Abstract
Ethical issues in healthcare and biomedical research are often a matter of public debate. This entry will explore several prominent views on how such debate should be conducted within pluralistic democratic societies. It begins by considering John Rawls’s account of public reason. It then examines how this account applies to the controversial issues of abortion and physician-assisted suicide, where one can see why some have objected to this view, especially with regard to the way it requires citizens to bracket their comprehensive moral, religious, and philosophical doctrines. Next, this entry will consider some alternative approaches that endorse more expansive forms of public reason that allow greater room for appeals to comprehensive doctrines. While one might expect that many of the controversial issues in bioethics will continue to be a matter of public debate going forward, it will be seen that a necessary step towards making progress in these debates is to get clear on how such debate should be conducted.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Dworkin, R., Nagel, T., Nozick, R., Rawls, J., Scanlon, T., & Thomson, J. J. (1997). Assisted suicide: The Philosophers’ brief. The New York review of books. March 27, 1997 issue. Accessed online at: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/1997/mar/27/assisted-suicide-the-philosophers-brief/. Last accessed: 15 Dec 2014.
Finnis, J. (1980). Natural law and natural rights. Oxford: Clarendon.
Finnis, J. (2000). Abortion, natural law, and public reason. In R. P. George & C. Wolfe (Eds.), Natural law and public reason (pp. 75–105). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
George, R. P. (2001). The clash of orthodoxies: Law, religion, and morality in crisis. Wilmington: ISI Books.
Keown, J. (2002). Euthanasia, ethics and public policy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Lee, P., & George, R. P. (2005). The wrong of abortion. In A. I. Cohen & C. H. Wellman (Eds.), Contemporary debates in applied ethics (pp. 13–26). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
Rawls, J. (1993 [2005]). Political liberalism (Expanded ed.). New York: Columbia University Press.
Sandel, M. J. (2005). Public philosophy: Essays on morality in politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (1995). Philosophical arguments. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Taylor, C. (2003). Ethics and ontology. The Journal of Philosophy, 100(6), 305–320.
Taylor, C. (2011). Dilemmas and connections: Selected essays. Cambridge, MA: The Belknap Press of Harvard University.
Thomson, J. J. (1971). A defense of abortion. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1(1), 47–66.
Thomson, J. J. (1995). Abortion. Boston Review, 20 (Summer, 1995). Accessed online at: http://new.bostonreview.net/BR20.3/thomson.php. Last accessed: 15 Dec 2014.
Weithman, P. J. (2002). Religion and the obligations of citizenship. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Further Readings
Dworkin, R. (1993). Life’s dominion: An argument about abortion, euthanasia, and individual freedom. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
George, R. P., & Wolfe, C. (Eds.). (2000). Natural law and public reason. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
Taylor, C., & Maclure, J. (2011). Secularism and freedom of conscience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Weithman, P. J. (Ed.). (1997). Religion and contemporary liberalism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
McPherson, D. (2016). Public Debate. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_357
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_357
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities