Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy

Living Edition
| Editors: Marco Sgarbi

Law, Renaissance Idea of Natural

Living reference work entry
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_71-1

Abstract

The introduction of laws of nature is often seen as one of the hallmarks of the scientific revolution of the seventeenth century. The new sciences are thought to have introduced the revolutionary idea that explanations of natural phenomena have to be grounded in exceptionless regularities of universal scope, i.e., laws of nature. The use of legal terminology to talk about natural regularities has a longer history, though. This article traces these earlier uses.

Keywords

Legal Terminology Exceptionless Regularities Natural Regularity Universal Scope Divine Governance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Adams, Marilyn McCord. 2013. Powers versus laws. In The Divine order, the human order, and the order of nature, ed. Eric Watkins, 3–26. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Armogathe, Jean-Robert. 2008. Deus legislator. In Natural law and laws of nature in early modern Europe: Jurisprudence, theology, moral and natural philosophy, ed. Lorraine Daston and Michael Stolleis, 265–277. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  3. Asmis, Elizabeth. 2008a. Cicero on natural law and the laws of the state. Classical Antiquity 27 (1): 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asmis, Elizabeth. 2008b. Lucretius’ new world order: Making a pact with nature. The Classical Quarterly 58 (1): 141–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chene, Dennis Des. 2000. On Laws and Ends: A response to Hattab and Menn. Perspectives on Science 8 (2): 144–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chesnut, Glenn F. 1986. The first Christian histories: Eusebius, Socrates, Sozomen, Theodoret, and Evagrius. Macon: Mercer University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Courtine, Jean-François. 1999. Nature et empire de la loi: études suaréziennes. Paris: Vrin.Google Scholar
  8. Crombie, A.C. 1996. Infinite power and the laws of nature: A medieval speculation. In Science, art, and nature in medieval and modern thought, 67–87. London: Hambledon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Daston, Lorraine, and Michael Stolleis, eds. 2008. Natural law and laws of nature in early modern Europe: Jurisprudence, theology, moral and natural philosophy. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  10. Festa, Egidio, and Sophie Roux. 2001. Le “para phusin” et l’imitation de la nature dans quelques commentaires du prologue des Questions mécaniques. In Largo Campo di Filosofare, ed. José Montesinos and Carlos Solis Santos, 237–253. La Orotava: Fundacion Canaria Orotava de Historia de la Ciencia.Google Scholar
  11. Funkenstein, Amos. 1986. Theology and the scientific imagination from the Middle Ages to the seventeenth century. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hartbecke, Karin, and Christian Schütte. 2006. Naturgesetze: Historisch-systematische Analysen eines wissenschaftlichen Grundbegriffs. 1st ed. Paderborn: mentis Verlag.Google Scholar
  13. Henry, John. 2004. Metaphysics and the origins of modern science: Descartes and the importance of laws of nature. Early Science and Medicine 9 (2): 73–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hooker, Richard. 1593. Of the Lawes of Ecclesiasticall Politie. London: John Windet.Google Scholar
  15. Kusukawa, Sachiko. 2008. Nature’s regularity in some protestant natural philosophy textbooks 150–1630. In Natural law and laws of nature in early modern Europe: Jurisprudence, theology, moral and natural philosophy, 105–121. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  16. Lehoux, Daryn. 2006. Laws of nature and natural laws. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 37 (4): 527–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Manzo, Silvia. 2013. The preservation of the whole and the teleology of nature in late medieval, renaissance and early modern debates on the void. Journal of Early Modern Studies 2 (2): 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Milton, John R. 1981. The origin and development of the concept of the ‘laws of nature’. European Journal of Sociology/Archives Européennes de Sociologie 22 (02): 173–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Milton, J.R. 2012. Laws of nature. In The Cambridge history of seventeenth-century philosophy, ed. Daniel Garber and Michael Ayers, 680–701. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Oakley, Francis. 1961. Christian theology and the Newtonian science: The rise of the concept of the laws of nature. Church History 30 (4): 433–457.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Roux, Sophie. 2001. Les lois de la nature à l’âge classique la question terminologique. Revue de Synthèse 122 (2–4): 531–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ruby, Jane E. 1986. The origins of scientific “law”. Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (3): 341–359.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schnepf, Robert. 2006. Gottes Handeln und der Lauf der Natur: Probleme und Perspektiven der theologischen Vorgeschichte des neuzeitlichen Naturgesetzbgriffs im Mittelalter. In Naturgesetze, ed. Karin Hartbecke and Christian Schütte, 85–114. Paderborn: mentis Verlag.Google Scholar
  24. Schramm, Matthias. 1981. Roger Bacons Begriff vom Naturgesetz. In Die Renaissance der Wissenschaften im 12. Jahrhundert, 197–209. Zurich: Artemis.Google Scholar
  25. Specht, Rainer. 1987. Naturgesetz und Bindung Gottes. In Search Results Philosophie im Mittelalter: Entwicklungslinien und Paradigmen, ed. Jan P. Beckmann, Ludger Honnefelder, Gangolf Schrimpf, and Georg Wieland, 409–423. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  26. Specht, Rainer. 2001. Regulae quaedam sive leges naturae. In Kausalität und Naturgesetz in der Frühen Neuzeit, ed. Andreas Hüttemann, 65–75. Stuttgart: Franz Steiner Verlag.Google Scholar
  27. Steinle, Friedrich. 1995. The amalgamation of a concept. Laws of nature in the new sciences. In Laws of nature: Essays on the philosophical, scientific and historical dimensions, ed. Friedl Weinert, 316–368. Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  28. Watkins, Eric. 2013. The Divine order, the human order, and the order of nature. Historical perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. William, J. 1985. Courtenay. The dialectic of omnipotence in the high and late Middle Ages. In Divine omniscience and omnipotence in medieval philosophy, 243–269. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.Google Scholar
  30. Wilson, Catherine. 2008. From limits to Laws: The transformation of ancient atomism in early modern philosophy. In Natural law and laws of nature in early modern Europe: Jurisprudence, theology, moral and natural philosophy, ed. Lorraine Daston and Michael Stolleis, 13–28. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  31. Zilsel, Edgar. 1942. The genesis of the concept of physical law. Philosophical Review 51 (3): 245–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Philosophy and Moral ScienceGhent UniversityGhentBelgium

Section editors and affiliations

  • Marco Sgarbi
    • 1
  • Peter Mack
    • 2
  1. 1.University Ca' Foscari VeniceVeniceItaly
  2. 2.The Warburg Institute, School of Advanced StudyUniversity of LondonLondonUK