Skip to main content

Logic, Renaissance

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy
  • 20 Accesses

Abstract

The European Renaissance inherited a long tradition of logical thought from the ancient and medieval world. The basis of logic was Aristotle, the few works available particularly in Boethius’ translations, which formed the corpus of the Logica Vetus, along with a range of ancient and late antique commentaries and encyclopedic works, most importantly Porphyry’s commentary on the Categories, Cassiodorus’ Institutiones, Galen’s Institutio Logica, and the works of Isidore of Seville and Martianus Capella. Medieval scholastic logic continued this tradition and also expanded on it, especially when, in the thirteenth century, more Aristotelian logical texts became available in Latin translation, including the Prior and Posterior Analytics, forming the corpus of the Logica Nova. A particular focus, which was important for the Renaissance, was the interaction of logic with grammar, in the works of Anselm and Abelard, as well as the development of Logica Modernorum, terministic logic, concerning the denotation of logical terms. In another direction, the thirteenth-century Catalan philosopher Ramon Llull created his own combinatory art as part of a Christian apologetic mission.

The Renaissance both continued and reacted against these trends. Humanists such as Lorenzo Valla, Rudolph Agricola, and Peter Ramus denounced scholastic logic as arid and ineffective and proposed a new focus on a rhetoric capable of convincing an interlocutor. This encouraged also to the rise of logic written in the vernacular. At the same time, the development of empirical science led to new questions about the relationship of logic, mathematic, and the natural world, particularly in the texts of Alessandro Piccolomini and Jacopo Zabarella. These developments would reach a climax in the logical investigation behind Galileo Galilei’s and Francis Bacon’s works, who both attempted to move beyond Aristotelian logic toward a new inductive and empirical science. Finally, René Descartes’ philosophical meditations also presented a new method for logic, which was then developed in Port Royale Logic and which opened the way to a new mathematical and analytical understanding of logic in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

Primary Literature

  • Agricola, Rudolph. 1523. De inventione dialectica libri omnes, ed. Alardus Amstelredamus, Cologne. Reprinted Frankfurt, 1967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agricola, R. 1992. De inventione dialectica libri tres. Drei Bücher über die Inventio dialectica. Auf der Grundlage der Edition von Alardus von Amsterdam (1539) kritisch herausgegeben, übersetzt und kommentiert von Lothar Mundt. Tübingen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1888–1889. Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 4-5: Pars prima Summae theologiae. Roma: Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon, Francis. [1620] 2000. The New Organon, trans. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Lavinheta, Bernardus. 1977. Explanatio compendiosaque applicatio Artis Raymundi Lulli, ed. and intr. Erhard-Wolfram Platzeck, Hildesheim, Gerstenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Descartes, René. [1637] 1994. Discours de la méthode. A bilingual edition and an interpretation of René Descartes’ philosophy of method. Ed. and trans. G. Heffernan. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo, and William A. Wallace. 1988. Galileo Galilei, Tractatio de praecognitionibus et praecognitis and Tractatio de demonstratione. Padova: Antenore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, Galileo, and William A. Wallace. 2011. Galileo’s logical treatises: A translation, with notes and commentary, of his appropriated Latin questions on Aristotle’s posterior analytics book II. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • George of Trebizond. 1450 ca. Isagoge dialectica. Mss. Beinecke Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • George of Trebizond. 1523. Comparatio philosophorum Platonis et Aristotelis. Venice, Jacopo Pencio. Reprint Frankfurt a.M. Minerva 1965.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lullus, Raimundus. 1996. Opera. Reprint of the Strasbourg 1651 edition, ed. and intr. Anthony Bonner, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Massa, Niccolò. 1549. Loica … distinta in sette libri ne li quali con mirabil facilità et brevità si può ogni modo di argomentare così probabile come dimostrativo apprendere. Venice, Francesco Bindoni & Maffeo Pasini.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melanchthon, Philip. 1520. Compendiaria dialectices ratio. Leipzig, Valentin Schumann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, William, and John Longeway. 2006. Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham: A translation of summa Logicae III-II: De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, and selections from the prologue to the Ordinatio. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ockham, William, Philotheus Boehner, Gedeon Gál, and Stephen J. Brown. 1974. Summa logicae. St. Bonaventure: Institutionum Franciscanum, Universitatis S. Bonaventurae.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrus Hispanus. 1972. Tractactus. Called afterwards Summule Logicales, Ed. L.M. De Rijk, Van Gorcum, Assen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1547. Alexandri Piccolominei in mechanicas quaestiones Aristotelis paraphrasis… Elusdem commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum. Roma: Antonio Blado.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1551. L’instrumento della filosofia di M. Alessandro Piccolomini. Rome: Presso Vincenzo Valgrisi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1576. Instrumento della filosofia naturale. Venice, D. Zaneti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponazzi, P. 1525. Tractatus acutissimi, utillimi et mere peripatetici. Venice, Octaviano Scoto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomponazzi, P. 1999. Trattato sull’immortalità dell’anima. Florence, L.S. Olschki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramus, Peter. 1964. Dialecticae institutiones. Aristotelicae animadversiones, Paris 1543. Reprinted Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, introd. W. Risse.

    Google Scholar 

  • Śmiglecki, Marcin (Cristophorus Clavius). 1618. Logica Martini Smiglecii Societatis Jesv, S. Theologiae Doctoris Selectis Dispvtationibus [et] quaestionibus illustrata, Et in duos Tomos distributa, In qua QvicQvid In Aristotelico Organo Vel Cognitv Necessarium, vel obscuritate perplexum … pertractatur; Cum indice Rerum copioso. Ingolstadii: Angermaria.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speroni, Sperone. 1740. Opere. Venice, D. Occhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Speroni, Sperone. 1999. Dialogo delle lingue. Pescara, Libreria dell’Università Ed.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomitano, Bernardino. 1562. Animadversiones aliquot in primum librum Posteriorum Resolutoriorum, Contradictionum Solutiones in Aristotelis et Averrois dicta in primum librum Posteriorum Resolutoriorum, In novem Averrois Quaesita demonstrativa Argumenta, Averrois graviores sententiae in primum ac secundum librum Posteriorum Resolutoriorum per eundem observata. Venice, Luca-Antonio Giunta.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tridapale Dal Borgo, A. 1547. La loica in lingua volgare tanto facile et breve, che ciascuno puo agevolmente et tosto apprendere il vere uso di quelle, et indirizzarsi a tutte le scienze. Con un trattato appresso utiliss. del uso di luoghi de gli argomenti. Venice, Paulo Gherardo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valla, Lorenzo. 1982. Repastinatio dialectice et philosophie, ed. G. Zippel, 2 vols. Padua, Antenore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valla, Lorenzo, Brian P. Copenhaver, and Lodi Nauta. 2012. Dialectical disputations. The I Tatti renaissance library series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varchi, Benedetto. 1859. Opere di Benedetto Varchi. Trieste, Sez. Letterario-Artistica del Lloyd Austriaco.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veneto, Paolo, and Norman Kretzmann. 1979. Pauli Veneti Logica magna. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vives, Juan L. 1520. Adversus pseudodialectos. Sélestat, Lazarus Schürer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zabarella, Jacopo. 1597. Opera logica. Cologne L. Zetzner. (repr. Hildesheim–New York, Minerva, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

Secondary Literature

  • Ariew, R. 1999. Descartes and the late scholastics on the order of the sciences. In Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, 350–364. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ariew, R. 2011. Descartes among the scholastics. Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • BabeS, O. 2014. The persuasive value of demonstration: Descartes’ discourse. Societate si politica 8 (2): 61–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Batllori, Miquel. 2004. Il Lullismo in Italia. Tentativo di sintesi, ed. and intr. by Francesco Santi and Michela Pereira; trad. Francisco José Díaz Marcilla, Pontificio Ateneo. Roma: Antonianum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi, L. 2003. Studi sull’Aristotelismo del Rinascimento. Padua: Il Poligrafo.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackwell, Constance, and Sachiko Kusukawa. 1999. Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Conversations with Aristotle. Aldershot/Hants: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonner, Anthony. 2001. Recent Scholarship on Ramon Llull. Romance Philology. 54 (2): 377–392.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buonocore, E. 2013. The Ur-text of late medieval and renaissance Lullian logic. Textual interrelations between the “Nove introductiones” and two traditional Pseudo-Lullian handbooks of logic: The “Logica parva” and the “Logica brevis et nova”. Studia lulliana 53 (108): 23–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capozzi, M., and G. Roncaglia. 2009. Logic and philosophy of logic from humanism to Kant. In The development of modern logic, ed. Leila Haaparanta, 78–158. Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Copenhaver, Brian P., and Charles B. Schmitt. 2002. Renaissance philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corbini A. 2006. La teoria della scienza nel XIII secolo. I commenti agli Analitici secondi, Sismel–Edizioni del Galluzzo, Firenze.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cozzoli, D. 2007. Alessandro Piccolomini and the certitude of mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2): 151–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dod, Bernard G. 1990. Aristoteles latinus. In Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy, 45–79. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dumont, S. 2005. Duns Scotus’s Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction. Vivarium 43,1:7–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finocchiaro, M.A. 2012. Galileo and the art of reasoning: Rhetorical foundation of logic and scientific method. Vol. 61. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garin, E. 1969. L’età nuova, Naples, Morano.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gatto, R. 2006. Christoph Clavius’ “ordo servandus in addiscendis disciplinis mathematicis” and the teaching of mathematics in Jesuit colleges at the beginning of the modern era. Science & Education 15 (2–4): 235–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaukroger, Stephen. 1989. Cartesian logic: An essay on Descartes’s conception of inference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giacobbe, G.C. 1972. Il Commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum di Alessandro Piccolomini. Physis, 14: 162–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goulding, R. 2006. Method and mathematics: Peter Ramus’s histories of the sciences. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (1): 63–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howell, Wilbur Samuel, and Petrus Ramus. 1961. Logic and rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. New York: Russell & Russell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. 1976. Galileo’s road to truth and the demonstrative regress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 7 (4): 277–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, Lisa. 1992. Humanistic logic. In Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy, 173–198. Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jardine, N. 1997. Keeping order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the offices of philosophy. In Method and order in renaissance philosophy of nature. The Aristotle commentary tradition, ed. D. DiLiscia, E. Kessler, and C. Methuen, 183–209. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laird, W. 1987. Robert Grosseteste on the Subalternate Sciences. Traditio, 43: 147–169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27831201.

  • Longeway, J.L. 2007. Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack, Peter. 2011. A history of renaissance rhetoric 1380–1620. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, Paolo. 1992. Aristotelian logic and euclidean mathematics: Seventeenth-century developments of the quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 23 (2): 241–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mann, W.E. 1992. Duns Scotus, demonstration, and doctrine. Faith and philosophy 9 (4): 436–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikkeli, Heikki. 1993. An Aristotelian response to renaissance humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the nature of arts and sciences. Helsinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mikkeli, Heikki. 1999. The cultural programmes of Alessandro Piccolomini and Sperone Speroni at the Paduan Accademia degli Infiammati in the 1540s. In Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, ed. C. Blackwell and S. Kusukawa, 76–85. Aldershot: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfasani, John. 1976. George of Trebizond: A biography and a study of his rhetoric and logic. Leiden: Brill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monfasani, J. 1990. Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2): 181–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss, J.D., and W.A. Wallace. 2003. Rhetoric & dialectic in the time of Galileo. CUA Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nauta, L. 2007. Lorenzo Valla and the rise of humanist dialectic. Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ong, Walter J. 2004. Ramus: Method and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmieri, P. 2007. Science and authority in Giacomo Zabarella. History of Science 45 (4): 404–427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Ramos, A. 1988. Francis Bacon’s idea of science and the maker’s knowledge tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinborg. 1984. Logica e semantica nel Medioevo. Torino: Boringhieri.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzeck E. W. 1972. Gottfried Willhelm Leibniz y Raimundo Llull. Estudios Lulianos 16: 129–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Platzeck, E.W., and Bernardus de Lavinheta. 1977. Explanatio compendiosaque applicatio Artis Raymundi Lulli. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pomata, Gianna, and Nancy G. Siraisi. 2005. Historia: Empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Randall, John Herman. 1961. The school of Padua and the emergence of modern science. Padova: Editrice Antenore.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz Simon Josep, M. 1999. L’art de Ramon Llull i la teoria escolàstica de la cìencia. Barcellona: Assaig, Quaderns Crema.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi, Francesco. 1986. Osservazioni sul manoscritto 1001 della Biblioteca Riccardiana di Firenze, per la storia del Lullismo nelle regioni meridionali dell’Impero nel secolo XIV. ATCA 5: 231–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Serjeantson, R. 2014. Francis Bacon and the “interpretation of nature” in the late renaissance. Isis 105 (4): 681–705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sgarbi, Marco. 2014. The Italian mind: Vernacular logic in renaissance Italy (1540–1551). Leiden: Brill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Spade, P.V. 2003. Late medieval logic. In Routledge history of philosophy, 402. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, E. 1989. Dialectic and its place in the development of medieval logic. Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stump, E. 1991. Aquinas on the Foundations of Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy; Supplementary Volume 17: 125.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomsen Thornqvist, Christina, and Börje Bydén. 2017. The Aristotelian tradition: Aristotle’s works on logic and metaphysics and their reception in the Middle Ages. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Urbach, Peter. 1993. Francis Bacon’s philosophy of science: An account and a reappraisal. La Salle: Open Court.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dyke, C. 2009. An Aristotelian Theory of Divine Illumination: Robert Grosseteste’s Commentary on the Posterior Analytics. British journal for the history of philosophy, 17 (4): 685–704.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vasoli, C. 2011. Jacopo Zabarella e la “natura” della logica. Rivista di storia della filosofia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vickers, B. 1992. Francis Bacon and the Progress of knowledge. Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (3): 495–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709891.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wainwright, M. 2018. Peter Ramus and the basis of logic. In The rational Shakespeare. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95258-1_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. 1992. Galileo’s logic of discovery and proof: The background, content, and use of his appropriated treatises on Aristotle’s posterior analytics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, W. 1995. Circularity and the Paduan regressus: From Pietro d’Abano to Galileo Galilei. Vivarium 33 (1): 76–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walton, Craig. 1971. Ramus and Bacon on method. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (3): 289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yrjonsuuri, M., and M. Yrjönsuuri, eds. 2001. Medieval formal logic: Obligations, insolubles and consequences. Vol. 49. Springer Science & Business Media.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleonora Buonocore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Section Editor information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this entry

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this entry

Buonocore, E. (2021). Logic, Renaissance. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1059-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1059-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities

Publish with us

Policies and ethics