Skip to main content

Evolutionary Perspectives in Ethics

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics

Abstract

The evolutionary perspective in ethics is a controversial current that considers the moral sense of human beings to be the outcome of natural selection. Much criticism has sought to rebut this thesis. Recently, the introduction of invasive technologies in ontogenetic and phylogenetic processes of life has revived the bioethical debate on the legitimacy of evolutionary perspectives in ethics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ayala, F. J. (2010). The difference of being human: Morality. PNAS, 107, 9015–9022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barash, D. P. (1977). Sociobiology and behavior. New York: Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braidotti, R. (2002). Metamorphoses: Towards a materialist theory of becoming. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J. J. (1970). On the unity and diversity. American Anthropologist, 72, 545–554.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman, M. W., & Cavalli-Sforza, L. L. (1976). Cultural and evolutionary biological processes: Selection for a trait under complex transmission. Theoretical Population Biology, IX, 238–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Vrba, E. S. (1982). Exaptation a missing term in the science of form. Paleobiology, 8(1), 4–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haraway, D. J. (1991). A cyborg manifesto science, technology, and socialist-feminism in the late twentieth century. In Simians, cyborgs and women: The reinvention of nature (pp. 149–181). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. (2006). Moral minds: How nature designed a universal sense of right and wrong. New York: Harper Collins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurzweil, R. (2005). The singularity is near: When humans transcend biology. New York: Viking.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (1991). Biology as ideology. The doctrine of DNA. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchesini, R. (2002). Post-human. Verso nuovi modelli di esistenza. Torino: Bollati-Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • More, M. (2004). The proactionary principle. http://www.extropy.org/proactionaryprinciple.htm. Accessed 31 Jan 2015.

  • Murdock, G. (1965). Culture and society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, E. O. (1975). Sociobiology: The new synthesis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Further Readings

  • Harris, J. (2007). Enhancing evolution. The Ethical case for making better people. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jablonka, E., & Lamb, M. (2005). Evolution in four dimensions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewontin, R. (2000). It aint necessarily so: The dream of the human genome and other illusions. New York: NYRB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J. (1986). A defense of evolutionary ethics. Biology and Philosophy, 1, 265–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guido Nicolosi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht

About this entry

Cite this entry

Nicolosi, G., Maestrutti, M. (2015). Evolutionary Perspectives in Ethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_185-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_185-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics