prospects for physics-based modulation of global change (PDF). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. Retrieved 30 Oct 2018. See pages 10–14 in particular

    Google Scholar 

  • Trabucco A, Zomer RJ, Bossio DA, van Straaten O, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation through afforestation/reforestation: a global analysis of hydrologic impacts with four case studies. Agr Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):81–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Victor DG, Granger Morgan M, Apt J, Steinbruner J, Ricke K (2009) The geoengineering option: a last resort against global warming?. Geoengineering. Council on Foreign Affairs. Retrieved 19 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  • Vidal J (2011) Giant pipe and balloon to pump water into the sky in climate experiment. The Guardian. http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2011/aug/31/pipe-balloon-water-sky-climate-experiment

  • von Neumann J (1955) Can we survive technology? Fortune, June, pp 106–108, 151–152. Reprinted in Sarnoff D (ed) (1956) The fabulous future: America in 1980. Dutton, New York, pp 33–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Weaver IS, Dyke JG (2012) The importance of timescales for the emergence of environmental self-regulation. J Theor Biol 313:172–180

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Willoughby HE, Jorgensen DP, Black RA, Rosenthal SL (1985) Project STORMFURY, a scientific chronicle, 1962–1983. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 66:505–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank and Partners Award $4.8 Million to 26 Innovative Ideas to Save the Planet, http://web.worldbank.org/WBSITE/EXTERNAL/COUNTRIES/AFRICAEXT/EXTAFRSUMESSD/EXTFORINAFR/0,,contentMDK:22389504~menuPK:2493506~pagePK:64020865~piPK:149114~theSitePK:2493451,00.html. Accessed 16 Jan 2015

  • Zeng N (2008) Carbon sequestration via wood burial. Carbon Balance Manage 3:1. doi:10.1186/1750-0680-3-1, http://www.cbmjournal.com/content/3/1/1

  • Zhang Z, Moore JC, Huisingh D, Zhao Y (2015) Review of geoengineering approaches to mitigating climate change. J Clean Prod 15:898–907

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou S, Flynn PC (2005) Geoengineering downwelling ocean currents: a cost assessment. Clim Change 71(1–2):203–220. doi:10.1007/s10584-005-5933-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zomer RJ, Trabucco A, Bossio DA, Verchot LV (2008) Climate change mitigation: a spatial analysis of global land suitability for clean development mechanism afforestation and reforestation. Agr Ecosyst Environ 126(1–2):67–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Advanced Engineering Technologies, University of Applied Sciences FH Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Maximilian Lackner

Authors
  1. Maximilian Lackner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maximilian Lackner .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Departmemt of Chemical Engineering, University of Mississippi, Oxford, Mississippi, USA

    Wei-Yin Chen

  2. National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science & Technology (AIST), Nagoya, Japan

    Toshio Suzuki

  3. Institute of Advanced Engineering Technologies, University of Applied Sciences FH Technikum Wien, Vienna, Austria

    Maximilian Lackner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Lackner, M. (2017). Geoengineering for Climate Stabilization. In: Chen, WY., Suzuki, T., Lackner, M. (eds) Handbook of Climate Change Mitigation and Adaptation. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14409-2_72

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation