Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Living Edition
| Editors: Henk ten Have

Artificial Organs

  • Anne-Marie Duguet
Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_27-1

Abstract

Artificial organs are used in medical practice to replace an organ or a failing function, and many prostheses have been developed for this purpose. Based on technical developments, the prostheses are increasingly efficient and not only can recover a lost function but sometimes do better than the organ or joint replaced which raises the question of enhancement. One of ethical questions is the boundary between the two. How far should the failing function be replaced? Increasing the individual’s abilities, is it acceptable?

Biotechnology and miniaturization of devices has enabled the development of genuine artificial organs such as the artificial heart which aims to replace the natural organ that is definitively and irreversibly altered. In such circumstances, the replacement of vital organs raises the issue of the duration and quality of survival. Since these situations are still experimental, ethical questioning concerns the conditions of the experiment, the choice of subjects, and the information given to them. The subject will have the choice between the artificial heart and ventricular assist devices that are used for several years. Ethical reflection on artificial prolongation of life and the decisions to switch off the assistance device will be presented.

Finally artificial organs pave the way to new technologies and to choices of research that might generate excessive belief by the public in machine reliability and provide excessive hopes.

Keywords

Artificial organs Ethics Prosthesis Artificial heart Enhancement Left ventricular assistance 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. CCNE Opinion 82, 6 February 2004 Composite tissue allotransplantation (Full or partial facial transplant) available in English www.ccne-ethique.fr visited on 10 Oct 2015.
  2. Frankel, M. S., & Kapustij, C. J. (2008). Enhancing humans. In M. Crowley (Ed.), From birth to death and bench to clinic: The hastings center bioethics briefing book for journalists, policymakers, and campaigns (pp. 55–58). Garrison: The Hastings Center.Google Scholar
  3. Guizzo, E. (13 May 2014). IEEE Spectrum Dean Kamen’s « Luke arm » Prosthesis receives FDA Approval http://www.dekaresearch.com/founder.shtml visited on 10 Oct 2015.
  4. Milner, P. C., Payne, J. N., Stanfield, R. C., Lewis, P. A., Jennison, C., & Saul, C. (2004). Inequalities in accessing hip joint replacement for people in need. European Journal of Public Health, 2004(14), 58–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Neragi-Miandoabb, S. (2014). No transplant surgical therapy options of heart failure. Minerva Cardioangiologica, 62(6), 481–496.Google Scholar
  6. Nicholson, J. (2013). Reflection on the ethics on biomaterials science. New Bioethics, 19((1), 54–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Palese, E. (2012). Robots and cyborgs: To be or to have a body? Poiesis & Praxis, 8(4), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Russell Stuart contributor What do you think about machines that think? Today’s learning thinkers on the Age of Machine Jonh Brockman Ed 2015 Edge Foundation http://edge.org/response-detail/26157 consulted on 2 December 2015 University of Michigan Kellogg Eye Center January 29, 2014: http://www.kellogg.umich.edu/news/14/first-retinal-prosthesis-implant.html visited on 10 October 2015.
  9. Swetz, K. M., Cook, K. E., Ottenberg, A. L., Chang, N., & Mueller, P. S. (2013). Clinician’s attitudes regarding withdrawal of left ventricular assist devices in patients approaching the end of life. European Journal of Heart Failure, 15(11), 1262–1266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Miller, G. E. (2006). Artificial organs (Synthesis lectures on biomedical engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1–72). Morgan Claypool publishers. http://www.morganclaypool.com/doi/abs/10.2200/S00023ED1V01Y200604BME004
  2. Warwick, K. (2003). Cyborg morals, cyborg values, cyborg ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 5, 131–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.UMR/INSERM Unit 1027Senior Lecturer University Paul Sabatier Faculté de MédecineToulouseFrance