Skip to main content

Education: Methods

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

The improvements in science and technology attracted attention to the ethical impact of these innovations on humans, the environment, and animals. The need to combine the science of biology with the preservation of human values and to make living being’s future come up to what it could conceivably be became an important issue. Bioethics education came developed to meet this challenge. The popularity of bioethics education grew parallel with the flourishing of the “bioethics concept.” Universities, international organizations, and companies incorporated bioethics education into their curricula in various levels from undergraduate, graduate, to postgraduate. These initiatives as well as short-term courses and short-range programs focusing on particular aspects of bioethics became available. A variety of methods are used to teach bioethics education. Seminars, lectures, and tutorials are the most frequent conventional methodology of bioethics education. More interactive and participatory methods such as case studies, role-plays, out-of-class writing assignments, personal reflection presentations, peer presentations, and peer education became more popular with improvements in the field of adult education. With the emergence of Internet networks, distance learning, web-based learning, and computer-assisted learning methods appear to be new methods with the dual advantage of eliminating obstacles arising from students living in remote geographical areas and limiting financial constraints on the trainees. Although there have been substantial improvements in bioethics education, challenges still exist. The diversity and controversy in approaches to bioethics education regarding objectives, methods, content, and evaluation of teaching are major challenges for bioethics education. Despite this diversity in approaches, there are some well-established bioethics education programs which may serve as examples. The COMEST report 2003 has listed some well-established bioethics education programs. The UNESCO Observatory database holds detailed information about bioethics courses worldwide, in five different languages. The UNESCO database provides the opportunity to compare these courses on several factors such as level of education, context of courses, entry requirements for trainees, course languages, total number of teaching hours, and methodology of the programs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 1,799.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 1,999.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Arda, B. (2014). Ways to improve the bioethics education. In H. Ten Have (Ed.), Bioethics education in a global perspective. Springer (accepted).

    Google Scholar 

  • Callahan, D. (1973). Bioethics as a discipline. The Hastings Center Studies, 1(1), 66–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Claudot, F., Van Baaren-Baudin, A. J., & Chastonay, P. (2006). Medical ethics and human rights training in Europe. Sante Publique, 18(1), 85–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Declaration of Helsinki. (1964) World Medical Association. http://www.wma.net/e/ethicsunit/helsinki.htm. Last date of access 06 May 2014.

  • Eisen, A., & Parker, K. P. (2004). A model for teaching research ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10, 693–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gelhaus, P. (2012). The desired moral attitude of the physician: (II)compassion. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 15, 397–410. doi:10.1007/s11019-011-9368-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honan, J. P., & Rule, C. S. (2002). A guide for faculty and administrators. Published by Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint, 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA 94103-1741 (www.Josseybass.com)

  • http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/global-ethics-observatory/access-geobs/. Last date of accessed 06 May 2014.

  • JHPIEGO. (2009). Clinical training skills (CTS) for health care providers reference manual, JHPIEGO Baltimore- Maryland, 21231-3492, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mc Kneally, M. F., & Singer, P. A. (2001). Bioethics for clinicians: 25. Teaching bioethics in the clinical setting. CMAJ, 164(8), 1163.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mijaljica, G. (2014). Medical ethics, bioethics and research ethics education perspectives in South East Europe in graduate medical education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 20, 237–247. doi:10.1007/s11948-013-9432-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyasaka, M., Akabayashi, A., Kai, I., & Ohi, G. (1999). An international survey of medical ethics curricula in Asia. Journal of Medical Ethics, 25(6), 514–521.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzur, A., Rinčić, I., & Jahr, F. (2011). The Father of European bioethics review paper UDC 608.1(091) Received 17 Feb 2011

    Google Scholar 

  • National Institute of Health. (1949). Nuremberg code. Retrieved 06 May 2014, 2008, from http://ohsr.od.nih.gov/guidelines/nuremberg.html

  • Persad, G. C., Elder, L., Sedig, L., Flores, L., & Emanuel, E. (2008). The current state of medical school education in bioethics, health law, and health economics. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 36(1), 89–94. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.2008.00240.x.

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter, V. R. (1970). Bioethics the bridge to future 1970; http://pages.uoregon.edu/nmorar/Nicolae_Morar/Phil335Win13_files/Potter_BioethicsTheScienceofSurvival.pdf. Last date of accessed 06 May 2014.

  • Singer, P., & Regan, T. (1989). Animal rights and human obligations (pp. 148–162). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ten Have, H., & Gordijn, B. (2012). Broadening education in bioethics. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 15, 99–101. doi:10.1007/s11019-012-9392-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNESCO. (2003). COMEST the teaching of ethics report. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001345/134552mb.pdf. Last date of accessed 06 May 2014.

  • UNESCO. (2011). Casebook on human dignity and human rights, bioethics core curriculum Casebook series, no. 1, UNESCO: Paris, 144 pp.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Perihan Elif Ekmekçi or Berna Arda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Ekmekçi, P.E., Arda, B. (2016). Education: Methods. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09483-0_161

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics