Skip to main content

Literature

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 33 Accesses

Abstract

Literature has been proposed as a means to enrich an understanding of ethical issues within medicine and health care and as a resource in medical education. Its proponents argue for the value of understanding human suffering and the experience of health care, through literature, rather than solely through the more abstract and analytic philosophical methods of bioethics. Literature is claimed to serve as a corrective to the rational and individualist approaches of bioethics, by drawing attention to “our vulnerable and interdependent human existence.” In this entry, the history of a relationship between ethics and literature is discussed, along with more recent scholarship on the ethical relevance of literature, and research focusing on the constitution of ethics as literary form. It is apparent that literature, and especially futurist writing and science fiction, has an influence on the construction and understanding of ethical issues for both specialist practitioners and the lay public. It is concluded that literature enhances understanding of ethical issues in health care and research, and the manner in which it does so needs to be better understood through the skills of literary analysis as a necessary complement to bioethical analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Brody, H. (1991). Literature and bioethics: Different approaches? Literature and Medicine, 10, 98–110. doi:10.1353/lm.2011.0098.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clayton, J. (2013). The ridicule of time: Science fiction, bioethics, and the posthuman. American Literary History, 25(2), 317–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eagleton, T. (1990). The ideology of the aesthetic. London: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garden, R. E. (2007). The problem of empathy: Medicine and the humanities. New Literary History, 38(3), 551–567. doi:10.1353/nlh.2007.0037.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillett, G., & Bowyer, L. (2014). Bioethics and literature: An exciting overlap. Journal of Bioethical Inquiry, 11(2), 135–136. doi:10.1007/s11673-014-9538-z.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guyer, R. L., & Moreno, J. D. (2004). Slouching toward policy: Lazy bioethics and the perils of science fiction. American Journal of Bioethics, 4(4), W14–W17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hooker, C., & Noonan, E. (2011). Medical humanities as expressive of Western culture. Medical Humanities, 37(2), 79–84. doi:10.1136/medhum-2011-010120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson Jones, A. (2013). Why teach literature and medicine? Answers from three decades. Journal of the Medical Humanities, 34, 415–428. doi:10.1007/s10912-013-9241-9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendal, E. (2015). Utopian visions of “making people”: Science fiction and debates on cloning, ectogenesis, genetic engineering, and genetic discrimination. In P. Stapleton & A. Byers (Eds.), Biopolitics and utopia: An interdisciplinary reader. New York: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneill, P. U. (2011). The arts and medicine: A challenging relationship. Medical Humanities, 37(2), 85–90. doi:10.1136/medhum-2011-010044.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macneill, P. (2014). Ethics and the arts: A critical review of the new moralisms. In Ethics and the arts (pp. 167–178). Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Omobowale, E. B. (2013). Literary physicians: Nigerian medical students, medicine and the art of creative writing. Revista Romana de Bioetica, 7(4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. (2004). Rhetorical literary ethics and lyric narrative: Robert Frost’s ‘home burial.’ Poetics Today, 25(4), 627–651.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rees, G. (2010). The ethical imperative of medical humanities. The Journal of Medical Humanities, 31(4), 267–277. doi:10.1007/s10912-010-9118-0.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Macneill, P. (Ed.). (2014). Ethics and the arts. Heidelberg/New York/London: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (1990). Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phelan, J. (2004). Rhetorical literary ethics and lyric narrative: Robert Frost’s ‘home burial.’ Poetics Today, 25(4), 627–651.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Claire Hooker or Paul Macneill .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Hooker, C., Macneill, P. (2016). Literature. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_274

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics