Skip to main content

Mental Illness: Concept of

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics
  • 275 Accesses

Abstract

At the global level, sufferers of mental illness encounter discrimination and bias, are devalued as persons, and are often disregarded by medical and scientific communities, especially when the illness is unidentifiable within a classification system or diagnostic category. Although there are shared experiences and stories among persons with mental illness, the concept of mental illness is defined and interpreted differently across cultures and contexts. Thus, a singly understood concept may not be fully achievable despite ongoing philosophical and scientific debates about the nature of mind and its relation to the body. However, the divide between eastern and western cultures may begin to shorten with a more holistic understanding of the subject of mental illness – the embodied person. The gap between east and west is not simply filled with a universal medical model or a definition of mental illness, but a common understanding of the human condition and an appreciation of the illness narrative of the embodied person. This is but a brief examination into the complex concept of mental illness and the proposed need for a shared, holistic view of the subject of mental illness within and external to the medical milieu.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akhtar, S. (1988). Four culture-bound psychiatric syndromes in India. International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 34, 70–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aultman, J. (2010). The diseased embodied mind: Constructing a conception of mental disease in relation to the person. Medicine, Health Care, and Philosophy, 13, 321–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banja, J. (1997). Defining disease. Praxis makes perfect. In J. M. Humber & F. Almeder (Eds.), What is disease? (Biomedical ethics reviews). Totowa: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. (1975). On the distinction between disease and illness. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 5, 49–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boorse, C. (1997). A rebuttal on health. In J. M. Humber & F. Almeder (Eds.), What is disease? (Biomedical ethics reviews). Totowa: Humana Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fulford, K. W. M. (1989). Moral theory and medical practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakar, S. (1984). Shamans, mystics, and doctors. A psychological inquiry into India and its healing tradition. London: Unwin Paperbacks.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordenfelt, L. (2007). The concepts of health and disease revisited. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 10, 5–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osler, W. (1932). Aequanimitas (3rd ed.). Philadelphia: The Blakiston Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reich, W. (1999). Psychiatric diagnosis an ethical problem. In S. Bloch, P. Chodoff, & S. A. Green (Eds.), Psychiatric ethics (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schramme T. (2000). Patienten und Personen: Zum Begriff der psychischen Krankheit [Patients and Persons: On the Concept of Mental Illness]. Frankfurt: Fischer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stier, M. (2013). Normative preconditions for the assessment of mental disorder. Frontiers in Psychology 4:611. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3766858/#B7. Accessed 14 July 2015.

  • Szasz, T. (1974). The myth of mental illness: Foundations of a theory of personal conduct. New York: Harper and Row.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Szasz, T. (2001). Mental illness: psychiatry’s phlogiston. J Med Ethics, 27:297–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tengland, P.-A. (2007). A two-dimensional theory of health. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 28, 257–284.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (1948). Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference, New York, 19–22 June 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States (Official Records of the World Health Organization, no. 2, p. 100) and entered into force on 7 April 1948.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Bloch, S., & Green, S. (Eds.). (2009). Psychiatric ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caldwell-Harris, C. L., & Ayçiçegi, A. (2006). When personality and culture clash: The psychological distress of allocentrics in an individualist culture and idiocentrics in a collectivist culture. Transcult. Psychiatry, 43, 331–361. doi:10.1177/1363461506066982.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernando, S. (2014). Mental health worldwide: Culture, globalization, and development. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (2006). History of madness (ed & trans: Khalfa, J. & trans: Murphy, J.). New York: Routledge.

  • Nordenfelt, L. (2000). Action, ability and health: Essays in the philosophy of action and Welfare. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Thornton, T. (2007). Essential philosophy of psychiatry: International perspectives in philosophy and psychiatry. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wakefield, J. C. (2007). The concept of mental disorder: Diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry, 6, 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Julie Aultman .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Aultman, J. (2015). Mental Illness: Concept of. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_289-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_289-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics