Skip to main content

Bioactive Glass Bone Grafts: History and Clinical Applications

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Handbook of Bioceramics and Biocomposites

Abstract

The second generation of biomaterials concept, based upon a unique composition range of calcium, sodium phosphosilicate (CSPS) glasses, and glass-ceramics, involved bonding of the implant material to the bone. It is essential to recognize that no man-made material can respond to changing physiological loads or biochemical stimuli, as do living tissues. This compromise limits the lifetime of all man-made body parts. Recognizing this fundamental limitation also signals that we have reached a limit to current medical practice that emphasizes replacement of tissues. For the twenty-first century, it is critical to emphasize a more biologically based method of repair-regeneration of tissues. Third-generation bioactive materials with controlled release of biochemical stimuli provide the starting point for this shift toward a more biologically based approach to repair of diseased or damaged tissues, e.g., regeneration of tissues. Bioactive glass bone grafts are based upon this concept of in situ regeneration of bone with structure, architecture, and mechanical strength equivalent to normal cortical and cancellous bone. We need to remember that only a little more than 40 years ago, the concept of a material that would not be rejected by living tissues also seemed impossible. This is now a clinical reality that has benefited tens of millions of people and should stimulate new concepts in the years ahead.

Larry L. Hench: deceased

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Hench LL (1991) Bioceramics: from concept to clinic. J Am Ceram Soc 74:1487–1510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hench LL, Wilson J, Greenspan DC (2004) Bioglass: a short history and bibliography. J Aust Ceram Soc 40:1–42

    Google Scholar 

  3. Hench LL, Splinter RJ, Allen WC, Greenlee TK Jr (1971) Bonding mechanisms at the interface of ceramic prosthetic materials. J Biomed Mater Res 2(1):117–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hench LL (1998) Bioceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 81(7):1705–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamamuro T, Hench LL, Wilson J (eds) (1990) CRC handbook of bioactive ceramics, vol 2: Calcium phosphate and hydroxylapatite ceramics, CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida

    Google Scholar 

  6. Klein CPAT, Wolke JGC, deGroot K (1993) Stability of Calcium Phosphate Ceramics and Plasma Sprayed Coating. In: Hench LL, Wilson J (eds) An introduction to bioceramics. World Scientific, London, p 199

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Hench LL, Wilson J (eds) (1996) Clinical performance of skeletal prostheses. Chapman and Hall, London, pp 214–236 and 255–270

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yamamuro T (1996) A/W Glass-Ceramic: Clinical Applications. In: Hench LL, Wilson J (eds) An introduction to bioceramics. World Scientific, London, p 89–105

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wrobelewski BM, Fleming PA, Siney PD (1999) Charnley low-frictional torque arthroplasty of the hip. 20-to-30 year results. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81(3):427–430

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hench LL, Polak JM (2002) Third-generation biomedical materials. Science 295:1014–1017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones JR (2012) Review of bioactive glass: from Hench to hybrids. Acta Biomater. doi:10.1016/j.acbio.2012.08.023

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hench LL, Jones JR, Fenn MB (2012) New materials and technologies for healthcare. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson J, Low SB (1992) Bioactive ceramics for periodontal treatment: comparative studies. J Appl Biomater 3:123–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xynos ID, Hukkanen MVJ, Batten JJ, Buttery ID, Hench LL, Polak JM (2000) Bioglass 45S5 stimulates osteoblast turnover and enhances bone formation In vitro: implications and applications for bone tissue engineering. Calcif Tissue Int 67(4):321–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hench LL, Xynos ID, Buttery LD, Polak JM (2000) Bioactive materials to control cell cycle. J Mater Res Innov 3:313–323

    Google Scholar 

  16. Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery DKL, Hench LL, Polak JM (2000) Ionic products of bioactive glass dissolution increase proliferation of human osteoblasts and induce insulin-like growth factor II mRNA expression and protein synthesis. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 276:461–465

    Google Scholar 

  17. Xynos ID, Edgar AJ, Buttery DKL, Hench LL, Polak JM (2001) Gene-expression profiling of human osteoblasts following treatment with the ionic products of bioglass (R) 45S5 dissolution. J Biomed Mater Res 55:151–157

    Google Scholar 

  18. Bielby RC, Christodoulou IS, Pryce RS, Radford WJP, Hench LL, Polak JM (2004) Time- and concentration-dependent effects of dissolution products of 58S sol-gel bioactive glass on proliferation and differentiation of murine and human osteoblasts. Tissue Eng 10:1018–1026

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Bielby RC, Pryce RS, Hench LL, Polak JM (2005) Enhanced derivation of osteogenic cells from murine embryonic stem cells after treatment with ionic dissolution products of 58s bioactive sol-gel glass. Tissue Eng 11:479–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Christodoulou I, Buttery LDK, Saravanapavan P, Tai GP, Hench LL, Polak JM (2005) Dose- and time-dependent effect of bioactive gel-glass ionic-dissolution products on human fetal osteoblast-specific gene expression. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 74B:529–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Christodoulou I, Buttery LDK, Saravanapavan P, Tai GP, Hench LL, Polak JM (2005) Characterization of human foetal osteoblasts by microarray analysis following stimulation with 58S bioactive gel-glass ionic dissolution products. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 77B:431–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gough JE, Jones JR, Hench LL (2004) Nodule formation and mineralisation of human primary osteoblasts cultured on a porous bioactive glass scaffold. Biomaterials 25:2039–2046

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hench LL (2003) Glass and genes: the 2001 W. E. S. Turner memorial lecture. Glass Technol 44:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  24. Jones JR, Tsigkou O, Coates EE, Stevens MM, Polak JM, Hench LL (2007) Extracellular matrix formation and mineralization of on a phosphate-free porous bioactive glass scaffold using primary human osteoblast (HOB) cells. Biomaterials 28:1653–1663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hench LL (ed) (2013) Introduction to bioceramics, 2nd edn. Imperial College Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ilharreborde B, Morel E, Fitoussi F, Presedo A, Souchet P, Pennecot G, Mazda K (2008) Bioactive glass as a bone substitute for spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a comparative study with iliac crest autograft. J Pediatr Orthop 28:347–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry L. Hench .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hench, L.L. (2016). Bioactive Glass Bone Grafts: History and Clinical Applications. In: Antoniac, I. (eds) Handbook of Bioceramics and Biocomposites. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12460-5_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics