Skip to main content

Interactional Approaches to the Study of Classroom Discourse and Student Learning

  • Living reference work entry
  • First Online:
Research Methods in Language and Education

Part of the book series: Encyclopedia of Language and Education ((ELE))

  • 411 Accesses

Abstract

Although a great deal of research has investigated classroom discourse, just a small subset of this research has studied interaction together with learning. This chapter outlines studies of classroom discourse research that have foregrounded interaction and learning. The survey includes research from theoretical perspectives including Vygotskian sociocultural theory, ethnomethodological conversation analysis, and microethnography. The chapter concludes by outlining issues for the future including interactionally oriented definitions of learning, the use of more technologically sophisticated research tools, and more seamless connections between research and practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barnes, D. (1976). From communication to curriculum. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellack, A. A., Kliebard, H. M., Hyman, R. T., & Smith, F. L. (1966). The language of the classroom. New York: Teachers College Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cazden, C. B. (1988). Classroom discourse: The language of teaching and learning. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cekaite, A. (2007). A child’s development of interactional competence in a Swedish L2 classroom. Modern Language Journal, 91(1), 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dalton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. P. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33–56). Norwood: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gosen, M. N., Berenst, J., & de Glopper, K. (2015). Shared reading at kindergarten: Understanding book content through participation. Pragmatics and Society, 6(3), 367–397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, J. K., & Verplaeste, L. S. (Eds.). (2000). Second and foreign language learning through classroom interaction. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: The social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Edward Arnold.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jakonen, T. (2014). Knowing matters: How students address lack of knowledge in bilingual classroom interaction. Finland: University of Jyväskylä.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasper, G., & Wagner, J. (2011). A conversation-analytic approach to second language acquisition. In D. Atkinson (Ed.), Alternative approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 117–142). New York: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschmann, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Theories of learning and studies of instructional practice. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth, D. (1994). Classroom encounters with the unspeakable: “Do you see, Danelle?”. Discourse Processes, 17(2), 311–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macbeth, D. (2011). Understanding as an instructional matter. Journal of Pragmatics, 43(2), 438–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehan, H. (1979). Learning lessons: Social organization in the classroom. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2009a). In tow of the blue whale: Learning as interactional changes in topical orientation. Journal of Pragmatics, 41(8), 1519–1537.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melander, H., & Sahlström, F. (2009b). Learning to fly: The progressive development of situation awareness. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 53(2), 151–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mori, J., & Hasegawa, A. (2009). Doing being a foreign language learner in a classroom: Embodiment of cognitive states as social events. IRAL – International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 47(1), 65–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nikula, T. (2007). The IRF pattern and space for interaction: Comparing CLIL and EFL classrooms. In C. Dalton-Puffer, T. Nikula, & U. Smit (Eds.), Empirical perspectives on CLIL classroom discourse (pp. 179–204). Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. (2000). A longitudinal study of the development of expression of alignment in Japanese as a foreign language. In K. R. Rose & G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 103–120). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta, A. S. (2001). Second language acquisition processes in the classroom: Learning Japanese. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pekarek Doehler, S. (2010). Conceptual changes and methodological challenges: On language and learning from a conversation analytic perspective on SLA. In P. Seedhouse, S. Walsh, & C. Jenks (Eds.), Conceptualising learning in applied linguistics (pp. 105–127). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pekarek Doehler, S., & Ziegler, G. (2007). Doing language, doing science and the sequential organization of the immersion classroom. In H. Zhu, P. Seedhouse, W. Li, & V. Cook (Eds.), Language learning and teaching as social inter-action (pp. 72–86). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Reder, S., Harris, K., & Setzler, K. (2003). A multimedia adult learner corpus. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 546–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryle, G. (1945). Knowing how and knowing that. London: Meeting of the Aristotelian Society at the University of London Club.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seedhouse, P., Preston, A., Olivier, P., Jackson, D., Heslop, P., Balaam, M., Rafiev, A., & Kipling, M. (2014). The European digital kitchen project. Bellaterra Journal of Teaching & Learning Language & Literature, 7(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, J. M., & Coulthard, R. M. (1975). Towards an analysis of discourse: The English used by teachers and pupils. London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thorne, S. L., Hellermann, J., Jones, A., & Lester, D. (2015). Interactional practices and artifact orientation in mobile augmented reality game play. Psychnology, 13(2–3), 259–286.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh, S. (2011). Exploring classroom discourse: Language in action. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (1986). The meaning makers: Children learning language and using language to learn. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wells, G. (2009). The meaning makers: Learning to talk and talking to learn (2nd ed.). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to John Hellermann or Teppo Jakonen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Hellermann, J., Jakonen, T. (2015). Interactional Approaches to the Study of Classroom Discourse and Student Learning. In: King, K., Lai, YJ., May, S. (eds) Research Methods in Language and Education. Encyclopedia of Language and Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_35-1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-02329-8_35-1

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-02329-8

  • eBook Packages: Springer Reference EducationReference Module Humanities and Social SciencesReference Module Education

Publish with us

Policies and ethics