Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Circumcision, Male

  • Living reference work entry
  • Latest version View entry history
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

  • 73 Accesses

Abstract

This entry provides some information about the rich history of male circumcision, distinguishes between four clusters of reasons for male circumcision, and discusses shortly the differences and commonalities between male and female circumcision. The ethics part focuses on the following four issues: (1) the (lack of) scientific evidence regarding medical harms and benefits, (2) respect for the child’s and its parents’ rights, (3) the right on bodily integrity, and (4) the moral weight of cultural considerations and its relation to global bioethics. It concludes that in the debate about male circumcision, there is a tension between (1) general abstract principles such as individual autonomy, self-determination, the child’s right on an open future, and bodily integrity, (2) evidence-based medicine that inspired scientific findings about harms and benefits, (3) cultural considerations, and (4) practical and individual circumstances. In general, there seems to be a tendency toward a more skeptic stance toward male circumcision, even within religious communities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ahmad, A. (2014). Do motives matter in male circumcision? ‘Conscientious objection’ against the circumcision of a Muslim child with a blood disorder. Bioethics, 28, 67–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision. (2012). Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics, 130, 585–586.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baker, R. (1998). A theory of international bioethics: Multiculturalism, postmodernism, and the bankruptcy of fundamentalism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 8, 201–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benatar, M., & Benatar, D. (2003). Between prophylaxis and child abuse: The ethics of neonatal male circumcision. American Journal of Bioethics, 3, 35–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, D. S. (2000–2001). Male and female genital alteration: A collision course with the law? Health Matrix: Journal of Law-Medicine, 11, 487–570.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, W. (2009). Routine (non-religious) neonatal circumcision and bodily integrity. A transatlantic dialogue. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 19, 125–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dekkers, W., Hoffer, C., & Wils, J.-P. (2005). Bodily integrity and male and female circumcision. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 8, 179–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denniston, G. C., Hodges, F. M., & Milos, M. F. (Eds.). (1999). Male and female circumcision. Medical, legal, and ethical considerations in pediatric practice. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Earp, B. D. (2013a). The ethics of infant male circumcision. Journal of Medical Ethics, 39, 418–420.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earp, B. D. (2013b). Criticising religious practices. The Philosopher’s Magazine, Issue 63, 4th Quarter, 15–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisch, M., et al. (2013). Cultural bias in the AAP’s 2012 technical report and policy statement on male circumcision. Pediatrics, 131, 796–800.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gollaher, D. L. (2000). Circumcision. A history of the world’s most controversial surgery. New York: Basis Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, J. (1999). Jewish circumcision: An alternative perspective. BJU International, 83(Suppl 1), 22–27.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. (1997). Lectures on ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. (1999). Against relativism. Cultural diversity and the search for ethical universals in medicine. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (1996). Routine neonatal circumcision: Symbol of the birth of the therapeutic state. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 21, 37–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Denniston, G. C., Hodges, F. M., & Milos, M. F. (Eds.). (2004). Flesh and blood. Perspectives on the problem of circumcision in contemporary society. New York: Kluwer/Plenum Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Special Issue of the Journal of Medical Ethics: Issue 7 of volume 39 (July 2013). This issue is devoted entirely to the ethics of infant male circumcision

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Scientific Institute for Quality of Healthcare (IQ), Radboud University Medical Center, 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands

    Wim Dekkers

Authors
  1. Wim Dekkers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wim Dekkers .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Duquesne University Center for Healthcare Ethics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Henk ten Have

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Dekkers, W. (2015). Circumcision, Male. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_80-2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_80-2

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Chapter history

  1. Latest

    Circumcision, Male
    Published:
    13 November 2015

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_80-2

  2. Original

    Circumcision, Male
    Published:
    03 November 2014

    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_80-1

Search

Navigation