Abstract
The European Renaissance inherited a long tradition of logical thought from the ancient and medieval world. The basis of logic was Aristotle, the few works available particularly in Boethius’ translations, which formed the corpus of the Logica Vetus, along with a range of ancient and late antique commentaries and encyclopedic works, most importantly Porphyry’s commentary on the Categories, Cassiodorus’ Institutiones, Galen’s Institutio Logica, and the works of Isidore of Seville and Martianus Capella. Medieval scholastic logic continued this tradition and also expanded on it, especially when, in the thirteenth century, more Aristotelian logical texts became available in Latin translation, including the Prior and Posterior Analytics, forming the corpus of the Logica Nova. A particular focus, which was important for the Renaissance, was the interaction of logic with grammar, in the works of Anselm and Abelard, as well as the development of Logica Modernorum, terministic logic, concerning the denotation of logical terms. In another direction, the thirteenth-century Catalan philosopher Ramon Llull created his own combinatory art as part of a Christian apologetic mission.
The Renaissance both continued and reacted against these trends. Humanists such as Lorenzo Valla, Rudolph Agricola, and Peter Ramus denounced scholastic logic as arid and ineffective and proposed a new focus on a rhetoric capable of convincing an interlocutor. This encouraged also to the rise of logic written in the vernacular. At the same time, the development of empirical science led to new questions about the relationship of logic, mathematic, and the natural world, particularly in the texts of Alessandro Piccolomini and Jacopo Zabarella. These developments would reach a climax in the logical investigation behind Galileo Galilei’s and Francis Bacon’s works, who both attempted to move beyond Aristotelian logic toward a new inductive and empirical science. Finally, René Descartes’ philosophical meditations also presented a new method for logic, which was then developed in Port Royale Logic and which opened the way to a new mathematical and analytical understanding of logic in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries.
References
Primary Literature
Agricola, Rudolph. 1523. De inventione dialectica libri omnes, ed. Alardus Amstelredamus, Cologne. Reprinted Frankfurt, 1967.
Agricola, R. 1992. De inventione dialectica libri tres. Drei Bücher über die Inventio dialectica. Auf der Grundlage der Edition von Alardus von Amsterdam (1539) kritisch herausgegeben, übersetzt und kommentiert von Lothar Mundt. Tübingen.
Aquinas, Thomas. 1888–1889. Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, t. 4-5: Pars prima Summae theologiae. Roma: Typographia Polyglotta S. C. de Propaganda Fide.
Bacon, Francis. [1620] 2000. The New Organon, trans. L. Jardine and M. Silverthorne. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Lavinheta, Bernardus. 1977. Explanatio compendiosaque applicatio Artis Raymundi Lulli, ed. and intr. Erhard-Wolfram Platzeck, Hildesheim, Gerstenberg.
Descartes, René. [1637] 1994. Discours de la méthode. A bilingual edition and an interpretation of René Descartes’ philosophy of method. Ed. and trans. G. Heffernan. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.
Galilei, Galileo, and William A. Wallace. 1988. Galileo Galilei, Tractatio de praecognitionibus et praecognitis and Tractatio de demonstratione. Padova: Antenore.
Galilei, Galileo, and William A. Wallace. 2011. Galileo’s logical treatises: A translation, with notes and commentary, of his appropriated Latin questions on Aristotle’s posterior analytics book II. Dordrecht: Springer.
George of Trebizond. 1450 ca. Isagoge dialectica. Mss. Beinecke Library.
George of Trebizond. 1523. Comparatio philosophorum Platonis et Aristotelis. Venice, Jacopo Pencio. Reprint Frankfurt a.M. Minerva 1965.
Lullus, Raimundus. 1996. Opera. Reprint of the Strasbourg 1651 edition, ed. and intr. Anthony Bonner, Stuttgart-Bad Cannstatt, Frommann-Holzboog.
Massa, Niccolò. 1549. Loica … distinta in sette libri ne li quali con mirabil facilità et brevità si può ogni modo di argomentare così probabile come dimostrativo apprendere. Venice, Francesco Bindoni & Maffeo Pasini.
Melanchthon, Philip. 1520. Compendiaria dialectices ratio. Leipzig, Valentin Schumann.
Ockham, William, and John Longeway. 2006. Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham: A translation of summa Logicae III-II: De Syllogismo Demonstrativo, and selections from the prologue to the Ordinatio. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame.
Ockham, William, Philotheus Boehner, Gedeon Gál, and Stephen J. Brown. 1974. Summa logicae. St. Bonaventure: Institutionum Franciscanum, Universitatis S. Bonaventurae.
Petrus Hispanus. 1972. Tractactus. Called afterwards Summule Logicales, Ed. L.M. De Rijk, Van Gorcum, Assen.
Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1547. Alexandri Piccolominei in mechanicas quaestiones Aristotelis paraphrasis… Elusdem commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum. Roma: Antonio Blado.
Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1551. L’instrumento della filosofia di M. Alessandro Piccolomini. Rome: Presso Vincenzo Valgrisi.
Piccolomini, Alessandro. 1576. Instrumento della filosofia naturale. Venice, D. Zaneti.
Pomponazzi, P. 1525. Tractatus acutissimi, utillimi et mere peripatetici. Venice, Octaviano Scoto.
Pomponazzi, P. 1999. Trattato sull’immortalità dell’anima. Florence, L.S. Olschki.
Ramus, Peter. 1964. Dialecticae institutiones. Aristotelicae animadversiones, Paris 1543. Reprinted Stuttgart-Bad Canstatt, introd. W. Risse.
Śmiglecki, Marcin (Cristophorus Clavius). 1618. Logica Martini Smiglecii Societatis Jesv, S. Theologiae Doctoris Selectis Dispvtationibus [et] quaestionibus illustrata, Et in duos Tomos distributa, In qua QvicQvid In Aristotelico Organo Vel Cognitv Necessarium, vel obscuritate perplexum … pertractatur; Cum indice Rerum copioso. Ingolstadii: Angermaria.
Speroni, Sperone. 1740. Opere. Venice, D. Occhi.
Speroni, Sperone. 1999. Dialogo delle lingue. Pescara, Libreria dell’Università Ed.
Tomitano, Bernardino. 1562. Animadversiones aliquot in primum librum Posteriorum Resolutoriorum, Contradictionum Solutiones in Aristotelis et Averrois dicta in primum librum Posteriorum Resolutoriorum, In novem Averrois Quaesita demonstrativa Argumenta, Averrois graviores sententiae in primum ac secundum librum Posteriorum Resolutoriorum per eundem observata. Venice, Luca-Antonio Giunta.
Tridapale Dal Borgo, A. 1547. La loica in lingua volgare tanto facile et breve, che ciascuno puo agevolmente et tosto apprendere il vere uso di quelle, et indirizzarsi a tutte le scienze. Con un trattato appresso utiliss. del uso di luoghi de gli argomenti. Venice, Paulo Gherardo.
Valla, Lorenzo. 1982. Repastinatio dialectice et philosophie, ed. G. Zippel, 2 vols. Padua, Antenore.
Valla, Lorenzo, Brian P. Copenhaver, and Lodi Nauta. 2012. Dialectical disputations. The I Tatti renaissance library series. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Varchi, Benedetto. 1859. Opere di Benedetto Varchi. Trieste, Sez. Letterario-Artistica del Lloyd Austriaco.
Veneto, Paolo, and Norman Kretzmann. 1979. Pauli Veneti Logica magna. Oxford: Published for the British Academy by the Oxford University Press.
Vives, Juan L. 1520. Adversus pseudodialectos. Sélestat, Lazarus Schürer.
Zabarella, Jacopo. 1597. Opera logica. Cologne L. Zetzner. (repr. Hildesheim–New York, Minerva, 1966).
Secondary Literature
Ariew, R. 1999. Descartes and the late scholastics on the order of the sciences. In Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, 350–364. Routledge.
Ariew, R. 2011. Descartes among the scholastics. Brill.
BabeS, O. 2014. The persuasive value of demonstration: Descartes’ discourse. Societate si politica 8 (2): 61–80.
Batllori, Miquel. 2004. Il Lullismo in Italia. Tentativo di sintesi, ed. and intr. by Francesco Santi and Michela Pereira; trad. Francisco José Díaz Marcilla, Pontificio Ateneo. Roma: Antonianum.
Bianchi, L. 2003. Studi sull’Aristotelismo del Rinascimento. Padua: Il Poligrafo.
Blackwell, Constance, and Sachiko Kusukawa. 1999. Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Conversations with Aristotle. Aldershot/Hants: Ashgate.
Bonner, Anthony. 2001. Recent Scholarship on Ramon Llull. Romance Philology. 54 (2): 377–392.
Buonocore, E. 2013. The Ur-text of late medieval and renaissance Lullian logic. Textual interrelations between the “Nove introductiones” and two traditional Pseudo-Lullian handbooks of logic: The “Logica parva” and the “Logica brevis et nova”. Studia lulliana 53 (108): 23–66.
Capozzi, M., and G. Roncaglia. 2009. Logic and philosophy of logic from humanism to Kant. In The development of modern logic, ed. Leila Haaparanta, 78–158. Oxford University Press.
Copenhaver, Brian P., and Charles B. Schmitt. 2002. Renaissance philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Corbini A. 2006. La teoria della scienza nel XIII secolo. I commenti agli Analitici secondi, Sismel–Edizioni del Galluzzo, Firenze.
Cozzoli, D. 2007. Alessandro Piccolomini and the certitude of mathematics. History and Philosophy of Logic 28 (2): 151–171.
Dod, Bernard G. 1990. Aristoteles latinus. In Cambridge history of later medieval philosophy, 45–79. Cambridge University Press.
Dumont, S. 2005. Duns Scotus’s Parisian Question on the Formal Distinction. Vivarium 43,1:7–62.
Finocchiaro, M.A. 2012. Galileo and the art of reasoning: Rhetorical foundation of logic and scientific method. Vol. 61. Springer Science & Business Media.
Garin, E. 1969. L’età nuova, Naples, Morano.
Gatto, R. 2006. Christoph Clavius’ “ordo servandus in addiscendis disciplinis mathematicis” and the teaching of mathematics in Jesuit colleges at the beginning of the modern era. Science & Education 15 (2–4): 235–258.
Gaukroger, Stephen. 1989. Cartesian logic: An essay on Descartes’s conception of inference. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Giacobbe, G.C. 1972. Il Commentarium de certitudine mathematicarum disciplinarum di Alessandro Piccolomini. Physis, 14: 162–93.
Goulding, R. 2006. Method and mathematics: Peter Ramus’s histories of the sciences. Journal of the History of Ideas 67 (1): 63–85.
Howell, Wilbur Samuel, and Petrus Ramus. 1961. Logic and rhetoric in England, 1500–1700. New York: Russell & Russell.
Jardine, N. 1976. Galileo’s road to truth and the demonstrative regress. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 7 (4): 277–318.
Jardine, Lisa. 1992. Humanistic logic. In Cambridge history of renaissance philosophy, 173–198. Cambridge University Press.
Jardine, N. 1997. Keeping order in the School of Padua: Jacopo Zabarella and Francesco Piccolomini on the offices of philosophy. In Method and order in renaissance philosophy of nature. The Aristotle commentary tradition, ed. D. DiLiscia, E. Kessler, and C. Methuen, 183–209. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Laird, W. 1987. Robert Grosseteste on the Subalternate Sciences. Traditio, 43: 147–169. http://www.jstor.org/stable/27831201.
Longeway, J.L. 2007. Demonstration and scientific knowledge in William of Ockham. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.
Mack, Peter. 2011. A history of renaissance rhetoric 1380–1620. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Mancosu, Paolo. 1992. Aristotelian logic and euclidean mathematics: Seventeenth-century developments of the quaestio de certitudine mathematicarum. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A. 23 (2): 241–265.
Mann, W.E. 1992. Duns Scotus, demonstration, and doctrine. Faith and philosophy 9 (4): 436–462.
Mikkeli, Heikki. 1993. An Aristotelian response to renaissance humanism: Jacopo Zabarella on the nature of arts and sciences. Helsinki: Suomen Historiallinen Seura.
Mikkeli, Heikki. 1999. The cultural programmes of Alessandro Piccolomini and Sperone Speroni at the Paduan Accademia degli Infiammati in the 1540s. In Philosophy in the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries: Conversations with Aristotle, ed. C. Blackwell and S. Kusukawa, 76–85. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Monfasani, John. 1976. George of Trebizond: A biography and a study of his rhetoric and logic. Leiden: Brill.
Monfasani, J. 1990. Lorenzo Valla and Rudolph Agricola. Journal of the History of Philosophy 28 (2): 181–200.
Moss, J.D., and W.A. Wallace. 2003. Rhetoric & dialectic in the time of Galileo. CUA Press.
Nauta, L. 2007. Lorenzo Valla and the rise of humanist dialectic. Cambridge University Press.
Ong, Walter J. 2004. Ramus: Method and the decay of dialogue: From the art of discourse to the art of reason. Chicago: University Of Chicago Press.
Palmieri, P. 2007. Science and authority in Giacomo Zabarella. History of Science 45 (4): 404–427.
Pérez-Ramos, A. 1988. Francis Bacon’s idea of science and the maker’s knowledge tradition. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Pinborg. 1984. Logica e semantica nel Medioevo. Torino: Boringhieri.
Platzeck E. W. 1972. Gottfried Willhelm Leibniz y Raimundo Llull. Estudios Lulianos 16: 129–193.
Platzeck, E.W., and Bernardus de Lavinheta. 1977. Explanatio compendiosaque applicatio Artis Raymundi Lulli. Hildesheim: Gerstenberg.
Pomata, Gianna, and Nancy G. Siraisi. 2005. Historia: Empiricism and erudition in early modern Europe. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Randall, John Herman. 1961. The school of Padua and the emergence of modern science. Padova: Editrice Antenore.
Ruiz Simon Josep, M. 1999. L’art de Ramon Llull i la teoria escolàstica de la cìencia. Barcellona: Assaig, Quaderns Crema.
Santi, Francesco. 1986. Osservazioni sul manoscritto 1001 della Biblioteca Riccardiana di Firenze, per la storia del Lullismo nelle regioni meridionali dell’Impero nel secolo XIV. ATCA 5: 231–267.
Serjeantson, R. 2014. Francis Bacon and the “interpretation of nature” in the late renaissance. Isis 105 (4): 681–705.
Sgarbi, Marco. 2014. The Italian mind: Vernacular logic in renaissance Italy (1540–1551). Leiden: Brill.
Spade, P.V. 2003. Late medieval logic. In Routledge history of philosophy, 402. Routledge.
Stump, E. 1989. Dialectic and its place in the development of medieval logic. Cornell University Press.
Stump, E. 1991. Aquinas on the Foundations of Knowledge. Canadian Journal of Philosophy; Supplementary Volume 17: 125.
Thomsen Thornqvist, Christina, and Börje Bydén. 2017. The Aristotelian tradition: Aristotle’s works on logic and metaphysics and their reception in the Middle Ages. Toronto: Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies.
Urbach, Peter. 1993. Francis Bacon’s philosophy of science: An account and a reappraisal. La Salle: Open Court.
Van Dyke, C. 2009. An Aristotelian Theory of Divine Illumination: Robert Grosseteste’s Commentary on the Posterior Analytics. British journal for the history of philosophy, 17 (4): 685–704.
Vasoli, C. 2011. Jacopo Zabarella e la “natura” della logica. Rivista di storia della filosofia.
Vickers, B. 1992. Francis Bacon and the Progress of knowledge. Journal of the History of Ideas 53 (3): 495–518. https://doi.org/10.2307/2709891.
Wainwright, M. 2018. Peter Ramus and the basis of logic. In The rational Shakespeare. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95258-1_1.
Wallace, W. 1992. Galileo’s logic of discovery and proof: The background, content, and use of his appropriated treatises on Aristotle’s posterior analytics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Wallace, W. 1995. Circularity and the Paduan regressus: From Pietro d’Abano to Galileo Galilei. Vivarium 33 (1): 76–97.
Walton, Craig. 1971. Ramus and Bacon on method. Journal of the History of Philosophy 9 (3): 289.
Yrjonsuuri, M., and M. Yrjönsuuri, eds. 2001. Medieval formal logic: Obligations, insolubles and consequences. Vol. 49. Springer Science & Business Media.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Section Editor information
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this entry
Cite this entry
Buonocore, E. (2021). Logic, Renaissance. In: Sgarbi, M. (eds) Encyclopedia of Renaissance Philosophy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1059-1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02848-4_1059-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02848-4
eBook Packages: Springer Reference Religion and PhilosophyReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Humanities