Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in
Book cover

Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics pp 1–11Cite as

Plagiarism

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Plagiarism is an ethical issue of considerable practical impact, affecting educational systems and research worldwide, but also influencing art, music, and literature. The academic discussion on plagiarism in basic education mainly concerns its frequency and explanation and potential countermeasures. Ethical aspects more often come to the fore in the discussions of plagiarism in research, particularly concerning plagiarism of text, where there is considerable disagreement. While plagiarism is frequently brought up as an important aspect of scientific misconduct in research ethical guidelines, and a variety of definitions have been offered in this context, such documents rarely reflect a deeper understanding of the concept, its relation to similar concepts, its embeddedness in specific practices, or its normative implications. More research on these issues is needed, although suggestions have been made as to how plagiarism should be understood, demarcated, explained, detected, normatively analyzed, and counteracted. One theme with an obvious global focus concerns the cultural dependence of attitudes toward plagiarism, for instance, whether differences in perception and practice can be explained by differences in relation to authorities. An important point for the future is whether or not present practices regarding plagiarism need to be changed in order to better promote progress in research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  • Anderson, M. S., & Steneck, N. H. (2011). The problem of plagiarism. Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations, 29, 90–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouville, M. (2008). Plagiarism: Words and ideas. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14, 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruton, S. V. (2014). Self-plagiarism and textual recycling: Legitimate forms of research misconduct. Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, 21(3), 176–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eco, U. (1990). The limits of interpretation. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hayes, N., & Introna, L. D. (2005). Cultural values, plagiarism, and fairness: When plagiarism gets in the way of learning. Ethics & Behavior, 15(3), 213–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgesson, G. (2014). Time for a change in the understanding of what constitutes text plagiarism? Research Ethics, 10(4), 187–195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgesson, G., & Eriksson, S. (2015). Plagiarism in research. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 18(1), 91–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kombe, F., Anunobi, E. N., Tshifugula, N. P., Wassenaar, D., Njadingwe, D., Mwalukore, S., Chinyama, J., Randrianasolo, B., Akindeh, P., Dlamini, P. S., Ramiandrisoa, F. N., & Ranaivo, N. (2014). Promoting research integrity in Africa: An African voice of concern on research misconduct and the way forward. Developing World Bioethics, 14(3), 158–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moffat, B., & Elliot, C. (2007). Ghost marketing: Pharmaceutical companies and ghostwritten journal articles. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 18–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Science Foundation. (2012). Research misconduct. 45-CFR-689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okonta, P., & Rossouw, T. (2013). Prevalence of scientific misconduct among a group of researchers in Nigeria. Developing World Bioethics, 13(3), 149–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, A. (1996). Borrowing others’ words: Text, ownership, memory and plagiarism. TESOL Quarterly, 30, 210–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roig, M. (2014). Journal editorials on plagiarism: What is the message? European Science Editing, 40, 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stretton, S., Bramich, N. J., Keys, J. R., Monk, J. A., Ely, J. A., Haley, C., & Wolley, M. J. (2012). Publication misconduct and plagiarism retractions: A systematic, retrospective study. Current Medical Research & Opinion, 28, 1575–1583.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun, Y. (2013). Do journal authors plagiarize? Using plagiarism detection software to uncover matching text across disciplines. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 12, 264–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wager, E. (2014). Defining and responding to plagiarism. Learned Publishing, 27, 33–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Carroll, J. (2007). A handbook for deterring plagiarism in higher education (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff and Learning Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • CODEX – rules & guidelines for research. Website at www.codex.vr.se

  • Retraction Watch. Tracking retractions as a window into the scientific process. Website at http://retractionwatch.com

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden

    Gert Helgesson

Authors
  1. Gert Helgesson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gert Helgesson .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Duquesne University Center for Healthcare Ethics, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA

    Henk ten Have

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Helgesson, G. (2015). Plagiarism. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_340-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_340-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation