Sociolinguistic Insights into Digital Communication
This article provides an overview of research in two interrelated areas of language learning and teaching: digital communication (sometimes referred to as computer-mediated communication or CMC) and sociolinguistics. The research selected for inclusion in this article is primarily centered around the development of the sociolinguistic competence of learners of French because this simply happens to be the focus of major contributions in this field. Nonetheless, many of the studies reviewed here represent the use of a range of different types of digital communication for many different types of tasks and educational configurations.
The early developments and major contributions in this area of inquiry all deal with the analysis of sociolinguistic dimensions of language. This means that the research reviewed in this article is not preoccupied with aspects of communication that are right or wrong. Instead, these are features of language and discourse that are variable and, therefore, can only be considered appropriate or inappropriate according to any number of contextual factors (e.g., age, location, political affiliation, region, social standing, etc.).
KeywordsComputer-mediated communication Language learning Sociolinguistics
- American Council on the Teaching of Foreign Languages (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages (4th ed.). Alexandria: The National Standards Collaborative Board.Google Scholar
- Di Vito, N. O. (1992). “Present” concerns about French language teaching. Modern Language Journal, 76, 50–57.Google Scholar
- Graddol, D. (1994). Three models of language description. In D. Graddol & O. Boyd-Barrett (Eds.), Media texts: Authors and readers (pp. 1–21). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
- Hanna, B. E., & de Nooy, J. (2003). A funny thing happened on the way to the forum: Electronic discussion and foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7, 71–85.Google Scholar
- Hymes, D. (1972). On communicative competence. In J. B. Pride & J. Holmes (Eds.), Sociolinguistics (pp. 289–293). Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
- Kramsch, C., A’Ness, F., & Lam, W. S. E. (2000). Authenticity and authorship in the computer-mediated acquisition of L2 literacy. Language Learning & Technology, 4, 78–104.Google Scholar
- Negueruela, E. (2003). A sociocultural approach to teaching and researching second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and second language development (Doctoral dissertation). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
- van Compernolle, R. A., Williams, L., & McCourt, C. (2011). A corpus-driven study of second-person pronoun variation in L2 French synchronous computer-mediated communication. Intercultural Pragmatics, 8, 67–91.Google Scholar
- Williams, L. (2003). The nature and complexities of chat discourse: A qualitative case study of multi-level learners of French in an electronic environment (Doctoral dissertation). University Park: The Pennsylvania State University.Google Scholar
- Williams, L., Abraham, L. B., & Bostelmann, E. D. (2014). A survey-driven study of the use of digital tools for language learning and teaching. In J. P. Guikema & L. Williams (Eds.), Digital literacies in foreign and second language education (pp. 29–67). San Marcos: Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium (CALICO).Google Scholar