Digitalization of Politics and Elections

Living reference work entry


This chapter is a contribution to the discussion on how cyber-development will transform present scopes of democratic participation into new online and multichannel-based structures of democratic partaking. In this context, the possibility of online voting is expected to be a significant instrument. Elections are the heartbeats of democracies, but it seems that the heartbeats of people nowadays follow their PEDs (Personal Electronic Devices) clock rate. Mobile technology is embedded in our lives and also in nearly all communication processes. Political campaign management and digital interactions via mobile applications have become more and more common in the political systems of the world. For years, project founders of new voting technologies have tried to implement people’s interests in policy processes with the help of digital technologies. Since a new security technology of online financial services named block chain arrived in the global stock market and the US stock market Nasdaq launched the first trading platform on its base in 2015, it is time to discuss and adoption of this system in online voting (also called i-voting), making election processes more attractive and raise turnout.


Cyber-development Election Block chain Personal electronic devices Online voting Calculus of voting Social media Digital revolution of politics 


  1. Austria Government, Financial Service. (2016). Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  2. Bæk, D. (2014). Past, present and future of mobile apps: Interview with Daniel, managing partner of Nodes. Accessed 7 Jan 2016.
  3. Buettner, R. (2015). A systematic literature review of Twitter research from a socio-political revolution perspective. doi:10.13140/RG.2.1.4239.9442.Google Scholar
  4. CIA, Central Intelligence Agency. (2013). World factbook: Suffrage at Central Intelligence Agency. Retrieved 16 Aug 2013. Accessed 1 Jan 2016.
  5. Cohen, D. (2012). Facebook, CNN launch I’m Voting App. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  6. Daniel, M. (2015). Blockchain technology: The key to secure online voting, bitcoinmagazine. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  7. Downs, A. (1957). Economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, Journal of Political Economy, 65(2), 135–150. Published by University of Chicago Press. Stable URL: Accessed 2 Feb 2016.
  8. Dreyer, K. (2015). Mobile Internet usage skyrockets in past 4 years to overtake desktop as most used digital platform, Digital Future in Focus report. Accessed 3 Feb 2016.
  9. Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M., & Pelzer, B. (2012). Weather conditions and voter turnout in Dutch national parliament elections, 1971–2010. Springer. doi:10.1007/s00484–011–0477-7. Accessed 3 Feb 2016.Google Scholar
  10. Enos, R. D., & Fowler, A. (2014). Pivotality and turnout: Evidence from a field experiment in the aftermath of a tied election. Political Science Research and Methods, 2, 309–319. doi:10.1017/psrm.2014.5. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Estonia Government Homepage. (2016). Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  12. (2014). Efficacité et Transparence des Acteurs Européens, PLC. Accessed 2 Feb 2016.
  13. Flynn, K. (2014). Your iPhone can be hacked with a photo of your thumb, Huffington Post, 12/31/2014, Content: “Jan Krissler, a German hacker demonstrated the hack at the annual Chaos Computer Club convention on Dec. 27. 2014” published on Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  14. Fowler, J. H. (2006). Altruism and turnout. Journal of Politics, 68(3), 674–683. University of California, August 2006. Accessed 3 Feb 2016.
  15. Gomez, B. T., Hansford, T. G., & Krause, G. A. (2007). The republicans should pray for rain: Weather, turnout, and voting in U.S. presidential elections, 2007, published in the Journal of Politics. Accessed 17 Oct 2015.
  16. Gross, D. (2011). CNN, Why can’t Americans vote online? Updated 1609 GMT (0009 HKT) November 8, 2011. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  17. Hope, B., & Casey, M. J. (2015). A bitcoin technology gets Nasdaq Test, pilot to take place in fledgling Nasdaq Private Market. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  18. Lin, G., & Espinoza, N. (2007). Florida congressional elections: November 2006, Stanford University, United States, 2006. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  19. Mitterlehner, R. (2016). (ITV) in Ö1 Morgenjournal 14th September 2016, audio reference:
  20. Nakamoto, S. (2009). Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  21. Nudge. (2016). Definition: “A light touch or push.” The Oxford Pocket Dictionary of Current English. 2009. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  22. Online Index, PEJ New Media Index. (2009). Iran and the Twitter revolution, PEJ, New Media Index June 15–19, 2009, Pew Research Center 1615 L street, NW, Suite 800 Washington, DC 20036. Accessed 4 Dec 2015.
  23. OSCE. (2016). Election observers, information. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  24. Perez, S. (2014). Majority of digital media consumption now takes place in mobile apps., accessed 24 Nov 2015, referring to the U.S. Mobile App Report, August 21, 2014, Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  25. Perssona, M., Sundella, A., & Öhrvallb, R. (2014). Does election day weather affect voter turnout? Evidence from Swedish elections. Electoral Studies, 33, 335–342. Accessed 1 Feb 2016.
  26. Riker, W. H., & Ordeshook, P. C. (1968). A theory of the calculus of voting. American Political Science Review, 62. Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  27. Sheldon, B. (2016). Instagram: Motives for its use and relationship to narcissism and contextual age. Computers in Human Behavior, 58, 89–97. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2015.12.059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Squatriglia, C. (2008, November 4). It’s time for drive-thru voting. Wired Magazine. Accessed 19 Jan 2016.
  29. Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (2008). Nudge: Improving decisions about health, wealth, and happiness. e-book online Accessed 4 Feb 2016. Cass R. Sunstein biography data taken from Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  30. Sunstein, C. R., & Thaler, R. H. (Q/A, n.d.). Questions for Richard Thaler and Cass Sunstein Accessed 4 Feb 2016.
  31. Yang, C., Chen, H., & Honga, K. (2003). Visualization of large category map for Internet brows. Decision Support Systems, 35, 89–102. doi:10.1016/S0167-9236(02)00101-X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Education and InnovationViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations