Abstract
To fully develop and be a reliable guide to bioethical issues globally, Global Bioethics needs at least these elements: a metaphysical foundation for the dignity of persons and a theory of persons. These principles require exploring from a global perspective principles of moral living, the transcendent character of persons, their orientation to Cosmic Person (or God) that transcends finite personal living, a moral compass, and a basis for interpersonal relationships and community. Personalism is any philosophy that considers personality the supreme value and the key to knowing reality and human rights. Therein lies the significance of Personalism for Global Bioethics. Personalism can provide the elements required for a defensible Global Bioethics. Outside of Christianity and Judaism, few Personalists have developed elements that aid the development of a Global Bioethics and that offer the potential to impact a broad range of current bioethics problems, such as allocation of finite medical and health-care resources, the use and limits of genetic manipulation in support of desired medical outcomes, informed consent, proper land and water use, death and dying, and family relations. These issues require a careful ethical analysis and an ethical framework from which those decisions can adequately be made. Though few Personalists have worked toward developing a Global Bioethics, Personalism is nevertheless rich in potential resources in its three dominant forms: Indian or Hindu, European, and American. Here these resources are identified from a historical viewpoint.
The American form of Personalism took root in the late nineteenth century, flowered in the twentieth century, and continues its life in the twenty-first century. Its earliest roots can be traced to a European form and back through Western philosophy to the Mediterranean basin. Long before its Western form, Personalism thrived in India through the six orthodox schools of Indian philosophy scattered along the Indus River Valley of the Indian subcontinent, developing parallel to Personalism in the West. Personalism did not develop in other areas of the globe, but Personalist themes can be found in many of them, providing rich resources for the development of an ethical framework for a Global Bioethics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Bengtsson, J. O. (2006). The worldview of personalism, origins and early development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bertocci, P. A., & Millard, R. M. (1963). Personality and the good. New York: David McKay, Co.
Bowne, B. P. (1908). Personalism. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
Buford, T. O. (2012). Internet encyclopedia of philosophy. Personalism. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/personal/
Deats, P., & Robb, C. (Eds.). (1986). The boston personalist tradition in philosophy social ethics, and theology. Macon: Mercer University Press.
De Smet, R. (2010). In R. De Smet & I. Coelho (Eds.), Brahman and person, essays. Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass Publishers.
Hegel, G. W. F. (2005). Georg W. F. Hegel’s preface to the phenomenology of spirit. Translated with running commentary by Y. Yirmiyahu. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Howie, J. (2004). W.E. Hocking’s transfigured naturalism. In J. Lachs & D. Hester (Eds.), William ernest hocking reader with commentary (pp. 217–230). Nashville: Vanderbilt University Press.
James, W. (1955). The will to believe and other essays in popular philosophy. New York: Dover.
Kasulis, T. P. (2002). Intimacy or integrity, philosophy and cultural difference. Honolulu: The University of Hawai’i Press.
Kohak, E. (1984). The embers and the stars. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Kruse, C. (2002). Personalism in latin america. In T. O. Buford & H. H. Oliver (Eds.), Personalism revisited, its proponents and critics (pp. 147–156). New York: Rodopi.
Mortensen, J. (2014). The common good. Translated and adapted from original Danish by B. M. Dalton. Fewderiksvaerk: Boedal Publishing.
Sgreccia, E. (2012). Personalist bioethics, foundations and applications (trans: Di Camillo, J. A. & Miller, M. J.). Philadelphia: The National Catholic Bioethics Center.
Werkmeister, W. H. (1981). A history of philosophical ideas in America. Westport: Greenwood.
Further Readings
Crawford, S. C. (2003). Hindu bioethics for the twenty-first century. Albany: State University of New York Press.
Engelhardt, H. T. (Ed.). (2006). Global bioethics, the collapse of consensus. Salem: M. & M. Scrivener Press.
Sgreccia, E. (2012). Personalist bioethics, foundations and applications (trans: Di Camillo, J. A., & Miller, M. J.) Philadelphia: The National Catholic Bioethics Center.
Acknowledgments
This entry draws heavily from “Personalism,” (2012). Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy Personalism. Retrieved from http://www.iep.utm.edu/personal/.
Professor David Edward Shaner, Poteat Professor of Asian Studies, Furman University, and Professor Kenneth Valpey, Oxford Centre for Hindu Studies, provided assistance with the section on South and East Asian Personalism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this entry
Cite this entry
Buford, T. (2016). Personalism. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_333
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_333
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09482-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09483-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities