Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Henk ten Have

Mediation

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_280-1

Abstract

Management of clinical disputes in healthcare is a universally acknowledged concern. The traditional, recommendation-focused model of clinical ethics consultation (CEC) employed by hospital ethics committees (HECs) or their designees has been criticized, while bioethics mediation has been increasingly embraced, in theory, as an alternative approach to the delivery of CEC. Unfortunately, the endorsement of mediation has arrived in the absence of consensus as to its implementation and to the training and credentialing of its practitioners. As a result, there have been few dedicated bioethics mediation programs in US medical institutions. This entry begins with a description of mediation as a dispute resolution process and a brief history of bioethics mediation. It then focuses on the ethical dimensions of bioethics mediation along with theoretical and practical controversy in the bioethics community that has impeded widespread adoption of a bioethics mediation model for the management of CEC.

Keywords

Mediation Bioethics mediation Clinical ethics mediation Clinical ethics consultation Dispute resolution Moral uncertainty Moral aporia Hospital ethics committees Confidentiality Narrative ethics Pluralism Principlism Values Trust 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access

References

  1. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (1998). Task force report on ethics consultation, Core competencies, 6–8, American Society for Bioethics and Humanities, Glenview, ILGoogle Scholar
  2. American Society for Bioethics and Humanities. (2011). Task force report on core competencies for healthcare ethics consultation, 24 Google Scholar
  3. Bergman, E. (2013). Surmounting elusive barriers: The case for bioethics mediation. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 24(1), 11–24.Google Scholar
  4. Charon, R., & Montello, M. (2002). Stories matter: The role of narrative in medical ethics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Danner Clouser, K., & Gert, B. (1997). A critique of principlism. In Bioethics: An introduction to the history, methods, and practice. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett.Google Scholar
  6. Dubler, N., & Liebman, C. (2011). Bioethics Mediation: A guide to shaping shared solutions, 2d ed., Nashville: Vanderbilt university press. (2004) 1st ed., New York:United Hospital Fund.Google Scholar
  7. Dubler, N., Webber, M., Swiderski, D., & Faculty and the National Working Group for the Clinical Ethics Credentialing Project. (2009). Charting the future: Credentialing, privileging, quality, and evaluation in clinical ethics consultation. Hastings Center Report, 39(6), 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fiester, A. (2014). Mediation and the end of clinical ethics as we know it. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(2), 501–513.Google Scholar
  9. Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States hospitals: A national survey. American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13.Google Scholar
  10. Hoffmann, D. (1994). Mediating life and death decisions. Arizona Law Review, 36, 821–877.Google Scholar
  11. HOPE Report. (2012). Mediation in healthcare. Brussels.Google Scholar
  12. Moore, C. (1996). The mediation process: Practical strategies for resolving conflict. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  13. Scott, C. (2014). Ethics consultations and conflict engagement in health care. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(2), 363–423.Google Scholar
  14. Shell, G. R. (2006). Bargaining for advantage. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Walker, M. (1993). Keeping moral space open: New images of ethics consulting. Hastings Center Report, 23(2), 33–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Bergman, E. (2014). Managing conflict in clinical health care with diminished reliance on third party intervention: Forging an ethical and legal mandate for effective physician-patient communication. Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law Journal of Conflict Resolution, 15(2), 473–499.Google Scholar
  2. Bergman, E., & Fiester, A. (2014). The future of clinical ethics education: Value pluralism, communication, and mediation. In A. Akabayashi (Ed.), The future of bioethics international dialogues (pp. 703–711). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Fiester, A. (2015). Neglected ends in healthcare ethics consultation: Bioethics mediation & the prospects for closure. American Journal of Bioethics, 15(1), 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Perelman School of MedicineUniversity of PennsylvaniaPhiladelphiaUSA