Freedom of Speech
Freedom of speech is a fundamental right that can be defended on consequentialist and deontological grounds. Free speech in bioethics has been under threat for 50 years and is perhaps more vulnerable since the millennium due to the new rhetoric of intolerance and new laws suppressing speech. Nevertheless, it is evident that free speech is a necessity for the proper conduct of bioethics, especially given the ethical challenges that the global diffusion of biotechnology has brought and will continue to bring. That necessity can be defended on the very same grounds that the general liberty can be defended.
KeywordsFreedom Liberty Right Duty Speech Expression Bioethics Global Consequences Autonomy Self-possession Self-assertion
- Flew, A. (1991). Thinking about social thinking. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
- Holmes, O. W. (1919). Dissenting in Abrams V. United States. 250 US 616. Supreme Court.Google Scholar
- http://www.cbc.ca/news/world/free-speech-eh-why-is-canada-prosecuting-mark-steyn-1.720445. Last consulted 31 Oct 2015.
- Mill, J. S. (1859/1975). On liberty. In Three essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Scanlon, T. (1972). A theory of free expression. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 1, 204–226.Google Scholar
- Shackel, N. (2013b). Pseudoscience and idiosyncratic theories of rational belief. In M. Pigliucci & M. Boudry (Eds.), The philosophy of pseudoscience. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
- Singer, P. (2001). On being silenced in Germany. In Writings on an ethical life. London: Fourth Estate.Google Scholar
- Thouless, R. H., & Thouless, C. R. (2011). Straight and crooked thinking (4th ed.). London: Hodder and Stoughton.Google Scholar
- Yandle, B. (1983). Bootleggers and baptists: The education of a regulatory economist. Regulation, 7(3), 12–16.Google Scholar