Encyclopedia of Bioastronautics

Living Edition
| Editors: Laurence R. Young, Jeffrey P. Sutton

Sensorimotor Adaptation, Including SMS

  • Rachael D. SeidlerEmail author
  • Ajitkumar P. Mulavara
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10152-1_22-1


Sensorimotor adaptation refers to the capacity of the central nervous system to gradually update motor control to compensate for changes in sensory inputs from the environment or for changes in mechanical characteristics of the body. One example is learning to accommodate to the refraction of light in water when reaching for objects viewed through a diving mask. In the microgravity environment, somatosensory and vestibular inputs are quite different than they are on Earth. The body is unloaded, resulting in greater movement per unit of force. Moreover, on Earth the otoliths of the vestibular system signal angle of orientation of the head relative to a gravitational vector, which is absent in space. There is a resulting reinterpretation of head tilt as a linear acceleration which leads to motor control and perceptual disruptions on return to Earth. It is perhaps not surprising then that crewmembers report a high incidence of space motion sickness due to sensory conflict. In...

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.


  1. Balaban CD (1999) Vestibular autonomic regulation (including motion sickness and the mechanism of vomiting). Curr Opin Neurol 12(1):29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bloomberg JJ, Mulavara AP (2003) Changes in walking strategies after spaceflight. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 22:58–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Clément G, Reschke M, Wood S (2005) Neurovestibular and sensorimotor studies in space and Earth benefits. Curr Pharm Biotechnol 6(4):267–283Google Scholar
  4. Lackner JR, DiZio P (2006) Space motion sickness. Exp Brain Res 175:377–399CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Money KE (1970) Motion sickness. Physiol Rev 50:1–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Oman CM (1988) The role of static visual cues in the etiology of space motion sickness. In: Igarahi M, Nute KG (eds) Proceedings, symposium on vestibular organs and altered force environment, October, 1987. NASA/Space Biomedical Research Institute, USRA, Division of Space Biomedicine, Houston, pp 25–38Google Scholar
  7. Oman CM (1990) Motion sickness: a synthesis and evaluation of the sensory conflict theory. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 68:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Oman CM, Cullen KE (2014) Brainstem processing of vestibular sensory exafference: implications for motion sickness etiology. Exp Brain Res 232(8):2483–2492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ortega HJ Jr, Harm D (2008) Space and entry motion sickness, chapter 10. In: Barratt MR, Pool SL (eds) Principles of clinical medicine for spaceflight. Springer Science+Business Media, New York, pp 211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Paloski WH, Oman CM, Bloomberg JJ, Reschke MF, Wood SJ, Harm DL, Peters BT, Mulavara AP, Locke JP, Stone L (2008) Risk of sensory-motor performance failures affecting vehicle control during space missions: a review of the evidence. J Gravit Physiol 15(2):1–29Google Scholar
  11. Reschke MF, Clément G, Thorson SL, Harm DL, Mader T, Dudley AM, Wood SJ, Bloomberg JJ, Mulavara AP, Gibson CR, Williams D (2015) Chapter 9 neurology; section III: space flight and crew health: adaptation, pathophysiology, rehabilitation, and countermeasures. In: Nicogossian AE, Huntoon CL, Snyder V (eds) Space physiology and medicine, 4th edn. Lea and Febiger, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar
  12. Seidler RD, Benson BL, Boyden NB, Kwak Y (2013) Skill acquisition, chapter 20. In: Oschner K, Kosslyn S (eds) The Oxford handbook of cognitive neuroscience, vol 1. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  13. Seidler RD, Mulavara AP, Bloomberg JJ, Peters BT (2015) Individual predictors of sensorimotor adaptability. Front Syst Neurosci 9:100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Young LR (1984) Perception of the body in space: mechanisms. In: Ddarien-Smith I (ed) Handbook of physiology-the nervous system III. Amerian Physiological Society, Bethesda, pp 1023–1066Google Scholar
  15. Young LR, Oman CM, Watt DGD, Money KE, Lichtenberg BK (1985) Spatial orientation in weightlessness and readaptation to earth’s gravity. Science 225(4658):205–208CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of FloridaGainesvilleUSA
  2. 2.KBRwyleHoustonUSA
  3. 3.NASA Johnson Space CenterHoustonUSA

Section editors and affiliations

  • Peter Norsk
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Center for Space MedicineBaylor College of MedicineHoustonUSA
  2. 2.Biomedical Research & Environmental Sciences DivisionNASA, Johnson Space CenterHoustonUSA