Skip to main content

Risk

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

In this contribution, the most important developments in risk theory and risk ethics are presented and connected with key issues in the debate on global bioethics. First, a short historical sketch of the development of the fairly young field of risk ethics is provided. This is followed by an exploration of concepts and notions of risk and related notions of uncertainty and ignorance. This discussion is based on work in decision theory, epistemology, and philosophy of science. The main body of this contribution focuses on the link between risk and global bioethics. It starts with a discussion of the role of risk and uncertainty in global bioethics in general. It then discusses values and moral emotions in global bioethics, building on insights from risk perception research. The last section explores the complex interrelationships between risk and responsibility in the context of global bioethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
EUR 32.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or Ebook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anand, S., Peter, F., & Sen, A. (2006). Public health, ethics and equity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2009). Principles of biomedical ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansson, S. O. (1996). Decision-making under great uncertainty. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 26, 369–386.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand, R. (2010a). On non-propositional aspects in modeling complex systems. Analyse & Kritik, 32, 107–120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillerbrand, R. (2010b). Unintended consequences and risky technologies. A virtue ethical approach to the moral problems caused by genetic engineering. In D. Pavlich (Ed.), Environmental justice and global citizenship (pp. 167–183). Amsterdam/New York: Rodopi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahneman, D. (2011). Thinking fast and slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krimsky, S., & Golding, D. (Eds.). (1992). Social theories of risk. Westport: Praeger Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luhmann, N. (1990). Technology, environment, and social risk: A systems perspective. Organization and Environment, 4, 223–231.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nihlén Fahlquist, J. (2006). Responsibility ascriptions and public health problems. Who is responsible for obesity and lung cancer? Journal of Public Health, 14(1), 15–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nihlén Fahlquist, J. (2009). Moral responsibility for environmental problems – Individual or institutional? Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics, 22(2), 109–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S. (2012). Moral emotions as guide to acceptable risk. In S. Roeser, R. Hillerbrand, M. Peterson, & P. Sandin (Eds.), Handbook of risk theory (pp. 819–832). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S., & Todd, C. (Eds.). (2014). Emotion and value. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S., Hillerbrand, R., Peterson, M., & Sandin, P. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of risk theory. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrader-Frechette, K. (1991). Risk and rationality: Philosophical foundations for populist reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P. (2000). The perception of risk. London: Earthscan.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Asveld, L., & Roeser, S. (Eds.). (2009). The ethics of technological risk. London: Earthscan/Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischhoff, B., & Kadvany, J. (2011). Risk: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewens, T. (Ed.). (2007). Risk: Philosophical perspectives. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roeser, S. (Ed.). (2010). Emotions and risky technologies. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Sabine Roeser , Jessica Nihlén Fahlquist or Rafaela Hillerbrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Roeser, S., Fahlquist, J.N., Hillerbrand, R. (2016). Risk. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_388

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics