Abstract
Communication ethics assumes a distinctive perspective of bioethics, engaging it from two principal standpoints: biopolitics and post-human. These two perspectives yield a targeted standpoint on communication ethics. The notion of communication ethics does not suggest a uniform or universal assertion about what is and is not ethical. The term “communication ethics” is more aptly understood within (Gadamer, H. G. (1988). Truth and method. New York: The Crossroads Publishing Company. (Original work published 1975)) conception of “horizon” (p. 217). Theorized in visual terms, a horizon implies a series of images in the distance; the horizon is composed of multiplicity and fuzzy clarity. A horizon is akin to an impressionistic painting that invites a number of glimpses and perspectives, all temporal and partial. The question of bioethics from the vantage point of communication ethics does not dictate correct answers. The task is to open the conversation by unmasking unstated presuppositions. The first obligation of communication ethics is the act of understanding, not the conversion of the ignorant into correct ethical alignment. Communication ethics understood as content or a sense of the good furnishes moral gravity, simultaneously assuming the pragmatic reality of multiplicity. Distancing communicative ethics from universal truth counters imposition, bullying, and historical campaigns reminiscent of colonialism and totalitarianism in the name of self-righteous assurance.
References
Arnett, R. C. (2012). Biopolitics: An Arendtian communication ethic in the public domain. Communication and Cultural/Critical Studies, 9(2), 225–233.
Arnett, R. C., Fritz, J. M. H., & Bell, L. M. (2009). Communication ethics literacy: Dialogue and difference. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Bonhoeffer, D. (1972). Letters & papers from prison (The enlarged edition. Ed. E. Bethge.). New York: Macmilian Publishing. (Original work published 1953).
Ellul, J. (1990). The technological bluff (G. W. Bromily, Trans.). Grand Rapids: Eerdmans. (Original work published 1964).
Foucault, M. (1997). “Society must be defended”: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1975–1976 (D. Macey, Trans.). New York: Picador.
Hyde, M. J. (2013). Perfection: Coming to terms with being human. Waco: Baylor University Press.
Hyde, M. J., & King, N. M. P. (2010). Communication ethics and bioethics: An interface. The Review of Communication, 10, 156–171.
Kuhn, T. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago Press. (Original work published 1962).
MacIntyre, A. (1984). After virtue: A study in moral theory (2nd ed.). Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press. (Original work published 1981).
MacMillian, A. (2011). Empire, biopolitics, and communication. Journal of Communication Inquiry, XX(X), 1–6.
McKerrow, R. E. (2011). Foucault’s relationship to rhetoric. The Review of Communication, 11, 253–271.
Negri, A. (2008). The labor of the multitude and the fabric of biopolitics. M. Coté (Ed.). (S. Mayo & P. Graefe with M. Coté, Trans.). Meditations: Journal of the Marxist Literary Group, 23(2), 1–7.
Further Readings
Hyde, M. J., & Herrick, J. A. (2013). After the genome: A language for our own biotechnological future. Waco: Baylor University Press.
King, N. M. P., & Hyde, M. J. (Eds.). (2014). Bioethics, public moral argument, and social responsibility. New York: Routledge. (Original work published 2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht
About this entry
Cite this entry
Arnett, R.C. (2014). Communication: Ethics. In: ten Have, H. (eds) Encyclopedia of Global Bioethics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_109-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05544-2_109-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05544-2
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities