Abstract
Retrieving the etymological meaning of the word “tolerance,” accompanying the evolution of the concept along its history, and exploring some of its major current uses and their impact in common morality and within bioethics, this article proposes to make clear and accurately define the legitimate usage of the term “tolerance.”
“Tolerance” started to be advocated in the wake of the rejection of moral absolutism and gained importance in an increasingly pluralistic world. But its growing hegemony in the moral debate leads dangerously to a moral indifferentism, which subsequently leads to the suppression of morality itself. The issue of the limits of tolerance becomes unavoidable.
In this context, the moral status of tolerance is also examined, being challenged as an ideal, and as a value, and being redefined as a virtue.
This reflection will unfold at the level of philosophical clarification of “tolerance,” the common morality perception of it, and its impact on bioethical theory and practice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (1991). Bioethics and secular humanism. The search for a common morality. London/Philadelphia: SCM Press/Trinity Press International.
Engelhardt, H. T., Jr. (1996). The foundations of bioethics (2nd ed.). New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Locke, J. (1689). A letter on tolerance.http://socserv2.socsci.mcmaster.ca/econ/ugcm/3ll3/locke/toleration.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
Mill, J. S. (1859). On toleration.http://www2.hn.psu.edu/faculty/jmanis/jsmill/liberty.pdf. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
Rawls, J. (1971). A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (Ed.) (1997). Tolerance between intolerance and the intolerable. New York: Berghan Books.
Scanlon, T. (1996). The difficulty of tolerance. In D. Heyd (Ed.), Toleration. An elusive virtue (pp. 226–239). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walzer, M. (1997). On toleration. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Williams, B. (1996). Toleration: An impossible virtue? In D. Heyd (Ed.), Toleration. An elusive virtue (pp. 18–27). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Further Readings
Forst, R. (2007). Toleration. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The stanford encyclopedia of philosophy (Summer 2012 ed.). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2012/entries/toleration/. Accessed 1 Oct 2014.
Heyd, D. (Ed.). (1996). Toleration, an elusive virtue. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Mendus, S., & Edwards, D. (Eds.). (1987). On toleration. Oxford: Clarendon.
Rawls, J. (1987). The idea of an overlapping consensus. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 7(1987), 1–25.
Raz, J. (1988). Autonomy, toleration, and the harm principle. In S. Mendds (Ed.), Justifying toleration. Conceptual and historical perspectives (pp. 155–175). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Ricoeur, P. (1988). Tolérance, intolérance, intolérable. Bulletin de La Société de l’Histoire du Protestantisme Français, 134(2), 435–450. Avril-Juin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Neves, M.P. (2016). Tolerance. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_419
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_419
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities