Social Networking Sites and Language Education

Living reference work entry

Latest version View entry history

Part of the Encyclopedia of Language and Education book series (ELE)


The use of social networking sites for second and foreign (L2) language learning and teaching has recently gained attention by practitioners and researchers of applied linguistics and L2 education. Informed by socially oriented theories of language learning and computer-assisted language learning (CALL) studies, researchers have examined L2 learning and its use in non-educational or vernacular sites like Facebook, L2 pedagogy using vernacular sites, and the use of commercial social networks designed specifically for language learning, like livemocha. Findings implicate the role of self-organized, autonomous learning processes, the development of socio-collaborative learning communities, and the challenges of balancing the learning benefits emergent from the user-driven agency of everyday use with the demands to meet formal curriculum-driven objectives. After a brief discussion of influences and definitions, this chapter examines, analyzes, and synthesizes selected research that illustrates these findings, concluding with problems and future directions.


Computer-assisted language learning Facebook Social networking sites Second language learning Web 2.0 


  1. Androutsopoulos, J. (2014). Languaging when contexts collapse: Aaudience design in social networking. Discourse, Context and Media, 4-5, 62–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antenos-Conforti, E. (2009). Microblogging on Twitter: Social networking in intermediate Italian classes. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 59–90). San Marcos: CALICO.Google Scholar
  3. Atkinson, D. (2011). Alternative approaches to second language acquisition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2011). Virtual social network communities: An investigation of language learners’ development of sociopragmatic awareness and multiliteracy skills. CALICO Journal, 29(1), 24–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blattner, G., & Fiori, M. (2009). Facebook in the language classroom: Promises and possibilities. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 6(1), 17–29.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, d., & Ellison, N. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230.Google Scholar
  7. Chen, H. (2013). Identity practices of multilingual writers in social networking spaces. Language Learning and Technology, 17(2), 143–170.Google Scholar
  8. Clark, C., & Gruba, P. (2010). The use of social networking sites for foreign language learning: An autoethnographic study of Livemocha. In Proceedings of ASCILITE - Australian Society for Computers in Learning in Tertiary Education Annual Conference 2010 (pp. 164–173). Melbourne: ASCILITE.Google Scholar
  9. Demaizière, F., & Zourou, K. (Eds.). (2012). Social media and language learning: (R)evolution? ALSIC: Language Learning and Information and Communication Systems, 15(1), 2–15.Google Scholar
  10. Garrison, D.R., Anderson, T., & Archer, W. (2000). Critical inquiry in a text-based environment: Computer conferencing in higher education. The Internet and Higher Education, 2, 87–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gonzales, A. (2013). Rapport management and online learning: L2 socialization in Livemocha. In C. Meskill (Ed.), Online teaching and learning: Sociocultural perspectives (pp. 199–218). London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Harrison, R., & Thomas, M. (2009). Identity in online communities: Social networking sites and language learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society, 7(2), 109–124.Google Scholar
  13. Klimanova, L., & Dembovskaya, S. (2013). L2 identity, discourse, and social networking in Russian. Language Learning and Technology, 17(1), 69–88.Google Scholar
  14. Lam, W. (2000). Second language literacy and the design of the self: A case study of a teenager writing on the Internet. TESOL Quarterly, 34, 457–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lamy, M.-N., & Zourou, K. (2013). Social networking for language education. New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Liaw, M.-L., & English, K. (2013). Online and offsite: Student driven development of the Taiwan-France telecollaborative project: Beyond these walls. In M. Lamy & K. Zourou (Eds.), Social networking for language education (pp. 158–176). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (Eds.). (2009). The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning, CALICO Monograph Series (Vol. 9). San Marcos: CALICO.Google Scholar
  18. Lomicka, L., & Lord, G. (2012). A tale of tweets: Analyzing microblogging among language learners. System, 40, 48–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lundby, K. (2009). Mediatization: Concept, changes, consequence. New York: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  20. McBride, K. (2009). Social networking sites in foreign language classes: Opportunities for re-creation. In L. Lomicka & G. Lord (Eds.), The next generation: Social networking and online collaboration in foreign language learning (pp. 35–58). San Marcos: CALICO.Google Scholar
  21. Mills, N. (2011). Situated learning through social networking communities: The development of joint enterprise, mutual engagement, and a shared repertoire. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 345–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mitchell, K. (2012). A social tool: Why and how ESOL students use Facebook. CALICO Journal, 29(3), 471–493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Musser, J., O’Reilly, T., & O’Reilly Radar Team. (2007). Web 2.0 Principles and Best Practices. Sebastopol (California): O’Reilly.Google Scholar
  24. Pasfield-Neofitou, S. (2011). Second language learners’ experiences of virtual community and foreignness. Language Learning and Technology, 15(2), 92–108.Google Scholar
  25. Prensky, M. (2009). H. Sapiens Digital: From digital immigrants to digital natives to digital wisdom. Innovate: Journal of Online Education, 5(3). Retrieved from view=article&id=705.
  26. Reinhardt, J., & Ryu, J. (2013). Using social network-mediated bridging activities to develop socio-pragmatic awareness in elementary Korean. International Journal of Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Teaching, 3(3), 18–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Reinhardt, J., & Zander, V. (2011). Social networking in an intensive English program classroom: A language socialization perspective. CALICO Journal, 28(2), 326–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Selwyn, N. (Ed.). (2008). Education 2.0? Designing the web for teaching and learning. London: Teaching and Learning Research Program.Google Scholar
  29. Solis, B. (2015). The Conversation Prism. Downloaded 15 March 2016 from: Scholar
  30. Stevenson, M., & Liu, M. (2010). Learning a language with web 2.0: Exploring the use of social networking features of foreign language learning websites. CALICO Journal, 27(2), 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thorne, S. (2003). Artifacts and cultures-of-use in intercultural communication. Language Learning and Technology, 7(2), 38–67.Google Scholar
  32. Thorne, S., & Reinhardt, J. (2008). ‘Bridging activities,’ new media literacies and advanced foreign language proficiency. CALICO Journal, 25(3), 558–572.Google Scholar
  33. Warschauer, M., & Kern, R. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Wilson, R., Gosling, S., & Graham, L. (2012). A review of Facebook research in the social sciences. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 7(3), 203–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Zourou, K. (2012). On the attractiveness of social media for language learning: A look at the state of the art. ALSIC: Language Learning and Information and Communication Systems, 15(1). Accessed 8 August 2015.
  36. Zourou, K., & Loiseau, M. (2013). Bridging design and language interaction and reuse in Livemocha's culture section. In M. Lamy & K. Zourou (Eds.), Social networking for language education (pp. 77–99). New York: Palgrave-Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of ArizonaTucsonUSA

Personalised recommendations