Advertisement

Common Examples of Physico-Chemical Systems Installed Aboard Submarines

  • Dustin L. WallaceEmail author
Living reference work entry

Abstract

Physico-chemical systems installed aboard naval submarine fleets around the world were discussed with a particular emphasis on oxygen and potable water generating systems. These systems are considered of the open loop variety. Oxygen generation, electrical-chemical, and polymer oxygen extraction techniques were likewise surveyed. Air monitoring techniques were classified as either passive or active, with the latter being considered a closed loop system. Potable water generation methods were described, with a particular emphasis on desalination and distilling techniques. Both of these methods are open loop systems. Water purity monitoring methods were briefly described as well.

Keywords

Desalination Distillers Electrical-chemical oxygen generators Momoethanolamine Polymer oxygen generators Physico-chemical systems Open system Closed system 

References

  1. Andrews CC, Murphy OJ (2003) Alternative electrochemical systems for ozonation of water: hydrogen gas, ozone gas, and ozonated water can be delivered under pressure. Phys Sci, July. Retrieved from https://www.techbriefs.com/component/content/article/9-ntb/tech-briefs/physical-sciences/1440?start=1
  2. Armistead P (2010) Re: Tech talk: how Navy provides drinkable water at sea [transcript], October 7. Retrieved from http://science.dodlive.mil/2010/10/07/tech-talk-how-navy-provides-drinkable-water-at-sea-transcript/
  3. Bodner Research Web (2018) The Lewis definitions of acids and bases. Retrieved from Purdue University, Division of Chemistry Education website: http://chemed.chem.purdue.edu/genchem/topicreview/bp/ch11/lewis.php
  4. Defense Industry Daily Staff (2008) Treadwell supplies oxygen generator components for nuclear subs. Defense Industry Daily, January. Retrieved from https://www.defenseindustrydaily.com/treadwell-supplies-oxygen-generator-components-for-nuclear-subs-2-04690/
  5. Department of the Navy (2008) Standard submarine medical procedures manual (COMSUBFOR INSTRUCTION 6000.2C). U.S. Government Printing Office, Norfolk. Retrieved from https://www.cnic.navy.mil/content/dam/cnic/hq/pdfs/Water/COMNAVSUB-6000-2C.pdf
  6. Environmental Protection Agency (1999) Phase 1 final rule and technical development document of uniform national discharge standards (UNDS). (EPA Publication No. EPA-842-R-99-001), p 16. Retrieved from https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/2007_07_10_oceans_regulatory_unds_tdddocuments_appadistillation.pdf
  7. Keller J (2016) UTC to supply low pressure electrolyzes for breathing oxygen aboard submerged submarines. Military and Aerospace, July 13. Retrieved from http://www.militaryaerospace.com/articles/2016/07/submarines-electrolyzers-oxygen.html
  8. Lachish U (2002) Optimizing the efficiency of reverse osmosis seawater desalination, p 1. Retrieved from http://urila.tripod.com/Seawater.htm
  9. Maritime Park Association (2013) Chapter 10. New submarine distilling systems. Submarine Distilling Systems NAVPERS 16170, pp 69–71. Retrieved from https://maritime.org/doc/fleetsub/still/chap10.htm
  10. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (2001) Submarine air treatment, September. pp 3–15. Retrieved from http://web.mit.edu/12.000/www/m2005/a2/8/pdf1.pdf
  11. Mazurek W (2015) Key developments in submarine air monitoring and air purification during the past 20 years, p 31. SAMAP 2015. Retrieved from https://www.sonistics.com/wp-content/uploads/01-KEY-DEVELOPMENTS-4.pdf
  12. McCaney K (2014) Nanotech process a breath of fresh air for submarines. Defense Systems. Retrieved from https://defensesystems.com/articles/2014/11/17/pnnl-navy-samms-submarine-air-purification.aspx
  13. Micropore Inc (2018a) ExtendAir PowerCube. Retrieved from http://www.microporeinc.com/media/docs/ExtendAir_PowerCube.pdf
  14. Micropore Inc (2018b) Micropore ExtendAir CO2 absorbent. Retrieved from http://www.microporeinc.com/submarine
  15. Mudgett PD, Manney JA, Smith MJ, O’Connor SJ, Pilgrim JS (2017) U.S. Navy submarine sea trial of NASA developed multi-gas monitor. In: 47th international conference on environmental systems, p 1. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20170002603.pdf
  16. National Research Council (1996) Shipboard pollution control: U.S. Navy compliance with MARPOL annex v. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, p 41. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/9190/chapter/10
  17. National Research Council (1997) Advanced technology for human support in space. U.S. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC, p 22. Retrieved from https://www.nap.edu/read/5826/chapter/4
  18. Naval ships technical manual (1995) Chapter 533. Potable water systems. U.S. Department of the Navy, Washington, DC, pp 3–2. Retrieved from http://www.med.navy.mil/sites/nmcphc/Documents/nepmu-6/Environmental-Health/SSCP/References/NSTM-533.pdf
  19. No Author (2018a) Infrared carbon dioxide systems. Systech Illinois, p 2. Retrieved from https://www.systechillinois.com/en/support/technologies/infrared-carbon-dioxide-sensors
  20. No Author (2018b) Mass spectrometer and elemental analysis. Georgia State University, p 1. Retrieved from https://chem.pg.edu.pl/documents/10663/246149/ms_Up9C7wjIxF.pdf
  21. Omarzu T (2017) Chattanooga’s steward advanced materials reinvents itself to stay in business 141 years (photos). Times Free Press, December 24, p 1. Retrieved from http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/business/aroundregion/story/2017/dec/24/chattanoogas-steward-advanced-materials-reinv/459714/
  22. Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (2010) Self-assembled monolayers on mesoporous supports high performance nanoporous sorbents. Retrieved from https://www.pnnl.gov/nano/research/pdf/samms_flier_12-03-2010.pdf
  23. Parker Inc. (2018). Parker filtration for the United States Navy, p 4. Retrieved from http://www.villagemarine.com/images/7937Navy_Brochure-final.pdf
  24. Persson O, Wadsö L (2002) Indoor air quality in submarines. Proceedings: Indoor Air 2002, p 1. Retrieved from https://www.isiaq.org/docs/papers/4D2p2.pdf
  25. Peters JF (2004) Environmental control and life support. In: Spacecraft systems design and operations. Kendall/Hunt, Dubuque, pp 488–506Google Scholar
  26. Raatschen W, Schauer L, Mesnage F (2009) Differences and commonness between submarine and spacecraft life support systems. Paper presented at the seventh submarine air monitoring air purification conference, San Diego, pp 1–9. Retrieved from https://redplanetrecycle.wikispaces.com/file/view/Paper_SAMAP.pdf
  27. Roy R (2011) Making space safer with electrolysis, p 1. The American of Society of Mechanical Engineers. Retrieved from http://www.asme.org/engineering-topics/articles/aerospace-defense/making-space-safer-with-electrolysis
  28. U.S. Department of Navy, U.S. Naval Research Laboratory (2018) Central atmosphere monitoring system. U.S. Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, DC. Retrieved from https://www.nrl.navy.mil/accomplishments/materials/atmosphere-monitoring/

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Project PoSSUMNorfolkUSA

Personalised recommendations